• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is the most telling objection to Mill's Greatest Happiness Principle?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What is the most telling objection to Mill's Greatest Happiness Principle? Jeremy Bentham founded utilitarianism in the nineteenth century as an ethical principle. In its original form utilitarianism had numerous deficiencies and was heavily criticised by philosophers and advocates alike. John Stuart Mill later refined and modified utilitarianism as to make it more accessible to society. John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) a philosopher and Economist was one of the most influential liberal thinkers of the nineteenth century. The son of James Mill, John was given an intensive private education, in which he began Greek at the age of three, and Latin at the age of eight. John Stuart Mill was an advocate of utilitarianism, "The Greatest Happiness Principle". The doctrine was key in the naissance of many humanitarian landmarks in the nineteenth century. The reform acts of 1832 and 1867 were spearheaded by ideals of utility. Utilitarianism was the spine upon which democracy was built. This very simple doctrine has been at the centre of much criticism. This essay aims to explore whether such criticism is founded and if so why? The following essay will encompass the major objections leveled at utilitarianism. ...read more.

Middle

To spend an evening out with friends, therefore, would be morally wrong. One could be doing aid or charity work instead and thus be increasing the general 'happiness' of the general population. According to utilitarianism, therefore, socialising is wrong. So would other innocent self-indulgent actions such as "sleeping in" on a Sunday. By the same token when should one stop giving money away to charity? Well one should only theoretically stop when you cannot increase the general happiness of the population. Utilitarianism is clearly and impracticable ideal that could never work in contemporary society. Utilitarianism does not validate motives. The "rightness" of an action depends on its ability to produce happiness with no reference to its motive. Can a moral code stay ambivalent over such critical matters? Clearly ones motive is as, if not more important than its consequences. Despite these valid points utilitarianism is only concerned with consequences of actions. But how is it possible to calculate all the possible consequences of an action? How can we ever be sure that any action will produce the greatest net happiness? We might be able to assume, with some certainty, that action (A) ...read more.

Conclusion

Such actions are intrinsically wrong. Deciding what is right and wrong requires more than a mere analysis of effects. One must move away from teleological theories and towards those that consider the extent to which the morality of an act depends on the nature of the act itself. Many objections have been levelled at utilitarianism. Each valid and unrelenting in its criticism. Utilitarianism at a glance advocates injustice, lying and stealing as long as they promote "the general happiness of the population". One must not forget, however, that utilitarianism was instrumental in creating ideals and standards in relation to humanity in the nineteenth century. If utilitarianism was so unpractical would have been so influential in so many key landmarks throughout history? In contemporary society, however, it is just an ideal and not a workable solution. For this reason the theory is deemed with considerable antagonism. How can one follow a doctrine that is almost impossible to accurately interpret? One, therefore, could never be truly a utilitarian or live by its manifesto. How can a doctrine state innocent self-indulgent actions such as socialising with ones friends as morally wrong? How can one ever accurately predict another's reaction? In conclusion the inaccessibility of utilitarianism is its major flaw. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an unfair system of ethics which could not work in the ...

    This form of utilitarianism is more closely associated with John Stuart Mill. I must obey the rule even if it doesn't lead to the greatest pleasure or happiness for me. A rule utilitarian will maintain that I must always drive on the left hand-side of the road in the UK,

  2. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    The difference lies in the differentiation between the value of the action and the level of blame/credit given to the person committing that action. Mill's Utilitarianism would advocate almost exactly the same course of action as Conventional Morality in most situations.

  1. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    Like Mill, Nietzsche wanted to replace old values with new ones. He wanted to move towards a new type of human being. - "The Uberman" In Nietzsche's writing, "Beyond Good and Evil" he speaks of the "new philosophers" - individuals of 'socio - intellectual status' who must pave the way forward for a new world.

  2. Compare, contrast and evaluate Plato and Mill on the relationship between individual and society

    of conduct in our dealing with others in return for the protection we receive from society. For example, we are bound to observe and respect the rights of others and according to him "As soon as any part of a person's conduct affects prejudicially the interests of others, society has jurisdiction over it".

  1. A Critical Analysis of Lao Tzu's Tao Teh Ching - Chineses philosophy.

    Heaven and Earth will be harmonised And send down sweet dew. When once the Primal Simplicity diversified, Different names appeared. Are there not enough names now?"12 "Tao never makes any ado, And yet it does everything. If a ruler can cling to it, All things will grow of themselves.

  2. Assess Utilitarianism

    were; in fact, Mill borrows a lot of ideas from Aristotle in particular). He stated that "It is better to be Socrates unsatisfied than a fool satisfied", indicating that you cannot ever be truly happy without intellect, and that your mind will always be more important that your body.

  1. Why are justice and integrity problematic for utilitarianism?

    Such lower-order desires may include family, friends, intellect and culture. He also outlines people's opinions and values as a form of project with views against injustice, cruelty or killing as his examples. We may consider, therefore, that in desiring our own happiness we desire the above things also, and through experiences we develop our own moral codes and values.

  2. UTILITARIANISM In this paper I will be discussing utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the theory ...

    Just because the sadistic voyeur thinks its right, it is not morally right. Bentham's principle states as long as you gaining pleasure then there should not be any pain involved. He is saying that it may be right to open the curtain today but wrong tomorrow.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work