• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What was the cause of Enron's collapse?

Extracts from this document...


Enron is another company that was affected by Arthur Andersen and its own lack of ethics. Enron has been in existence since 1985 providing products and services related to natural gas and electricity. It had numerous operations in the gas industry, such as, Transportation and Distribution, Interstate Transmission, of Natural Gas, Northern Natural Gas co., Transwestern Pipeline Company, and more. Since 1985 Enron made numerous acquisitions, purchases, and sales. It acquired Natural Gas, El Paso Energy Corporation, Portland General Corporation, and more companies, which helped Enron become the 7th largest corporation in the U.S. and therefore, published in Fortune 500 magazine. (Daily Enron.com, pp 1) In 2001, Enron was heavily involved in trading gas and electricity with its stock was worth over $80 and plunged to $0.10 a share in early 2002. ...read more.


These companies were viewed as separate from Enron, even though Enron and its directors effectively controlled the partnership, since 3% of the money invested in these partnerships came from outside of Enron. (Puscas, pp 2) This was convenient for Enron because any debt from these partnerships did not have to be reported in Enron's balance sheet given that they were treated separate from Enron. Arthur Andersen was Enron's bookkeeper and their lack of ethics permitted Enron to keep acting unlawfully. Arthur Andersen approved Enron's financial statements although they were aware of the Enron's scheme. Arthur Andersen did not disclose Enron's poor financial conditions, but rather covered them saying they were good. To prove their statement Arthur Andersen and Enron acted unethically and illegally by shredding thousands of documents that would prove Arthur Andersen's approval of Enron's financial statements. ...read more.


(Daily Enron.com pp 2) Enron's unethical behavior as well as Arthur Andersen's brought Enron to file Chapter 11 bankruptcy in December 2001 making it the biggest bankruptcy petition in U.S. history. Soon after that, fired many of its employees worldwide. In March 2002, Arthur Andersen was indicted by a federal grand jury for shredding Enron's documents and suspends any new business dealings for Enron and Arthur Andersen. Acting ethically was obviously Enron's and Arthur Andersen's problem since they did not recognized or acted on their ethical issues before they became legal problems. Enron's acts educated corporations that having an ethics book is not sufficient, but one must act on it. The consequences of Enron's lack of ethics, also advised corporations how they should ethically perceived to particular situations if they don't want to be involved in scandals or go bankrupt. "Arthur Andersen and Enron have damaged their company's reputation through a negative perception of corporate ethics. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Ethics in Business

    that support system to clear up any questions they have -- questions that managers are no longer around to answer. Well-communicated guidelines help set the standards for employees. An important part of an ethics program is just increasing awareness levels.

  2. Modern life-prolonging technologies have sharpened some ancient dilemmas on the value of life.

    assent (kill 1 to save 101), even though in both cases the general principle of sacrificing fewer for more is the same. Without supplementing their original principle, SL proponents cannot distinguish killing 1 to save 101 and killing 100 to save 101, although most would distinguish these cases intuitively.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work