• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Nietzsche decide on the title Beyond Good and Evil?

Extracts from this document...


Why did Nietzsche decide on the title 'Beyond Good and Evil?' Nietzsche's 'Beyond Good and Evil' has for many years been an enigma to all but the most dedicated readers and philosophers. It's small wonder, then, that the title is equally cryptic. The scope of the statement is extremely wide, and it is often taken out of context to imply nihilism. I believe that the title represents the meeting point of all Nietzsche's ideas. His ethics, epistemology, metaphysics and aesthetics share the one common ideal of stepping past traditional values and creating something altogether new and dangerous. The title clearly reflects this. To consider the title I believe we must also consider the subtitle: 'Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future.' The book is very much Nietzsche outlining the ideal world in which the Will to Power is recognized as the supreme force of mankind, and all forms of dogmatism and Christian values have been suppressed. ...read more.


This attitude has bred the 'herds' of Europe which Nietzsche so despises. No, values must be 're-valued' in order to advance man, and break free of the restrictive morals that have put Europe in the state which it is in. This rejection of traditional morals is sometimes misconstrued as nihilism - this is grossly incorrect. In fact, the opposite is true. Going beyond good and evil involves, for Nietzsche, making the most out of man's potential, i.e. exerting the Will to Power to full effect. Only thus can we advance. Throughout the book, the concept of going beyond good and evil is developed further and constantly referenced. It is clear that this forms the main spine of Nietzsche's ideas. We arrive at a conclusion: life itself is Beyond Good and Evil. This, I believe, is the basic message behind the book itself, and also the reason why Nietzsche chose this title specifically. ...read more.


This can be reality through effective use of the arts. So if the will to power, through the arts, has not managed to shape society, then what has? Nietzsche's answer here is simple: theism. Many of the common values we hold have their roots in sacred texts or the preachings of religious believers. Christianity, among other religions, have promoted weakness and piety - something which enforces good and evil has ultimate values and thereby restricts the will to power. This, Nietzsche claims, has led to Europe becoming weak and self-sacrificing - a continent of slaves. Ultimately, it is the religions and their values that we must overcome if we are to go beyond good and evil. Religion managed a re-evaluation of all values many years ago, establishing power and self-interest as evil; whilst pity and meekness were seen to be good. This is something which must be reversed and overcome. This will truly free man from the dogmatic concepts introduced hundreds of years ago and place him beyond good and evil. This was Nietzsche's ultimate goal and, hence, the title of his book. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    Emotions are an important part of human life, and a great leader would have to understand (and this would usually be best understood by feeling the emotions oneself) human life to be effective. Plato argues that this would come from knowledge of the Forms, the perfect example of something - there is one for every notion that exists on earth.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    you will not be condemned by society. - Mill furthermore claims that it would be a great misunderstanding to suppose that this doctrine is one of selfish indifference about the well being of others. - There is indeed a need for an increase in the exertion of promoting the good

  1. problem of evil

    A final difficulty lies with the concept of us all being seminally present in Adam's loins, this is biologically impossible so we cannot all be responsible for the Original Sin. From comparing the strengths with the criticisms we can see that Augustine's theodicy ultimately fails.

  2. Introduction to Philosophy.

    For the real truth one must go beyond the appearance and go to the ideas/ forms/ universal facts. THE ALLEGORY OF THE CAVE : Hhhhhhhhhh > By this image: 1. He criticized the Sophists who taught people be rhetoric which is based on shadows.

  1. A Small Excerpt From My Autobiography

    Bereft of the tender, loving, affectionate hands that so often comforted me and tucked me neatly onto my warm, cosy bed. This bedtime thought always evoked copious tears to drench my pillow late at night. How dare my mother do that!

  2. Philosophy - analysis of Nietzsche, Sartre and Tolstoy

    We created our values ourselves. Meaning because we have no more faith, God no longer exists. Our opinion: We do not think that Sartre is making a persuasive argument because we do not think that humans could exist on their own.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work