• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Nietzsche decide on the title Beyond Good and Evil?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why did Nietzsche decide on the title 'Beyond Good and Evil?' Nietzsche's 'Beyond Good and Evil' has for many years been an enigma to all but the most dedicated readers and philosophers. It's small wonder, then, that the title is equally cryptic. The scope of the statement is extremely wide, and it is often taken out of context to imply nihilism. I believe that the title represents the meeting point of all Nietzsche's ideas. His ethics, epistemology, metaphysics and aesthetics share the one common ideal of stepping past traditional values and creating something altogether new and dangerous. The title clearly reflects this. To consider the title I believe we must also consider the subtitle: 'Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future.' The book is very much Nietzsche outlining the ideal world in which the Will to Power is recognized as the supreme force of mankind, and all forms of dogmatism and Christian values have been suppressed. ...read more.

Middle

This attitude has bred the 'herds' of Europe which Nietzsche so despises. No, values must be 're-valued' in order to advance man, and break free of the restrictive morals that have put Europe in the state which it is in. This rejection of traditional morals is sometimes misconstrued as nihilism - this is grossly incorrect. In fact, the opposite is true. Going beyond good and evil involves, for Nietzsche, making the most out of man's potential, i.e. exerting the Will to Power to full effect. Only thus can we advance. Throughout the book, the concept of going beyond good and evil is developed further and constantly referenced. It is clear that this forms the main spine of Nietzsche's ideas. We arrive at a conclusion: life itself is Beyond Good and Evil. This, I believe, is the basic message behind the book itself, and also the reason why Nietzsche chose this title specifically. ...read more.

Conclusion

This can be reality through effective use of the arts. So if the will to power, through the arts, has not managed to shape society, then what has? Nietzsche's answer here is simple: theism. Many of the common values we hold have their roots in sacred texts or the preachings of religious believers. Christianity, among other religions, have promoted weakness and piety - something which enforces good and evil has ultimate values and thereby restricts the will to power. This, Nietzsche claims, has led to Europe becoming weak and self-sacrificing - a continent of slaves. Ultimately, it is the religions and their values that we must overcome if we are to go beyond good and evil. Religion managed a re-evaluation of all values many years ago, establishing power and self-interest as evil; whilst pity and meekness were seen to be good. This is something which must be reversed and overcome. This will truly free man from the dogmatic concepts introduced hundreds of years ago and place him beyond good and evil. This was Nietzsche's ultimate goal and, hence, the title of his book. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. problem of evil

    This justifies temporary evil, which if complying with Ireneaus' thought enables the understanding of good. Many philosophers have added to Ireneaus' theodicy including John Hick (who claims that good developed from free will is better than ready-made goodness), and Peter Vardy who used an analogy of a king to illustrate

  2. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    the belief that "free individuals" develop into more fully formed human beings. His arguments essentially reflect a strong belief in human reasoning and the ability for all of us to develop into mature autonomous individuals. Mill's approach is therefore libertarian in that he saw the confining controlling state as a

  1. Plato and Nietzsche on Authority

    In this case, their authority could be considered illegitimate. Plato, especially in Republic, gives epistemology and metaphysics substantial roles in political philosophy. In Plato's ideally just city, philosophers would gain power, or, at the very least, rulers would have to engage 'sincerely and adequately' in philosophy. Plato also suggests a rigorous training program for his philosopher-kings - they must have their emotions properly trained.

  2. Introduction to Philosophy.

    He discusses that with reason one can be able to find an answer. We here find the : Euthyphro Dilemma : Are the things good because the gods say so? Or are they truly good? > So from the THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE he concludes that: Sense of perception brings

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work