• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why does the mind and body problem still exist?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

An essay to discuss Why does the mind and body problem still exist? Word count 1839 inc quotes Barbara Mulcahy January 2006-01-06 This essay will explore the different theories involved in the mind and body problem. I will attempt to do this by firstly defining what the mind and body is secondly discussing what the mind and body problem is. Thirdly discussing the existing approaches to the problem and finally discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the approaches. The body is that which we perceive ourselves to be with our senses. It usually includes arms, legs a head and so on. The mind is that which is responsible for one's thoughts and feelings, the seat of the faculty of reason. What is the mind and body problem? We have a conception of at least 2 different kinds of things that exist in the world mental and physical here are a few examples: Mental Physical Pain Mount Everest Euphoria Hydrogen Desire Mass Purpose Size Belief Location Any of us could generate a long list of things and we know that both these types of things are mental phenomena or physical phenomena and are part of our world. So how are the mental and physical related if at all. The mind and body problem dates back at least to Plato (b427bce). By some accounts Plato was the first dualist with the first materialist Aristotle(b384bce) close at hand. ...read more.

Middle

Later materialists included Karl Mark And Friedrich Engels, turning the idealists dialects of George Heigl upside down, provided materialists with a view on processes of a quantitative and qualititative change called Dillectual materialism and with a materialist account of the course of history known as historical materialism. In recent years Paul and Patricia Churchland have advocated an extreme form of materialism known as eliminative which holds that mental phenomena simply do not exist at all, that talk of the mental reflects a totally spurious 'folk psychology' that simply has no basis in fact, something like the way that folk science speaks of demon-cursed illness. Eliminative materialism is an extreme reductionist theory, which appears to discount the possibility of a scientific psychology. Materialism has neuroscience on its side most neuro scientists believe in the identity of mind and brain a position that may be considered related to materialism and physicalism. Another theory is functionalism which is if an object is created under the style of functionalism that means that its artistic beauty cannot be separated from its function. Functionalism is the dominant theory of mental states in modern philosophy. Functionalism was developed as an answer to the mind-body problem because of objections to both the identity theory and logical behaviourism. According to functionalists the mental states that make up consciousness can essentially be redefined as complex interactions between different functional processes. Because these processes are not limited to a particular physical state or physical medium they can be realized in multiple ways, including theoretically within non biological systems. ...read more.

Conclusion

It also fails to offer a convincing analysis of our knowledge of our thinking and of the content of our thought. Strengths and weaknesses of Functionalism. One of the strengths is that Functionalism emphasizes the importance of analyzing societies as systems, and that systems do give rise to distinct phenomena. In particular our attention is directed towards the ways in which social institutions are integrated with each other. For example, social class and education. Another weakness is that it is by no means clear that the series of mental events, unlike the series of brain events, cause a continuous, self contained sequence. It also denies the private experience of qualia which is things cannot be communicated, or apprehended by any other means than direct experience. To conclude it has been the purpose of this essay to explain why the mind-body problem still exists. For the present, and in all probability for a very long time to come. It must remain a matter of philosophical opinion whether mind is for anything, and if so what precisely is it for, or whether mind is merely an aspect of matter which, by the grace of nature as it were, happens to be associated with the workings of our brain. Psychology as we have known it so far could teach us only about behaviour and experience of the unified psychological organism. It might be however, that the mind science of tomorrow when paranormal as well as normal phenomena has been taken into account will be able to return an unequivocal answer to the question. So the debate continues. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Assess Functionalism

    We can realise things in different ways, for example - the monetary value of �1 can be realised in different ways, such as; two 50p s, five 20p s, or a single coin. - This proves that our minds do not strictly have to be brains.

  2. Synoptic Study, Satre, Engels and Marx

    Facticity takes in to account that there are certain things I will never be able to do because they go against my physicality and the laws of physics. It includes all the aspects of my life that I have no choice in; my parents, my place in time, my nationality etc.

  1. Hume has shown miracles do not exist

    Hume's appeal to the laws of nature is inconsistent with his own writings. He suggests that our ideas of scientific laws may just be psychological habit based on what we repeatedly see. He famously observed that there was no good reason to expect the sun to rise in the morning, yet we do all expect this.

  2. How might we combat the Gettier Problem? In giving your answer set forth two ...

    A true and justified belief and these are necessary conditions, however are they sufficient? Gettier argues they are not. One such example of a Gettier - style counter example would be as follows, John locks the door to his home and goes to work.

  1. Religious Experience is a construct of the mind - Discuss

    church was a form of social control to keep people oppressed and exploited. For Marx then, culture was the cause of religious experience.

  2. How successful are Descartes' arguments for the real distinction of mind from body? Upon ...

    Clearly perceiving something might mean that you think you are sure of it but you could be wrong, Clarity and distinctness of perception means that you recognise the reasons for the claim made by clear perception for what you believe to be true being true, Descartes called this the mark of knowledge.

  1. There is no Reason to Assume I will exist after my Death.

    the soul, the experience of deju-vu being the soul remembering or recollecting a previous existence. He reasoned that the soul has no specific evil to destroy it and therefore must be immortal, arguing that the immortality of the soul and the occurrence of deju-vu proved the existence of an afterlife.

  2. Evaluate the claim that the soul is distinct from the body:

    It resulted to people speaking of the mind and body as different phenomena as if the soul was something identifiably extra within a person intrinsically wrong. He used the example of someone watching a cricket game and asking where the team spirit was.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work