• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

With reference to the topics you have investigated, examine and comment on the claim that the teachings of the new testament do not add anything of value to our value of our understanding of Life after Death. (50 marks)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Sam Benham With reference to the topics you have investigated, examine and comment on the claim that the teachings of the new testament do not add anything of value to our value of our understanding of Life after Death. (50 marks) The claim that the teachings of the New Testament do not add anything of value to our value of our understanding of life after death is a very big claim to make. With reference to the topics I have investigated, 1Cor 15, St. Paul, Soma, The Soul, Dualism, Monism and the Empty Tomb, I will examine and comment on that claim. This claim is controversial because it has many objections from other scholars and many Christians. In 1 Corinthians 15 there are six key sections. The first of which is Christ?s Resurrection. Here Paul is keen to tell the Corinthians that he isn?t the teacher on life after death and that he is simply passing on Jesus? message, because as we know, Jesus was the teacher and his apostles, which later included Paul after Damascus, were his messengers. The second section is the denial of the resurrection. Paul says that some people argue that ?there will be no resurrection of the dead? and some scholars argue that this is not a theological argument, but Paul argues that the soul is immortal and not the body. Paul illustrates the theological implications of the objections from Corinth are that if dead men don?t rise, then Christ did not rise and Christian faith is empty. Paul continues to say that if Christ was not raised, then our preaching is useless. Clearly Jesus? resurrection must have happened as the tradition has survived. The third section is all about the consequences of Christ?s resurrection. Barrett writes that ?the resurrection of Christ is a pledge and proof of the resurrection of his people?. St Paul makes a direct link between Adam and Christ, Adam?s actions had far reaching consequences such as original sin and Christ?s Resurrection has too such consequence such as universal salvation. ...read more.

Middle

Additionally, Paul uses the analogy of the seed, stressing the continuity of the earthly body with the resurrected ?glorious? body. In 1Cor 15:50-54 Sanders comments that immortality is ?put on? and replaces mortality. Paul was not thinking of an interior soul which escapes its mortal shell and floats free, nor the new life being breathed into the same body, but again of transformation, achieved by covering mortality with immortality, which it ? swallows?; emphasising the physical. Wright and Barrett argue similar points. My own personal opinion is that Paul believed more in a spiritual resurrection but he didn?t rule out a physical resurrection. In light of the statement I think that this is an influential part of our understanding of Life after death because it helps us understand which resurrection was more likely. The term ?soul? refers to ourselves, who earn rewards and consequences by coming to know, or failing to come to know, God by faith. We will come to earn blissful life in heaven, or eternal loss of heaven. Jesus? parables clearly teach us that it is the same self judgement which faces judgement after death as the self who lived on earth in the body. There are three different theories about the soul. The first theory being the Theory of Origen. The soul existed in the heavenly realms before descending into this world, and that its present imprisonment in a material body is the result of a primeval fall from grace. This was never widely accepted, and rejected by the Church at the Council of Constantinople in 540 AD. The second argument is that of Traducianism. The theory that the soul-substance which God breathed into Adam has been passed down through generation after generation of his descendants by continual division. To some extent, this draws parallel with modern genetic science: everything comes from a gene pool. This was gradually abandoned by the Church. ...read more.

Conclusion

Brown argues that there was an understandable hostility in the early church toward the Jewish leaders. In Christian eyes, they had engineered a judicial murder of Jesus. Therefore, because Joseph of Arimathea was a part of the Sanhedrin that condemned Jesus, it is highly unlikely that he was a Christian invention (there is no reason why Christians would make up a story about a Jewish Sanhedrinist who does what is right by Jesus!). The empty tomb is reported by many independent early sources (incl. Mt, Mk, Lk, Jn, and Paul). Jewish historian Josephus reports that Jewish women were not even allowed to serve as witnesses in court; making it even more remarkable that it was women who discovered the empty tomb (surely this detail would have been omitted or changed if it were not true?!). My own personal opinion is that there was a resurrection, but going on the arguments given to us, I think that it was a bodily resurrection and that I would fall under the bracket of a monist. I believe that the New Testament teachings help us in our understanding of Life after Death because it teaches us about the body and soul, but I believe that it was a bodily resurrection because i believe the that the body and soul must have been working together as one to raise Jesus from the dead, because if it was one or the other then Jesus would have come back as a different person. Others would disagree with me because they feel that the bible is made up and that the historicity aspect is just coincidence and that it was a recent write-up of events of landmarks still existing today. This view fails because Johanine eschatology proves otherwise. The pool with five porticos still exists today, and that wouldn?t have been included in John?s gospel if it didn?t exist in John?s time. The eschatological aspect of it is that Jesus? second coming will be at the Parousia when, we rise, bodily and spiritually to overcome death and evil. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Christianity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Christianity essays

  1. With Reference to other aspects of Human Experience explore the claim that there will ...

    What Jesus meant here was that by using Roman coins the Romans were to be recognised as the state authority. In addition, however, there was the question of further allegiance owed to God. The conflict between Religion and state cannot simply be thought of something of the past.

  2. Christian Philosophy on Death

    In the second stage, anger, the griever says, "Why me? It's not fair?!" (either referring to God, oneself, or anybody perceived, rightly or wrongly, as "responsible") The third stage is bargaining. In this stage, the dying person says, "I know its me but..."

  1. Outline and explain the issues included in uncovering the historical Patrick (30 Marks)

    Baring this in mind, Bannavem Taburniae would have to be south of Hadrian's Wall. And the last of the three criteria, is that Patrick must have been living near a town with a civil administration centre. This is because Patrick's father Calpurnius was a collector of taxes.

  2. Examine the main ideas and strengths of the design argument for the existence of ...

    The idea that the universe is designed is subjective, meaning that there are many different ideas about it. Different observations in the natural world can produce different theories to account for their existence. Also, this proof is built upon an analogy.

  1. Life after death and problem of evil

    He emphasises the need for proof, yet what proof is there that evil exists. In many cases it can be beneficial to society, and what we think of as evil is in fact not, we just perceive it as such.

  2. 'The Jesus' parables of the Kingdom of God were about a future hope of ...

    Whereas, the 'Parable of the Darnel' states that future hope of salvation will only occur for the people who have recognized the Kingdom of God presently. This is a common Matthian theme that at the end of time the

  1. Outline and examine Jesus attitudes concerning wealth and the poor. To what extent do ...

    amount of money on food, so instead of wasting it he gives it to those who would need it more. Also another example would be of the tax collector Zacchaeus, in which after the crowd moaned about him, he declared that he would give away some of his possessions.

  2. Evaluate the claim that Mark's Gospel is all about the failure of the disciples.

    For Mark readers, as well as for those who heard Jesus in the synagogue, Jesus is one with an authority far greater that of the scribes let alone the disciples. Jesus hits back at their failure claiming "you faithless generation."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work