• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Xenotransplantation - An Ethical Alternative to Donor Organ Transplantation?

Extracts from this document...


Xenotransplantation - An Ethical Alternative to Donor Organ Transplantation? Introduction Xenotransplantation is a term used to refer to the transplantation of organs between different species. Transplantation within human species (allotransplantation) has established an acceptable clinical role, especially involving organs such as the kidney, heart, bone marrow and liver. In fact, its success has caused demand to far outstrip supply. This is primarily due to shortage of available human donor organs. Many initiatives have been introduced such as publicity campaigns, distribution of donor cards, appointment of transplant co-ordinators, implementation of protocols in hospitals, and action programs for public and professionals. However, these have not been sufficient to increase the donor supply significantly. In 1993 in the United States alone, there were about 32,000 patients waiting for different organs . Most of these would either die or be severely incapacitated in the absence of a transplant. As the programs become more successful, more recipients are identified, but the prospective increase in donors has lagged behind. The median waiting period for a number of various types of donor organs has also increased significantly over the last few years and continues to be a problem. ...read more.


Alternately, - dropping the issue of inherent animal rights - if animals are subjects for our ethical concern ,how does this valuation of their worth as living creatures measure up against the ways in which we can exploit them purely for our own ends? Certainly the argument used for employing xenotransplantation proposes that the loss of human life is ethically more significant than loss of animal life. To the supporters of xenotransplantation this seems a convincing answer. The duty to preserve human life justifies a xenograft. 3. "Speciesism" The opponents feel that there is no justification for ascribing to humans an absolute right to life to the exclusion of the rights to life of other creatures. Xenotransplantation is not morally acceptable because it elevates humans to an unjustifiably high status in the natural order, regardless of the human good which might come of it - such as preserving human life. To do so is termed 'speciesism'. 4. Endangerment of Survival of Higher Primates If xenotransplantation became successful it would open up opportunities for extended life to many patients. However, large numbers of animal sacrifices would have to be made. ...read more.


But the prospects soon worsened again as the risks of animal to human transplants became more apparent. All mammal species studied have a chromosomal region located identically. The goal here was to develop strains of pigs whose organs would not induce a strong rejection in humans because the human immune system would `see' human tissue groups on the pig organ. Meanwhile, a project into xenotransplantation is currently being undertaken as part of a European biomedical program and will focus on the ethical and social problems in early clinical trials of xenotransplantation (the unknown risk of virus infection from the xenograft and how to recruit participants in an ethical way), animal rights and animal welfare issues and the problem of social acceptance. Following lengthy investigation of this subject, my views regarding the issue are, as yet, unclear. The arguments surrounding this issue are very much utilitarian and, as a result, one would need to take time to study and consider both viewpoints of the situation before reaching a valid conclusion. However, it appears reasonable that current research in xenotransplantation should continue at the experimental level preferably using a discordant model such as the pig. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Examine how Benthams utilitarianism may be applied to one ethical issue of your choice. ...

    If the transplantation is motivated by economic reasons, Bentham would still say that it is morally right, as both sides have decided the transaction is for their benefits, therefore creating greatest good for greatest number. If the transplantation is non-voluntary or involuntary, Bentham would still be for this, as his

  2. Consider the arguments for and against paid organ donation.

    It is true that the donor is the only person in the transplant procedure who does not physically benefit, however it must be considered that most live donors today are donating as a result of a loved one needing a transplant, so the gain from this relative or friend living

  1. Arguing against the death penalty. Truly there is no purpose to the Death Penalty ...

    Where is the necessity in the Death Penalty? Even though the entire system is hopelessly misguided, one can see that, even within it, there are still other alternatives. There are many reasonable, less controversial, and far more efficient methods of dealing with serious crime within our corrupt system without going to such extremes as the routine slaughtering of human beings.

  2. Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality

    which states "In Sacred Scripture homosexual acts are condemned as a serious depravity and even presented as a sad consequence of rejecting God. This judgment of scripture does not, of course, permit us to conclude that all those who suffer from this anomaly are personally responsible for it, but it

  1. The Ethical Debate Concerning Cloning.

    He sees the possibility for good in cloning and believes that the idea has not been carefully thought out. Wilson begins by presenting two philosophical arguments against cloning. The first objection to cloning is that it violates God's will. Wilson rejects this argument on the basis that IVF also creates embryos outside of the female body.

  2. Explain the religious and ethical views on key issues surrounding the abortion debate.

    Natural law would generally prohibit abortion. Supporters of this theory see the act of sexual intercourse as an efficient cause that brings about the final cause of the production of a human being. Abortion prevents the final cause from being achieved and is therefore immoral.

  1. Medical Ethics And Organ Transplants

    The system would mean that you would have to actively ?opt out? of donation your organs. However a third of people who donate organs already feel that an opt out system would take the altruistic nature of the UK system.

  2. How are religious and ethical principles used in the abortion debate?

    However some moral theologians would question this, for instance a baby born without a brain mat be human as it is made of human tissue, but perhaps would not necessarily be regarded as a 'person.' Michael Tooley in his article 'Abortion and Infanticide' concludes that if a being lacks consciousness

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work