• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Aim; 1)To prepare a standard potassium dichromate solution 2)To standardize the ammonium iron(II) sulphate solution 3)To determine the given unknown potassium permanganate solution 4)To estimate the concentration of hydrogen peroxide

Extracts from this document...


Course Code: 13554/Y1 Student Name: Chow Man Chung Lam Kwok Kei Lee Long Sing Chan Ka Chun Date performed: 29th September, 2010 Experiment 4: Reduction Titration I Objective: 1) To prepare a standard potassium dichromate solution 2) To standardize the ammonium iron(II) sulphate solution 3) To determine the given unknown potassium permanganate solution 4) To estimate the concentration of hydrogen peroxide Apparatus & equipments used: 1) Burette, 50mL capacity 2) Bulb pipette, 25mL capacity 3) Volumetric flask, 250mL capacity Chemicals used: 1) Potassium dichromate solid 2) Potassium permanganate solution, 0.02M 3) Dilute sulphuric acid solution, 2.5M 4) Hydrogen peroxide sample solution 5) Fe2+ Solution, approx. 0.1M 6) N-phenylanthranilic acid indicator 7) Barium diphenylamine sulphonate indicator, 1% aq. Results and Data Treatment: Weighting Data: Mass of vial: 6.3545g Mass of vial and Potassium dichromate: 7.5975g Mass of Potassium dichromate: 1.2430g Resulting Potassium dichromate solution made up to: 250.0cm3 Titration I: Standardization of iron(II) ...read more.


2 3 4 Final burette reading (cm3) 24.45 24.20 48.40 24.30 Initial burette reading (cm3) 0.00 0.00 24.20 0.00 Volume of titrant used (cm3) 24.45 24.20 24.20 24.30 Average volume: 24.23 cm3 Calculation: ? due to last titration I's calculation ?Number of mole of Fe2+ = 0.002535 Molarity of Fe2+ solution = 0.002535 / (24.23/1000) = 0.1046 ~ 0.10M Titration II: Determination of the potassium permanganate solution Titrant (in burette): Potassium Permanganate Solution Titrate (in Conical flask): 25.0cm3 of Fe2+ Solution Indicator used: Potassium Permanganate Solution Colour of indicator changed from: Green to Pink Titration No. 1(trial) 2 3 4 Final burette reading (cm3) 24.90 49.50 24.70 49.30 Initial burette reading (cm3) 0.15 24.90 0.00 24.70 Volume of titrant used (cm3) 24.75 24.60 24.70 24.60 Average volume: 24.63 cm3 Calculation: Number of mole of Fe2+ = (0.1046)(25.0/1000) ...read more.


(100%) = 7.6656 ~ 7.67% Volume concentration of H2O2 = (7.67/6.8)(22.4) = 25.26588 volume ~ 25.27 volume Discussion: 1. Deep colour of potassium permanganate solution will show out two meniscuses but according to burette using, we are try to measure the volume by different. Therefore if we technically use the same meniscuses in the all reading, it will be fine for the experiment. 2. Store the dilute hydrogen peroxide in a cool, dry and well-ventilated area. Also put it in a steel or glass and opaque container. On the other hand, keep away from heat, flame and light. Conclusion: In titration I, we standardize the iron(II) solution is 0.10M with N-phenylanthranilic acid indicator and Barium diphenylamine sulphonate indicator. In titration II, we determined the potassium permanganate solution is 0.02M. In titration III, we estimated the dilute hydrogen peroxide is 0.038g and we found out the molarity of it is 0.045M. And for the original hydrogen peroxide's percentage is 7.67%(w/v) and volume concentration is 25.27 volume. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Inorganic Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Inorganic Chemistry essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Determining the concentration of acid in a given solution

    5 star(s)

    There are class sets of pipettes of 10cm3 and 25cm3. I have a large amount of sulfuric acid, so I am not limited to using small volumes of sulfuric acid each time. A pipette measuring 10cm3 is accurate to �0.04cm3, so has a percentage error of 0.4%.

  2. effects Concentration and Temperature on the Rate of Reaction

    Water in large amounts. Explosion Risk of fire and explosion on contact with combustible substances and reducing agents. n/a In case of fire: keep drums etc. cool by spraying with water. Inhalation Cough. Sore throat. Breathing protection. Fresh air, rest. Refer for medical attention.

  1. Bleaching experiment. Estimation of available chlorine in commercial bleaching solution.

    For a more clear explanation, it could be accounted for by these ways: First, it is unnecessary to measure the accurate amount of potassium iodide because: Iodide ions must be in excess amount so as to ensure the chlorine gas evolved in reaction (1)

  2. Chem Lab report. Objective: To determine the concentration of potassium manganate(VII) solution using ...

    Ethanedioic acid was poured into a 250.0 cm3 volumetric flask and it was made up to the graduation mark using deionized water. 4. The volumetric flask was shaken upside down for 3 times. 5. 25.0 cm3 of ethanedioic acid was pipetted into a conical flask.

  1. determination of the percentage of oxalate in iron (II) oxalate by redox titration

    Mass of plastic bag with iron (II) oxalate crystal is 3.773g Mass of plastic bag without iron (II) oxalate crystal is 1.141g Mass of iron (II) oxalate crystal = 3.773g - 1.141g = 2.632g Calculation Percentage by mass of FeC2O4 in the sample The equation of the reaction: 3MnO4- +

  2. PPA1 Preparation of Potassium Trioxalatoferrate

    * The solution was covered and stored in a dark cupboard to allow crystallisation to occur. * The crystals were filtered then washed with a 1 : 1 mixture of Ethanol and water.

  1. The preparation, analysis, and reactions of an ethanedioate complex of iron

    = 5.649 y~6 ?the formula of the hydrated complex is K3[Fe(C2O4)3]?6H2O c) no. of moles of ammonium iron(II) sulphate = 10.53g/[2(14.01)+2(32.07)+14(16.00)+20(1.01) +55.85] = 0.0268mol no. of moles of complex= 5.925/539.01 = 0.011mol Percentage yield of the complex= _______no. of mole of iron in the complex______ no.

  2. Preparation and Standardization of 0.010 M EDTA

    In terms of precision, the relative standard deviation for the experiment was 1.04 ppt, which implies that the measurements were all "quantitative and precise," according to Christie Enke since the value is within 10ppt.1 Since there was no true value established for this lab, this experimental value could not be evaluated for accuracy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work