• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8

# An Investigation into how electrons move

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

An Experiment to Investigate How Fast Electrons Move

Method

We set up the apparatus as shown below but instead of a microscope slide we used a petri dish.  When the switch was closed a coloured band of manganate (VII) ions moved towards the positive terminal.

In order to measure the drift velocity of these ions we drew two lines on the filter paper and dropped the potassium manganate crystals between the negative terminal and first line.  As the crystals drifted across the first line, we started stopwatches, one for each crystal.  We stopped the stopwatches as they drifted across the second line.  We then divided displacement by time to find the velocity of each crystal.

Measurements

Before commencing the experiment, we considered what precautions we could take to ensure accuracy.  We drew start and finish lines on each piece of filter paper used, measuring the distance between the lines with a vernier calliper to achieve the most accurate reading that we could with the equipment available.  We adjusted the voltage from the power supply whilst reading from a voltmeter (set to 600v) so that we could ensure the best accuracy possible from our voltage readings.  We used

Middle

0.00058

We noted that, in general, that velocity increased with voltage.  However, our readings taken at approximately 200v (201v in this case) did not support this theory.  We decided to repeat the experiment for this voltage and obtained the following results

 Potential differencesrecorded(v) Average Potential Difference (v) Distance Moved (m) Time Taken (s) Average time taken (s) Average Velocity (m/s) No variation 200 0.0099 22.06 45.07 37.13 34.75 0.00028

We noted that we had obtained similar results and we decided that our original findings should be included as a valid result for this experiment.  Our original readings and not the second readings for approximately 200v have therefore been used to draw conclusions from this experiment.

Theory

Generally we consider the drift velocity of a flow of electrons as opposed to the speed of any one particular electron.  However it is impossible to measure this.  Instead, we investigated the drift velocity of manganate (VII) ions as a comparison.  Initial observations suggest that the ions must be negatively charged, like electrons, to be attracted to the positive terminal and that they appear to move slowly although increase the voltage appears to increase the velocity.

If we were to calculate the drift velocity of a flow of electrons through a wire, we would use the equation v = I/(nAe), where v is the drift velocity, n is the number of electrons in a unit volume of the wire, I is the current flowing and e is the charge of an electron.

We derive this from the knowledge that Q = I x t.  We know that in a certain amount of time, Q will pass through all points in the wire

We can calculate the distance that this electron moves in the same amount of time by using the equation distance = speed x time, so all electrons in a length of wire will pass through all points in the wire so

Q = (volume of wire of length (v t))  × number of electrons per unit volume × e = A v t n e

I t = A v t n e

And dividing both sides by t gives

I = n A v e

However, since we are measuring the drift velocity of coloured ions through a medium, we cannot use this equation.  We therefore decided to plot a graph of average velocity against voltage to see if there was a linear relationship i.e. v = kV (Graph 1), where k would be determined by the gradient of the straight line.  We noted that whilst the velocity of the ions did appear to increase as the potential difference increased, with the exception of our readings at approximately 200 volts, there was no linear relationship.  We then considered the possibility that there may be a relationship in the form v = kVª.  We therefore plotted a graph (Graph 2) of log v against log V to determine if there was a linear relationship where a would be determined by the gradient.

 Potential Difference (v) Log of Pd Velocity (m/s) Log of velocity 102 2.01 0.000080 -4.10 149 2.17 0.00033 -3.48 201 2.30 0.00029 -3.54 249 2.40 0.00053 -3.28 296 2.47 0.00058 -3.24

We did this because if v = kVª, then log v = log kVª so Log v = a log kV

Where Log v is plotted on the y axis, log kV is plotted on the x axis (assuming k is one for the purposes of this experiment) and a would be the gradient.  No linear relationship was found.

In conclusion, from graph 1, I have determined the gradients and therefore the relationship v=kV at varying voltages.

 Potential difference (v) K (constant) 100 0.00006/30 = 0.0000020 150 0.00011/25 = 0.0000044 200 0.00009/50 = 0.0000018 250 0.00008/65 = 0.0000012 300 0.00003/35 = 0.00000086

Conclusion

v = kV where k = 1/1000000 becomes

v = (1/1000000)V +/- 17.82 % = (1/1000000)V +/- 0.0000001782

In order to improve the experiment I would measure the Potassium Manganate (VII) as it appeared that smaller quantities took longer than larger ones, although this could be partly due to diffusion.  I would also consider trying to keep the paper in the dish in constant contact with the circuit however this would lead to its own problems in that I would then be unable to remove and replace the filter paper.  I would also measure the current so as to calculate the resistance of the filter paper.

Ideas for further research

Despite being advised that the quantity of potassium managate (VII) used would not affect the results of the experiment, our observations suggested that larger quantities had a greater drift speed.  I would therefore suggest that an investigation into this, using the same set up as above but controlling the quantity of potassium manganate (VII) used, may be appropriate further research.  This in turn may lead to a recommendation that this experiment should be carried out again using a controlled quantity of the substance or, alternatively, validate that the varying quantities used did not affect our results.

We also noticed that varying the quantity of ammonia solution affected results.  Further research could be done into what the optimum amount of solution is for this experiment in order to improve results further and minimise errors caused by diffusion.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Electrical & Thermal Physics section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Electrical & Thermal Physics essays

1. ## The aim of my investigation is to determine the specific heat capacity of aluminium.

= A ?' A' i.e. ? = A ?' A' This method is based on the assumption that the rate of loss of heat is directly proportional to the temperature difference between the body and its surroundings. On my graph showing my results for my trial run I can calculate the cooling correction using the method above, Where ?

2. ## A2 Viscosity investigation

10.8x10 +or-0.09x10 149x10 5.55 x10 60 x10 74.65 72.34 85.13 7.75x10 +or- 0.70x10 Anomalous results circled and not included in averages. To find the velocity I have used the equation v= (where v= velocity, s= distance and t = time).

1. ## resistivity if a nichrome wire

Impurities: they might have been impurities within the wire that affected my results and reduced the reliability. To reduce this in future, I would use a different wire samples. The main huge source of error is the calculation of the cross sectional area of the wire.

2. ## I am going to investigate what the resistivity is of a pencil lead. ...

The reason I thought that temperature might have caused this was because I noticed that the pencil lead was warm by the end of the experiment. To prevent this from happening in the real experiment I will turn the power off after every reading to cut down the amount of time current is flowing through the pencil lead causing heat.

1. ## A comparison of females and males body dissatisfaction in young adults.

The results of the questionnaire are then recorded, being available for student to view and report on. Results from subjects that participated in the questionnaire in late 2001 were recorded. Procedure The subjects who participated in the study are anonymous, and there were no questions asked concerning height, weight, culture or socioeconomic status.

2. ## Electrical Resonance - Research and rationale.

Frequency modulated (FM) radio solves many of the problems of AM radio but at the price of higher complexity in the system. In an FM system sounds are electronically transformed into small changes in the carrier frequency. The piece of equipment which performs the transformation is called a modulator and is used with the transmitter.

1. ## Measuring The Resistivity Of A Pencil Lead.

From these results I can see that the temperature did not rise and thus affect the results. This tells me that my settings for my investigation should be : 1. Power pack set at 4V 2. Current at 0.1A Method Now I have completed the preliminary work I am able to start my main investigation.

2. ## Investigating the factors affecting the size of current flowing through a length of resistivity ...

Using the formula?? = ((V/I) x A)/l, and the values V=3.0V, A=0.000064m2, and??= 40m?m, we can predict the current values for different length values: PREDICTED VALUES Cross-sectional area, 0.000064m2 Resistivity, 40 micro ohm meters Length experiment Voltage , 3V Length of putty(l)

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to