• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An investigation into the behaviour of springs inparallel when a mass is applied.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

An investigation into the behaviour of springs in parallel when a mass is applied.

Introduction:

Springs are simple coils of wire that extend when a mass is applied to it, and if that mass does not stretch the spring beyond its elastic limit, then once the mass is removed then the spring should return to its previous position.

Robert Hooke in the 1650’s was the first scientist to carry out detailed experiments on springs, and in 1656 he published his work.

All springs have one common characteristic shown on the graph below.

image00.pngimage13.pngimage00.png

Elastic Limit: this is the stage where a mass is applied and the spring extends and when the mass is removed then the spring returns to its rest position.

Elastic Limit: this is the maximum length than a spring can be stretched to and then return to its rest position.

Plastic  Stage: this is the stage when the spring will not return to its rest position as the spring has been stretched beyond its limit.

The graph above shows the behaviour of all springs when a load is applied. Between points O and E the line of the graph is straight through the origin.

...read more.

Middle

image03.pngimage06.pngimage05.png

The diagram below shows the experiment apparatus and two springs in parallel.

image23.pngimage03.pngimage09.pngimage14.pngimage08.pngimage11.pngimage07.pngimage10.pngimage03.pngimage12.pngimage03.png


Results:

Number of Springs in Parallel

Length of Spring(s) before mass attached (mm)

Length of Spring after mass attached (mm)

Extension (mm)

Average Extension (mm)

Total Average Extension of L1

...read more.

Conclusion

y = m x +- c

5 = 40 x 0.10 +- c

5 – 4 = c

Therefore C = +1

Therefore the equation of the line of 1/extension is y = 40 x +1

Comparing the results that I obtained during the experiment, to my predicted results:

Number of Springs in Parallel

Predicted Extension (mm)

Actual Experimental Extension (mm)

Variation (mm)

Variation (%)

1

83

80

-3

3.5

2

35

39.5

+4.5

13

3

25

30.125

+5.125

21

4

20

12.6875

-7.3125

37

5

15

11.1

-4.9

26

6

10

7 ⅔

-2 ⅓

23

Looking at the results I believe that some of my predictions where reasonably accurate as but 3 (50%) of them were some way out. I believe this to be so as I thought as the number of springs increase in parallel then the springs did not ‘help’ each other as much as I anticipated that they would have. I believed that the increase in the number of springs would have caused a fall in the extension, directly proportionally.

        But when analysing the graph comparing the reciprocal of the extension against the number of springs this produced a straight line, but this straight line was of a positive nature whilst my prediction was of a negative nature. This is because the larger the extension the smaller the reciprocal so the graph would have resulted in a positive correlation line of best fit. But should we invert the reciprocal of the extension we gain a graph similar to that of my prediction.

image25.pngimage18.png

I can therefore say that my prediction in the sense that the extension would decrease as the number of springs increased at the relationship between

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Waves & Cosmology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Waves & Cosmology essays

  1. The aim of this investigation is to examine the effect on the spring constant ...

    does not actually touch the spring(s) or the weights attached to them as this could effect the results, this issue is one of the main possible causes of inaccuracy within the experiment and I will comment more on it later. During the experiments, something that must be kept constant is the portion of the spring which is being measured.

  2. Measuring spring constant using oscilations of a mass.

    Mathematically this theory came up with near accurate results but after the carrying out the procedure the results are not very reliable for a larger scale. H = 2.42 m. G = 10.14 N Kg-1 Measured Value of H = 2.50 m Actual Value Of g = 9.81 N Kg-1 Difference in H = 2.50 m - 2.42 m.

  1. Investigation on how putting springs in series and parallel affects their extension.

    133 3 131 132 4 175 4 176 175.5 5 215 5 220 217.5 6 261 6 260 260.5 7 301 7 303 302 Two Springs in Series 1st Reading Repeat Reading Average Extension (mm) Force (N) Extension (mm) Force (N)

  2. Resonance in a Closed Air Column Investigation.

    The lengths were recorded as whole numbers because it was easier estimate the resonance length as whole numbers than to record the exact figured involving decimal numbers. A systematic error in the experiment was the tube placed in the water wasn't exactly levelled to the rim of the bucket.

  1. Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram

    This pattern, however, heavily depends on the selection of stars that you use. Most HR diagrams are based on the brightest stars in the sky, which are mostly giants. A better choice is Earth's nearest neighbours (most of which are invisible to the naked eye).

  2. The Anglers Problem

    A molecule of polyethylene is nothing more than a long chain of carbon atoms, with two hydrogen atoms attached to each carbon atom. Sometimes it's a little more complicated. Sometimes some of the carbons, instead of having hydrogens attached to them, will have long chains of polyethylene attached to them.

  1. Waves and Cosmology - AQA GCE Physics Revision Notes

    The f waves would now occupy a shorter distance of (v ? vs), the wavelength would be (using the above equation): ? = Whereas the change in wavelength would be: ?? = - [ ] = Rearranging the two equation gives: f = and f = Equating them would give

  2. I intend to investigate whether any correlation exists between the wavelength of light exerted ...

    This is why gradient is being used as a consistent measure across LED?s; it remains unaffected by higher/lower output voltages provided by the solar panel from different wavelength LED?s. I would then repeat this 10 more times to have 10 different values for the gradient (rate of voltage increase).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work