• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5

# An Investigation to the relationship between the distance the crater is dropped from a the size of the resultant crater.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

An Investigation to the relationship between the distance the crater is dropped from a the size of the resultant crater.

Strand P - Planning your investigation.

A crater is a bowl-shaped depression on the surfaces of planets and other bodies in the solar system.  A lot  craters on the earth are formed by volcanic activity although a lot of craters are formed by meteorites.  I am going to use a 88g ball which will replace the meteorite and I will measure the diameter of impact on the sand which replaces the crater.

Prediction: I predict that as the height increases the diameter of the crater will increase too.  I predict this because I know that a force called gravity pulls things of a certain weight down to earth.  An 88g ball will definitely be pulled down to earth by gravity.  The reason I think the higher the fall the larger

Middle

400

45

450

46

500

47

My results did not vary from a decent enough different in results, I though that the higher the fall of the plasticine ball the larger the diameter of the crater.  This was true but the change was ever so slight.  I figured there was no point plotting these results in a graph because the line would be almost horizontal with a slight positive correlation.

I think that my results showed so little change because the wet sand worked a bit like an adhesive, this probably explains why the sand almost took the same diameter of the ball.  If I change the sand from wet sand to dry sand the impact will in my opinion will more effect upon the diameter of the crater.  I am also going to take twice as much readings  so that the reading will go from 50mm – 1000mm this will make the graph more accurate.

New Method

Conclusion

Strand E - Evaluation.

The method I used in collecting results was good, I had no problems taking measurements or getting the right height.  I had no problems with the accuracy, observations or measurements in obtaining my results.  My first couple of results were a little bit worrying because they showed quite a big gap but they turned into a positive correlation towards the end, I don’t think this was due to inaccurate readings or to any other fault of my own.  If I was to conduct this experiment again I would take more readings so that I could have enough evidence to support a firm conclusion. If I was to extend this experiment I would have collected more data on the diameter and I would have collected results on the depth of the crater, then I could find the relationship between the depth of the crater and the diameter of the crater, this would provide me with additional evidence for the conclusion.

Richard Carter 10FD

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Mechanics & Radioactivity section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Mechanics & Radioactivity essays

1. ## Catapult Investigation

3 star(s)

Different surfaces have different friction level. A good example of this is rubber and plastic. (rubber tends to act with more friction on objects and plastic less) The data collected in the preliminary experiment helped us a lot in the final experiment. Without the trial experiment we would not have known how far to pull the elastic band back.

2. ## Helicopter Investigation

Some may choose for the A4 to be coloured but I will just leave it to be plain. In our class lesson Mr Findley (our physics teacher,) has given us an information sheet, which includes of the carcass drawing of the paper helicopter.

1. ## Parachute Investigation

Weights which have more mass experience a greater downward force of gravity. They will have to accelerate for a longer period of time before there is sufficient upward air resistance to balance the large downward force of gravity. So in conclusion, the heavier weights (56.8g, 71.0g)

2. ## Objectives: To determine the center of gravity of a body of irregular shapes

and then the bob is not under SHM. The equations used all cannot be applicable in the calculation process. If we still use wrong data in the calculation, incorrect gravitation acceleration will be obtained. Results & Calculations The values of period and the gravitation acceleration in the experiment can be

1. ## physics investigation- stopping distance

Ball 2(cm) 1 137 94 2 122 100 3 130 98 4 123 101 5 121 102 Average 126.6 99 Analysis As I expected when the dropping height was increased the relationship is the same just the distances are longer, I soon realised a fatly floor in my experiment the

2. ## Sliding beaker investigation.

Let go of the elastic band so that it propels the beaker forwards. 7. Measure how far the beaker has gone and repeat with a force of 4, 6, 8 and finally 10N. I predict that when we use a force of 10 Newtons to propel the beaker, it will travel further than if we used a smaller force.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to