• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Chemistry determination of RAM of lithium

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

ANALYSIS: Method 1: Measure the volume of hydrogen produced when a known mass of lithium reacts with water. Set up apparatus. 250cm� conical flask must contain 100cm� of distilled water. Weigh between 0.08g and 0.13g of lithium. Record the exact mass of lithium. Remove the stopper, add lithium to the flask and quickly replace stopper. Collect the gas and record final volume of hydrogen. RESULTS: I used 0.08g of lithium, this produced 168cm� of hydrogen gas. Treatment of results: Assuming that 1 mole of gas occupies 24,000cm3 at room temperature and pressure Calculating the number of moles of hydrogen: 168 / 24000 = 0.007 mol Number of moles of lithium: 0.007 x 2 = 0.014 mol Using above info and original mass of lithium, RAM of lithium can be calculated as: 1 / 0.014 x 0.08 = 5.7142 Method 2: Titration of aqueous LiOH with 0.100 mol dm HCl. ...read more.

Middle

Chronic (long-term) occupational exposure to hydrochloric acid has been reported to cause gastritis, chronic bronchitis, dermatitis, and photosensitization in workers. Prolonged exposure to low concentrations may also cause dental discoloration and erosion Evaluation: The overall accuracy of the experiment was not very high due to apparatus and methodological errors. The main source of error procedure-wise was titrating the LiOH solution and determining when the solution became clear. Measurements of lithium metal were fairly accurate due to use of digital weighing scales, however, when using a water bath to determine amount of hydrogen released, accuracy was not superb. Repetition of the titration allowed for more reliable results as 2 results became 0.2cm� off each other. Calculation of a mean titre also helped accuracy. APPARATUS ERROR IN ACCURACY EFFECT OF ERROR ON RESULT IMPROVEMENT REASON FOR IMPROVEMENT Upside down gas cylinder in water bath Measured to 1 cm�. ...read more.

Conclusion

solution taking longer to titrate and vice-versa Add a specific amount of phenolphthalein, for example 10cm� If consistent amount of phenolphthalein is added then titration will be more reliable Shaking of solution Whilst titrating, the flask may have been shaken more or shaken less Shaking the flask, distributes molecules more equally so therefore titration is faster Use an electronic shaker Better results can be achieved if consistency is ensured. Equal distribution will result in fair accurate results Validity of results: Although there were some major sources of error, I believe this experiment to be valid. Accuracy was maintained at a level sustainable in a classroom. Extraneous variables were controlled to the best of my ability. Reliability of results: Due to having achieved two results within 0.2cm� of each other I would have to say my results are reliable. Consistency in methodology was sustained and this allowed for greater accuracy of results. Aminul Hoque AS Chemistry Coursework: Determination of the relative atomic mass of Li ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Inorganic Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Inorganic Chemistry essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Deducing the quantity of acid in a solution

    5 star(s)

    Therefore, this means that we have calculated that the concentration of acid we were given was exactly 0.124mol/dm3 Evaluation The expected final concentration was 0.12 mol/dm3. As the results show a final concentration of 0.124 mol/dm3, we see that despite the result is not far away from the aimed one, it is still a bit higher than it.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Investigation to determine the Relative atomic mass of Li

    5 star(s)

    This means it must be kept in oil for as long as possible, until ready to be used, minimising exposure to the air. Gloes must be used when handling. Hydrochloric acid is corrosive and an irritant, even though only weak concentrations are being used eye protection and lab coats should be used throughout.

  1. effects Concentration and Temperature on the Rate of Reaction

    a negative correlation between temperature and time taken for the solution to turn colourless - as the temperature of the reactants is increased, the time taken for the solution to turn colourless decreases. Graph 6 shows that there is a positive correlation between temperature and reaction rate - as the temperature of the reactants is increased, the reaction rate increases.

  2. Titration Coursework

    If I by any chance overfill it, I will have the start all over again as overfilling it would alter its concentration. 6. Having mixed the distilled water and sodium carbonate together, I will then mix the solution in the volumetric flask by inverting it 10 times with the lid on.

  1. Lab report Determination of Enthalpy Change of Neutralization

    On top of that, we had used the measuring cylinder to measure 25 cm3 of acid or alkali which is less precise than using the pipette to get 25cm3 of acid or alkali. As the volume we got was not equal to exact 25 cm3 of acid or alkali, the

  2. relative atomic mass of lithium

    HAZARDS 1. Lithium is a very reactive element and reacts vigorously with water. Keep it well away from water when preparing the experiment and if it's not being used then put it back into the oil container. Make sure protective gloves are on when handling lithium and attach rubber stopper properly on the conical flask to prevent hazards occurring.

  1. DETERMINING THE MASS OF LITHIUM

    This gives the evidence that method 1 is more consistent. The titres was accurate all 3 titres within 0.1 of each other. Because I collected the hydrogen gas produced only once, I can't compare how accurate the result is. If I had used different mass of lithium and collected different

  2. MASS OF LITHIUM

    This gives the evidence that method 1 is more consistent. The titres was accurate all 3 titres within 0.1 of each other. Because I collected the hydrogen gas produced only once, I can't compare how accurate the result is. If I had used different mass of lithium and collected different

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work