• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Concern grows over genetically modified food.

Extracts from this document...


Concern grows over genetically modified food By Paul Mitchell and Keith Lee 21 November 1998 In January this year, a researcher at the Rowett Research Institute in Scotland said of genetically modified food, "If left to me, I would certainly not eat it. We are putting new things into food which would have not been eaten before. The effects on the immune system are not easily predictable and I challenge anyone who will say that the effects are predictable." On the basis of his recent research, the scientist concerned, Dr. Arpad Pusztai, repeated the warnings on the TV program World In Action on August 10. The next day, the director of the Rowett Research Institute ordered an investigation. Within days the director announced that he had impounded Dr. Pusztai's data and Dr. Pusztai was going to retire. Dr. Pusztai is a world authority in plant chemicals research and has worked for 35 years at the institute, publishing 270 scientific papers. He strongly believes in the benefits that genetic modification can bring to humanity, but says biotechnology companies are introducing the new technology too quickly and with insufficient research. Scientists first discovered the technique of genetic modification in the 1970s. It has great potential and is moving ahead very rapidly. ...read more.


Biotechnology is big business and enormous potential profits are at stake. The global crop protection market alone is worth $20 billion. Companies like Monsanto, Dupont and Novartis spend billions on the research and production of genetically modified food. The Rowett Research Institute, like many scientific establishments, has become increasingly dependent on the financial support of these companies because of government cuts. Monsanto has just spent $3.2 billion acquiring two companies, and forming a joint venture with a third, that have research, seed production and processing capabilities. It has also spent $6.5 billion buying up seed businesses, recently acquiring Cargill's international seed operation. By the end of the century four to five companies will dominate global seed supplies. The development of global planning and production of food could be the means to eradicate poverty and hunger, but it will not happen if left in the hands of the biotechnology companies. The intense competition for markets and to realise a profit on investments undermines the possibility of planning in a co-operative and systematic way. Monsanto's shareholders have seen a four-fold increase in their shares since 1994, but were unhappy recently when the company reported profits of only �294 million dollars on sales of �7.5 billion. ...read more.


Instead, the result has been the increased development of huge agribusinesses in the West "overproducing" and creating "food mountains" whilst millions starve in the Third World. Small farmers in both areas are ruined. It is cheaper for small farmers in Mexico to buy North American maize in their local markets than it is to grow their own. The development of genetically modified crops will exacerbate this development. In the struggle to dominate the market, the biotechnology companies do not look kindly on opposition to their plans and they have some very powerful allies. Fourteen US states have made it illegal to spread "falsely and damaging information about food". Two journalists are suing Fox TV who fired them after they refused to broadcast a program about Monsanto's modified cattle growth hormone. Jane Akre, one of the journalists, explained how they wanted to tell "the truth about a giant chemical company and a powerful dairy lobby. That used to be something investigative reporters won awards for. As we've learned the hard way, it's something you can be fired for these days". It appears the action taken against Dr. Pusztai relates to his TV warnings. Soon after his enforced retirement was announced, the printers of the Ecologist magazine pulped an edition devoted entirely to Monsanto. A spokesperson for the magazine thought the printer's lawyers might have advised them to destroy the magazine out of fear of being sued. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity essays

  1. Marked by a teacher


    4 star(s)

    Lauren then collaborated with her doctor and therapist and together they came up with a treatment planning process. In order for my service user to control her symptoms, she would do different things such as: - Monitor her symptoms and moods - Speak to close friends and friendships - She

  2. patterns of growth and development

    They can put a spoon, cup into their mouths however the judgement is no very good yet. A brick tower can be made of 2 bricks. By 18 months they can feed themselves completely and make a tower with 3 bricks.

  1. Free essay

    Outline the impact on the evolution of plants and animals of: ...

    * The Genotype is the genetic composition of an organism. * The Phenotype is the appearance of an organism. Mendel's Monohybrid Crosses: * Mendel only studied one pair of characteristics at a time (e.g. stem height) * This type of breeding experiment is called a monohybrid cross * Mendel first bred one variety of pure-breeding plant (e.g.

  2. Genetic Modification

    It is interesting that the mutations in the telethonin gene cause disruption of this functionally important carboxy-terminal region. A)B) Figure 1. Analysis of the telethonin protein in muscle samples. (A) Double immunofluorescence labelling for dystrophin (green) and telethonin (red), showing a typical sarcomeric banding pattern in a control muscle a

  1. Genetically modified foods have been proven safe but the hysteria surrounding them has been ...

    Step Two - Inserting the Gene The gene then can be inserted in several ways. First, scientists count on the unusual bacteria, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, to piggyback or carry, genes from one unrelated plant to another. The bacterium enters only dead, broken plant cells.

  2. GM food stuffs.

    A vector is usually a virus, because a virus is a natural carrier that infects a host. Genetic engineers attach a piece of DNA to the viral vectors and then insert the vector into the host organism so that the organism's cells can be penetrated by this virus, thus delivering the new DNA fragment.

  1. gm food

    The first genetically modified plant, a tobacco plant, which was resistant to the antibiotic kanamycin, was only created in 1983 by a biotech company called Monsanto. Moreover, the first GMF that appeared on the market was as late as 1994, so do we really know enough about the long term consequences of eating GMF?

  2. Genetically Modified Organisms in New Zealand.

    The genetics of our generation has also been altered by the increase in radiation we have been exposed to, which has increase the rate of mutation, and therefore rate of evolution, and therefore again altered our genetic makeup. Furthermore the altering of the success of alleles within human gene pools

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work