Describe the principles and limitations of transmission and scanning electron microscopes. Specific reference should be made to magnification and resolution

Authors Avatar

Describe the principles and limitations of transmission and scanning electron microscopes.Specific reference should be made to magnification and resolution

Introduction

Microscopy  has a major role in cytology.From the very beginning researchers have tried to develop ways of looking directly at living cells.This examination has revealed much about the morphology of cells and tissues.In recent years,development in microscopes,dyes,staining and preparatory techniques have helped reveal even more about the structure and function of cells.Microscopes  have a certain magnification and resolving power.In any microscope the the resolving power is more important than the magnification.The resolving power of a microscope is the least distance between two objects where the microscope can still distinguish the objects as being separate.It is a measure of detail that can be seen.A microscope with a high resolving power enables us to view images with a high resolution.With a low resolution they would be viewed as one object.Microscopes with a  high magnification are only able to increase the size of the object that is being viewed.The resolution will be the same.(ie the object will still lack clarity and appear fuzzy).The two types of microscopes are electron and light microscopes.

Join now!

Principles and Limitations of light microscopy

    Light microscopes function by focussing a beam of light on the object to be examined.The beam passes through a series of lenses after passing through the specimen.The condenser lens focuses the light onto the specimen for maximum illumination.The lower objective lens magnifies the object ,and the image from this lens is further enlarged when viewed through the upper eyepiece lens.The beam from the light source directly enters the observer’s eye.It has a few limitations.Material to be examined by light microscopy must be sufficiently transparent and thin enough for light to ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Avatar

The quality of the writing in this essay is only average, at times it is difficult to read and it feels more like an amalgamation of facts, therefore the essay does not flow as well as it could. You could improve this by taking the time to write out a plan and carefully thinking about what you want to say, it is also important to make sure that you spilt your writing up in paragraphs, do no simply write everything on one topic into a single paragraph, the general rule of thumb is that you should start a new paragraph when you begin discussing a new point/idea. In addition to this there are one or two spelling errors which could have been avoided had the candidate taken the time to carefully proof read their work.

The candidate gives a reasonable amount of detail on each type of microscope and they have clearly discussed the limitations for each. However they could have made the this essay more interesting to read by providing diagrams or images of the microscopes, by doing this you can refer to the images when discussing specific parts such as lens and this can help the reader understand what you are talking about. In addition to this the candidate could also have taken the time to undergone independent research, perhaps on the history of the microscope and how they were developed, this extra information shows interest in your subject and can make the essay more enjoyable to read. Finally, though the candidate has written a suitable conclusion, they have failed to summarise their key points, this is useful as it helps to tie together any lose ends and bring the essay to a close. In addition to this you are more likely to leave the reader with a good impression of your work if you write a personal reflection into your conclusion, this is because your teacher/examiner is interested in what you have to say and what you have learnt by writing your essay.

The candidate has used headings to split up the sections of information, which is fine, though their introduction is unclear and it reads more like a secondary paragraph. It is often easier to leave your introduction until last, that way you can make it clear to the reader exactly what your plan to discuss, which is the main point of your introduction. You also need to include a brief description of you topic, in this case you should describe what a microscope is and what it used for. As the title of this essay is ‘Describe the principles and limitations of transmission and scanning electron microscopes’ it is strange that the candidate starts off by discussing optical microscopes, this actually left me feeling quiet confused about the purpose of this essay. This is another reason why it is so important to state what you plan to discuss in your introduction.