• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Determination of a Rate Equation

Extracts from this document...


Determination of a Rate Equation Introduction: The rate of reaction is the rate of depletion of reactants or the formation of a product during a chemical reaction. It is expressed by units of concentration over the time taken for the reaction to take place. (Avogrados, 2010) Aim: To plan and carry out an experiment involving a graphical method to determine how the concentration of each component affect the rate of reaction in this reaction: 2HCl + Na2S2O3 --> 2NaCl + SO2 + S + H2O Background Information: Sodium thiosulphate and hydrochloric acid are both clear colourless solutions. They react together according to this equation: 2HCl + Na2S2O3 --> 2NaCl + SO2 + S + H2O When these solutions are mixed together, a yellow precipitate, sulphur, is produced. This causes the mixture to appear cloudy. The faster the rate of the reaction, the faster the solution appears cloudy. There are four basic factors that affect the rate of a reaction namely: Temperature, concentration/ pressure (in gases), physical state/ surface area of the reactants and the presence or absence of a catalyst [(Think Quest, 2008) and (WebChem, 2005)] Basic Idea: * Two sets of experiments will be carried out. In each case, the concentration for a single reactant will be varied * All other factors should remain constant * Conical flask containing the ...read more.


Once the "X" is no longer visible stop the stopwatch and record the time. 7. Step 1 to 6 will be repeated for varied concentrations of Na2S2O3 and HCl as in the tables above. NOTE!! This was per the plan, except that there was a shortage of Na2S2O3 and a new solution had to be made. (This new solution was used from the 3rd experiment of the second trial onwards) Analysis Experiment [HCl] mol/dm3 [Na2S2O3] mol/dm3 Time taken for precipitate to hide 'X' Avg. Time 1/time Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 1 0.32 0.4 19 20 18 19 0.052 2 0.32 0.2 35 32 31 32.6 0.031 3 0.32 0.1 42 44 45 43.6 0.023 4 0.16 0.4 26 22 25 24.3 0.041 5 0.08 0.4 29 31 30 30 0.033 From these two graphs I can deduce that when varied concentrations of a single solution with respect the other is plotted against the reciprocal of time 1/t, a straight graph forms in both cases. This is an indication that both Na2S2O3 and HCl are first order reactions. Hence the rate equation for this chemical reaction will be: r= k [Na2S2O3]1 [HCl] 1 Evaluation Anomalies In my first trial of the second experiment it took 35 second for the precipitate to fully 'cover' the marked paper which was slightly slower as opposed to 31 or 32 seconds which was observed in the 2nd and 3rd trials. ...read more.


Overall accuracy and reliability of techniques Even though there is a possibility that numerous amounts of the errors listed above may have been made during the course of the experiment, I think that the overall accuracy of this method was good as not too many obvious anomalous results were obtained. Modification to minimize errors Ultraviolet rays are an influential factor of the rate of reaction. The sun light that lit up part of the working area may have influenced the rate of reaction. It would have been better for the experiment to be done with the blinds closed. The temperature of each solution could have been measured before measuring out the exact quantity required for each experiment to prevent the loss of solution. Similarly, making sure to let the measuring pipette touch the solution to ensure accuracy in the volume of solution. Significant error I think most significant error I made in this experiment was in the procedure of diluting my reactants and the apparatus I used to do this. Instead of using a 50ml and 10ml measuring cylinder and a 25ml measuring pipette to dilute my reactants, I should have used 5, 10 and 25ml measuring pipettes only in order ensure accuracy in the total volume and concentration of the final diluted solution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Organic Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This experiment has a good evaluation, but a poorly written method and contains a very high level of possible error in the results.
This piece of work is 3*

Marked by teacher Brady Smith 20/02/2012

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

5 star(s)

Response to the question

The student shows a clear understanding of the topic and the work is clearly, logically and fluently presented. Their response is very explicit through the layout of the work and this helps examiners clearly identify the marks. It is commendable ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The student shows a clear understanding of the topic and the work is clearly, logically and fluently presented. Their response is very explicit through the layout of the work and this helps examiners clearly identify the marks. It is commendable that the student has referenced every source they have used to help them reach the answer to the set question - this is usually omitted and can consequently put the student in danger of writing plagiarized work. The diagram of apparatus supported the student's written work and likewise the graphs did too. However, it is important to remember that sometimes it might be required to reason the steps in the experiment. Whilst the student has done this very well, at times they have omitted this. For example, it is best to labour points such as repeating the experiment for reliability and then taking an average and so on. Such 'stating the obvious' sometimes makes it easier for the examiner to award marks as it is clearly showing that you understand the topic.

Level of analysis

The level of analysis (i.e. giving reasons to why the steps are done or guiding the examiner through the steps) is very good. The student presents this in a logical order which helps their structure of the work. This in turn improves their clarity and furthers the fact that they understand the topic and more importantly, the background knowledge to it. The student has reached a suitable conclusion from the graphs (and the experiment) and has documented it well.

Quality of writing

The spelling, grammar and punctuation are fine. The technical terms were used with fluency and were well integrated into the piece of work. However, I suggest perhaps a glossary of terms would add to show the examiner that the student understands the terms used. Yet, the one slip up was writing "Na2S2O3" instead of using the subscript which they had done otherwise. Such mistakes are rather damaging to the overall impression of the piece of work as it is one of the basics of chemistry. This flags up the importance of proof reading as such mistakes should have been picked up in proof reading the work. However, overall, this piece of work was completed to a high standard and I cannot give a lower level simply for the one slip up.

Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by crystalclearmagic 26/03/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Organic Chemistry essays

  1. The aims of this experiment are to prepare urea-methanal from urea and methanol to ...

    The polymer product was compared with plastic wrap in the following catagories. (i) Flammability (ii) Hardness (iii) Transparency (iv) Melting behavior 8. To compare the flammability and melting behavior, the 2 plastic were burnt with a Bunsen flame. 9. To compare their hardness and transparency, direct observation were taken.

  2. Objective: To produce soap via the saponification reaction of fatty acids.

    Soap allows the water to wet the surface that is being cleaned better. Soapy water tends to soak into the surface being cleaned therefore allowing the water to wash away dirt. In addition, soap grabs dirt and connects it to the water.

  1. The aim of this investigation is to analyse mummion, which is an inorganic solid ...

    carry out the experiment Evaporating basin X1 To boil the colourless mummion solution in Conical flask X1 To place 100cm3 of water in it Tripod X1 To place evaporating basin on and heatproof mat is under the evaporating basin. Bunsen burner X1 To use when boiling the mummion Filter paper

  2. Comparing the rates of hydrolysis of chloro-, bromo- and iodo- alkane

    turn colorless AgBr White precipitate and turn colorless AgI Yellow precipitate and turn colorless With sunlight observation AgCl White precipitate and turned grey AgBr White precipitate and turned grey AgI Yellow precipitate and turned grey Conclusion A. The rate of hydrolysis are as follows: iodo-alkane > bromo-alkane > chloro-alkane B.

  1. Vitamin C. I will investigate whether orange juice contains the most Vitamin C and ...

    This will mean that you actually used more than you read off your burette. * Titrate it against 25cm3 of DCPIP solution that has been measured out using one 25 ml Pipette to minimize errors. * Do a rough titration so I know roughly where the end point is.

  2. Preparation of haloalkane. The purpose of this experiment is to prepare 2-chloro-2-methylpropane from ...

    The addition was stopped until no more gaseous bubbles were observed. 12. The lower (aqueous) layer was then discarded. 13. Three spatula-measures of anhydrous sodium sulphate were added to a boiling tube. 14. The remaining organic layer in the separation funnel was poured from the top to the boiling tube.

  1. Free essay

    Experiment to determine the order of the reaction of Iodine with Acetone by using ...

    25 cm3 pipette * 10 cm3 pipette * At least 5 clean, dry conical flasks * Water trough * Burette * Measuring cylinder * 100cm3 beakers Procedures: ( for pair 2) 1. 25.0cm3 of sulphuric acid and 20.0 cm3 of acetone solution were mixed together with 5.0 cm3 of distilled

  2. The aim of this experiment was to recrystallise an impure sample of benzoic acid ...

    This is due to the fact that there is no problem with absorption peaks due to the mulling liquid and it also provides for a much better technique since it is possible to weigh the amounts of sample and KBr present in the disc [2] .

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work