• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Determination of Total Hardness in Water by EDTA Titration

Extracts from this document...


Principles of Environmental Chemistry Experiment 3: Determination of Total Hardness in Water by EDTA Titration Introduction Hardness of water is caused by divalent and multivalent metal that mainly came from contacting with the soil and rock formations. Hardness values are normally expressed in an equivalent amount of CaCO3 in mgl-1. If the hardness of water is smaller than 75mg/l, then it is described as soft water. EDTA can form very stable complex with metal ions (e.g. Mg2+ & Ca2+). The equation: M2+ + Na2H2EDTA � MEDTA2- + 2H+ + 2Na+ In this practical, EDTA (i.e. ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid) is used to determine the hardness of a water sample. EDTA can form very stable complex with metal ions (e.g. Mg2+ & Ca2+) i.e. M2+ + Na2H2EDTA � MEDTA2- + 2H+ + 2Na+ EDTA is added from a burette to the hard water sample and form (MEBT)- complex. At the equivalence point, EDTA removes the metal ion from the (MEBT)- by forming the more stable(MEBTA)-2 complex and free EBT- molecule that is blue in color. ...read more.


/ 3 = 10.40ml Determination of hardness of an unknown water sample (25-ml was used) Trail 1 2 3 Initial Reading 0.00 19.50 10.60 Final Reading 19.50 39.00 30.50 Volume of EDTA used (ml) 19.50 19.5 19.90 Average volume of EDTA used = (19.5+19.5+19.9) / 3 = 19.63ml Data treatment and Questions: Standardization of EDTA Solution Ca2+(aq) + EDTA4-(aq) ? [CaEDTA]2-(aq) Molarity of standard calcium chloride = 0.008 M Volume of standard calcium chloride used = 25 ml No. of moles of standard calcium chloride in 25 ml = 0.008 X 0.025 = 2 x 10-4 mole From the equation above, mole ratio of EDTA: calcium chloride = 1: 1 No. of moles of EDTA used = 2 x 10-4 moles Volume of EDTA solution used= 39.07/ 1000 = 0.03907 dm3 The molarity of EDTA solution = 2 x 10-4 / 0.03907 dm3 = Determination of hardness of a tap water sample: Molarity of EDTA solution = 0.00512M Volume of EDTA solution used= 10.40ml = 10.40/1000 dm3 = 0.0104 dm3 No. ...read more.


It is because EDTA solution made by the latter method is not stable, it is hygroscopic hence it cannot be a primary standard solution. We have to standardize it by calcium chloride solution. On the other hand, calcium chloride solution is a bit unstable indeed, hence the way to produce calcium chloride solution would be from calcium carbonate, which is the "real" primary standard as it is stable enough, in order to produce calcium chloride by reaction. At the second titration, which is EDTA being titrated over tap water, the titrant volume of EDTA is recommended to over 10ml at least. The larger the volume used, the more accurate the result. As error would be minimized due to the following equation: Use the burette with a narrower meniscus to decrease the observation error. The larger the sample size, the smaller the relative error. Precaution: 1. While adding indicator, do not put too much amount of indicator into the conical flask, otherwise the too deep colour affects the judgement of end-points of the titration. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Inorganic Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Inorganic Chemistry essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Determining the concentration of acid in a given solution

    5 star(s)

    I could mistake this as the endpoint if the colour wasn't mixed throughout the solution until all of the particles had reacted and a colour change appeared throughout. If I mistook the small area of colour change as the endpoint then I would think that the concentration of sulfuric acid

  2. effects Concentration and Temperature on the Rate of Reaction

    of data - as 1/temperature is increased, log to the base e of reaction rate decreases. To find the gradient of a straight line, you use the following equation: (7) Gradient = Change in y value Change in x value For my graph, I worked out the gradient as follows:

  1. ethanedioate complex of iron

    The crystals were separate by filtration using a sintered-glass funnel. Then it were washed twice with a mixture of equal volumes of ethanol and water, and followed by twice with acetone. The solid was allowed to air dry by suction.

  2. Lab report Determination of Enthalpy Change of Neutralization

    On top of that, we had used the measuring cylinder to measure 25 cm3 of acid or alkali which is less precise than using the pipette to get 25cm3 of acid or alkali. As the volume we got was not equal to exact 25 cm3 of acid or alkali, the

  1. Preparation and Standardization of 0.010 M EDTA

    was obtained from the lab instructor, and 3.6900 � 0.00001 g of the solid was weighed by analytical balance and quantitatively transferred into a 250-mL beaker. Using deionized water, the mass of solid was then quantitatively transferred to a 1-L plastic bottle to prevent EDTA from leaching, and the bottle

  2. Thermal Decomposition of Calcium Carbonate

    To make the experiment more accurate, there is the possibility of using a more insulated will reduce the percentage of energy lost to the surroundings. There is another possibility of using a beaker with a lid. Heat will be lost at a faster rate, which results in a higher temperature after the reaction.

  1. Finding Out how much Acid there is in a Solution

    * Balance: * Volumetric Flask (250cm3): * Pipette (25cm3): * Burette: From this, I can calculate that the total percentage error for the equipment of my investigation is 1.06%. The effect of this on my final value for the acid concentration is given by the percentage of the final value that this percentage corresponds to.

  2. Aim To study the effect of concentration of iodide ion ...

    MKI / TAVE / s ? T (s) ? T (%) T T mol dm-3 AVE AVE 1.0 29.45 0.01 0.03396 0.03396 0.11533 0.8 38.57 0.01 0.02593 0.02593 0.06724 0.4 114.82 0.01 0.00871 0.00871 0.00759 0.2 339.85 0.01 0.00294 0.00294 0.00086 0.1 1536.22 0.01 0.00065 0.00065 0.00004 Table 1.5 Y-bar uncertainties 7 The graph of rate

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work