• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

Difference in number of Stomata in different leaves

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Biology Coursework An investigation will be carried out to see how the numbers of stomata differ in different plant species. Stomata are tiny openings found on the underside of the plant leaf. [1] The pore is formed by a pair of cells called 'Guard Cells'. Guard cells control the opening of the stomata. These pores on the underside of the plant leaf allow carbon dioxide to enter. Carbon dioxide is used in photosynthesis. At the same time when the stomata are open Oxygen and water vapour escape from inside of the plant. Water vapour leaving the plant is called Transpiration. This occurs mostly in leaves of the plant but can be from the flower and the stem. Hypothesis The leaves of different plants and the sections of leaves will have different number of stomata. The amount of stomata on the plant leaf is dependant on the environment. The plants that are in temperate environment will have many more stomata than the plants that are in Tropical environments. Null Hypothesis There is no difference in the number of stomata in any plant leaf or any section of the plant. Any difference is purely due to chance I will investigate how to find out the different number of stomata in a plant leaf. Experiment Apparatus Nail Varnish Microscope Microscopic slide Lab coat Tape Plant leaf Step by Step 1- Get apparatus 2- Take a leaf from a plant and mark 3 sections, top, middle and bottom (to later investigate under the microscope) ...read more.

Middle

= 1.45 To work out the standard deviation I need to use the equation: ? (x - x)2 = 0.3 n-1= 3-2 = 2 Square root of 0.3/2 = V0.15 = 0.39 Plant used was Snowball Area of plant leaf (n) Number of Stomata (x - x) (x - x)2 Count 1 Count 2 Count 3 Average (x) Top 3 4 4 3.67 0.44 0.19 Middle 5 4 7 5.33 -1.22 1.49 Bottom 3 4 3 3.33 0.78 0.61 Mean (x) = 4.11 To work out the standard deviation I need to use the equation: ? (x - x)2 = 2.29 n-1= 3-2 = 2 Square root of 2.29/2 = V1.145 = 1.07 Plant used was Holly Area of plant leaf (n) Number of Stomata (x - x) (x - x)2 Count 1 Count 2 Count 3 Average (x) Top 19 22 18 19.67 1.55 2.40 Middle 23 23 18 21.33 -0.11 0.01 Bottom 28 19 21 22.67 -1.45 2.10 Mean (x) = 21.22 To work out the standard deviation I need to use the equation: ? (x - x)2 = 4.51 n-1= 3-2 = 2 Square root of 4.51/2 = V2.255 = 1.50 Plant used was Privet Area of plant leaf (n) Number of Stomata (x - x) (x - x)2 Count 1 Count 2 Count 3 Average (x) ...read more.

Conclusion

(O-E)2/E = 77.575 The degree of freedom here is (n-1) 2-1 = 1 so the number of classes is 2 The mean chi-squared value is 77.575 which is a very high number. This clearly rejects the null hypothesis. So the number of stomata in the plants from different environments differ is not due to pure chance but the plants have adapted to the environment over the years. Evaluation Even though the results were reliable and rejected the null hypothesis when grouped by the environment of the plant there were some limitations to how accurate the results were. Human error can cause limitations as some plant leaves had a high amount of stomata present and can be counted wrong. Accuracy of the microscope can be a limitation, some places only half of the stomata were shown or less which couldn't be counted as it wouldn't show a valid result. Improvements This experiment can be improved if more results are taken and more different types of plant leaves are used. Instead of 3 counts more counts from the same type of plant leaf can make the results more reliable. Measure the area of plant leaf used and use the same area for all the plant leaves. This will increase the reliability of the results as you will be counting in a fixed area. An electron microscope can be used to count more accurately the number of stomata located in a certain area of the leaf. Reference [1] = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stomata Visited on 14/04/08 at 6:47pm ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Exchange, Transport & Reproduction section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Response to the question

Overall a good example piece of coursework. Introduction is adequate, but could explain transpiration and the process what occurs a bit better. Sets up the scientific background for the experiment well. The hypothesis is good apart from the fact that ...

Read full review

Response to the question

Overall a good example piece of coursework. Introduction is adequate, but could explain transpiration and the process what occurs a bit better. Sets up the scientific background for the experiment well. The hypothesis is good apart from the fact that the candidate could explore why plants in tropical and temperate environments may differ in the number of stomata. Conclusion and the rejection of the null hypothesis are good. Response to the question in general is to a high level, although the science behind the experiment could be mores solid. Meaning and communication of the experiment is clear.

Level of analysis

The level of analysis is good as two different types of experiments are used and two different methods of analysis. However, the reason for using the chi squared test or standard deviation is not stated, so I am not sure why these tests were used. The amount of plants used from each climate is a good sample, but if the test was repeated there should have been a much wider range used. Improvements suggested were good, and reflected on the experiment well.

Quality of writing

Incorrect use of capitals in some places. Spelling, grammar and punctuation adequate.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by skatealexia 06/03/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Exchange, Transport & Reproduction essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Sand Dune Succession Coursework

    5 star(s)

    Small shrubs may appear for the first time. Environmental conditions at the grey dunes, around 50-100 metres from the sea, are much less hostile. There is shelter from winds and the increase in humus begins to darken the surface layers revealing soil being formed.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Biology coursework planning - the effect of lead chloride on the growth of cress ...

    5 star(s)

    The type of inhibition involved is called non-competitive inhibition. This means that the lead binds to an area of the enzyme other than the active site but eventually distorts it as well. Lead is also able to block -COOH groups on the enzymes which contributes significantly to the inhibition of enzymes as well.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Investigate the water potential of celeriac.

    5 star(s)

    I also carried out the test on celeriac. This had the least amount of reducing sugar present due. It had a very subtle colour change; from the Copper II Sulphate blue, to a faint green solution. The results showed that the carrot contained a vast amount of reducing sugar and the potato contained slightly less than the carrot.

  2. Peer reviewed

    The comparison of antibacterial properties of herbal products and standard antibiotics

    5 star(s)

    This explains the reason that penicillin is only effective against bacteria and not mammals. Mammalian cells are eukaryotic which fail to feature a cell wall, whereas bacteria cells are prokaryotic, containing a cellulose cell wall. As mentioned above, penicillin inhibits the enzymes involved with creating the cell wall, leaving the

  1. beetroot experiment

    does the temperature affects on cell membranes and that as temperature increases, protein/ plasma membrane will denature and will be damaged and this causes the red pigments to leak, just like what I've mentioned on my hypothesis. The fact that lipids will become more fluid as temperature goes up.

  2. Investigating Water Potential Of Potatoes.

    This back pressure tends to force water out of the cell and is called the pressure potential. Obviously, it opposes the continued uptake of water into the cell by osmosis. Turgor pressure reaches its maximum when the cell wall can be stretched no more.

  1. Investigation on Osmosis using a potato.

    Again in this table it is very much the same as the first experiment but there is not two points of near equilibrium this time there is only one. Another issue of this table is that if you look at the weight before column all of the potatoes have nearly

  2. Investigation into the effects of different

    They have a diploid number of 16 chromosomes which remains intact , since the budding involves mitosis, where cell division occurs resulting in the in the production of genetically identical cells, the only source of variation is via a mutation which may occur during the replication of the DNA.during Mitosis (Interphase)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work