• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the arguments for and against developing a genetic finger print profile for each member of society.

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the arguments for and against developing a genetic finger print profile for each member of society. DNA finger printing is the method for isolating and making images of sequences of DNA. The technique was first developed in 1984 by a British scientist, Alec Jeffreys, after he noticed the existence of certain sequences of DNA, called minisatellites, that do not contribute to the function of a gene but are repeated within the gene and in other genes of a DNA sample. Jeffreys determined that each living thing has a unique pattern of these minisatellites, with the exception of identical twins, just like each person has a unique finger print. But unlike a conventional fingerprint, which occurs only on the fingertip and can be altered by surgery, a DNA fingerprint is the same for every cell, tissue and organ of a person and cannot be altered. As a consequence, DNA fingerprinting is fast becoming the primary and most reliable method of identifying and distinguishing between individuals. But how reliable is it? ...read more.


Many police laboratories in the USA and Britain have begun to use DNA fingerprinting to link suspects to biological evidence - blood or semen stains, hair, or items of clothing - found at the scene of a crime. Since 1987, hundreds of cases in both countries have been decided with the assistance of DNA fingerprint evidence. DNA fingerprinting can also be used as a form of personal identification for example to determine a child's parents or the identity of a casualty. So if the DNA fingerprint of a person is so valuable and can give so much information, should a national database of everyone's DNA fingerprint be created. This way, for example, if a rape is committed, the police need only consult the DNA database and find a match for the sample they have. But many people find the idea of such a database uncomfortable and think it made lead to discrimination against individuals because of their genes. There are only a few genetic tests now available that actually predict whether a person will contract a disease or condition. ...read more.


In addition discrimination against whole groups may occur. Research on women of Jewish ancestry from Eastern Europe, for example, led to tests that predicted increased breast cancer risk in women with certain genes. This information could be used to determine eligibility and premiums for insurance or to draw broad conclusions about whether or not certain groups in society are healthy. Could this technology lead to the abortion of healthy babies just because they may contract a disease after birth? Parents who get this information have to decide whether they want to take the risk of an unhealthy child or whether they should have an abortion. On the one hand, if the child were unhealthy they would not lead a very happy life and may resent the parent for letting them live. But on the other hand, how can we be sure that the child will become ill? It is a chance that the parent has to take. And this is where science will always eventually lead us, to a moral and ethical decision. The science behind an idea may be sound and make perfect sense, but can society cope with its consequences. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    The arguments for and against developing a “genetic fingerprint” profile for all members of ...

    4 star(s)

    The advantage with this is that DNA fingerprinting works on the basis that each individual's DNA structure - or genetic make-up is unique and therefore cannot be forged, faked or altered in any way (http://www.exploreforensics.co.uk/DNA-fingerprinting.html, 02/03/2008). Therefore keeping a DNA profile for all members of society would be ideal in terms of reducing crime rates.

  2. Chromosomes and DNA

    Auxins are plant hormones. are also known as 'chemical messengers'. affect how fast parts of a plant grow. produce responses called tropisms. You should know that we can use auxins commercially to: make roots grow on cuttings. control the production of fruit.

  1. Parkinsons Disease

    The embryo, 'now with only seven blastomeres can still be implanted into the mother and assuming no defect has been found these embryos will still grow into healthy babies'4. 1. Name of article: Parkinson's Disease Url: http://www.patient.co.uk/health/Parkinson's-Disease.htm Date accessed: 15/2/10 Evaluation: The article is certified as a reliable source of health and social care information.

  2. The Biology of Autistic Spectrum Disorder and the Social Implications

    This inability to fully decipher the world around them often makes education stressful. Teachers need to be aware of a student's disorder, and ideally should have specific training in autism education, so that they are able to help the student get the best out of his or her classroom experiences.

  1. GCSE Biology Revision

    thicken before cell division -the DNA is organised in sections called Genes -Genes carry the instructions needed to create a new organism -in body cells chromosomes are found in pairs -each gene controls a particular characteristic -when a cell divides it makes a new set of chromosomes to pass on to the daughter cells How do chromosomes double?

  2. The arguments for and against developing a genetic fingerprint profile for all members of ...

    for all members of society, because with even the smallest amount of DNA evidence the criminal could be caught very quickly, without having to have the suspect brought in. It would also prevent innocent people being charged for crimes that they did not commit.

  1. Who Should Have Access To Genetic Testing Results? Should Genetic Testing Be Mandatory. ...

    Should the results of these genetic tests go on file, available to anybody who wants them, maybe to a similar nature to that of a credit agency? If this concept were to be adhered to, then, would the tests have to be mandatory?

  2. Explain how DNA fingerprinting works.

    The smaller pieces will be able to move more quickly and thus further towards the positive pole than the larger pieces. The different-sized pieces of DNA will therefore be separated by size, with the smaller pieces towards positively charges area at the top and the larger pieces towards the negatively charged area near the bottom of the agarose.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work