There is a potential for toxicity when drugs are administered transdermally, as skin thickness and blood flow in the skin can vary with age. The relatively rich blood supply in the skin combined with thinner skin, have significant effects on the pharmacokinetics of transdermal delivery systems for children [1].
In some situations this may be an advantage, while in others systemic toxicity may result. Central nervous system toxicity occurred in neonates washed with hexachlorophene because their very thin skin and large body surface area allowed toxic levels to develop from systemic drug absorption. Physicians must consider such clinical implications of these factors when prescribing a drug to be administered by the transdermal route [1].
When taken orally, many drugs are destroyed by the liver [3]. Hormones are also readily degraded and metabolised in the digestive tract and the liver. Hormones taken orally are often at a higher dose than those via transdermally administered and have their own limitations including hepatic first-pass metabolism [4]. Hence in this case a transdermal route has an advantage over other routes such as sublingual. Another advantage is that drug administration through the skin often provides a slower, more controlled alternative route for release into the blood stream [3].
Recent research shows attempts have been made to develop novel drug delivery systems for beta-blockers, including transdermal delivery systems, to circumvent the drawbacks of conventional drug delivery. Although no beta-blockers have been marketed in this form as of yet [4].
Transmucosal Routes
The respiratory tract, which includes the nasal mucosa, hypopharynx, and large and small airway structures, provides a large mucosal surface for drug absorption. Mucosal surfaces are the most common and convenient routes for delivering drugs to the body [5]. This route of administration is useful for treatment of pulmonary conditions and for delivery of drugs to distant target organs via the circulatory system [1]. The way in which drug absorption is improved via the mucosal surface is due to the absence of the stratum corneum ebidermis. The mucosal surfaces offer another advantage in the way that they provide a rich blood supply resulting in rapid drug transport to the systemic circulation, which allow an avoidance of first-pass hepatic metablism.
The amount of drug absorbed depends on the following factors [1]
- Drug concentration
- Vehicle of drug delivery
- Mucosal contact time
- Venous drainage of the mucosal tissues
- Degree of the drug's ionization and the pH of the absorption site
- Size of the drug molecule
- Relative lipid solubility
Drugs that are delivered intranasally are used for a local effect and provide safety, efficacy and greater bioavailibility [9]. Vasopressin and corticosteroids were among the first drugs to be administered by this route [1]. Aerosol systems such as metered dose inhaler, dry powder inhalers and liquid jet or ultrasonic nebulizers are used for delivery of bronchodilators and corticosteroids for asthma or COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) [9]. The advantages of the nasal cavity is that provides a large surface area and easily accessible with highly permeable and vascularised tissue through which drugs can be absorbed rapidly and directly into the systemic circulation [6]. Nasal delivery also offers the advantage of avoidance of first-pass hepatic metabolism that consumes drug before it has chance to work [7] as well the opportunity to administer a smaller dose thus reducing the associated side effects [6]. Intranasal routes are non-invasive in comparison to injections and are patient friendly. This improves patient compliance and can allow the patient to self-medicate [7].
Due to the advantages that intranasal delivery offers there has been a substantial interest in using the alveolar surface as a portal to the systemic circulation for macromolecules such as proteins and peptides [9]. A number of small and macro-molecules administered systemically via the nasal cavity are now on the market [6]. However, some macromolecular drugs such as peptides and proteins are unable to overcome the mucosal barriers and/or are degraded before reaching the blood stream. Among the approaches explored so far in order to optimize the transport of these macromolecules across mucosal barriers, is the use of nanoparticulate carriers represents a challenging but promising strategy [5].
Drug developers and researchers are discovering that the accessibility and vascular structure of the nose make nasal drug delivery an attractive method for delivering both small molecule drugs and biologics, systemically as well as across the blood-brain barrier to the CNS [8]. Currently intranasal products are largely formulated as liquids and delivered via a metered pumped spray although this method is effective it can be limited by factors such as the solubility of the drug in the vehicle, the limited capacity of the nasal cavity to hold liquid without drainage to the throat or from its anterior portion, and the stability of the formulation [6].
Rectal Transmucosal Administration
Medications may be administered by the rectal mucosal route for systemic effects if other more preferable routes are not available for the treatment of nausea and vomiting, sedation, control of seizures, analgesia, or antipyresis [1]. The rectum offers a relatively constant environment for drug delivery provided the drug is presented in a well absorbable form [10] thus proving useful when infusion techniques are not available[12]. The rate and extent of rectal drug absorption are often lower than with oral absorption, possibly an inherent factor owing to the relatively small surface area available for drug uptake[11]. However, rectal administration of drugs should be avoided in immunosuppressed patients in whom even minimal trauma could lead to formation of an abscess [1] and cannot be used in patients with diarrhea, a colostomy, hemorrhoids, anal fissures or neutropenia.[12].
For a number of drugs the extent of rectal absorption has been reported to exceed oral values, which may reflect partial avoidance of hepatic first-pass metabolism after rectal delivery [11]. The most important concern for the practitioner is irregular uptake; clinically important patient-to-patient variability exist [12]. The absorption of the drug may be delayed or prolonged, or uptake may be almost as rapid as if an intravenous bolus were administered, which may cause adverse cardiovascular or central nervous system effects [1]. The rate of delivery may determine systemic drug action and side effects (nifedipine), and it may affect the local action of concurrently administered absorption promoters on drug uptake (cefoxitin) [11]. Prolonged use is not recommended because it is uncomfortable and the expulsion of the suppository by bowel movement will affect drug absorption [12].
Recent studies corroborate the clinical relevance of rectal drug therapy, and the value of the rectal route as an alternative to parenteral administration has been assessed for several drugs, e.g. diazepam, midazolam, morphine and diclofenac [11]. Current research has been conducted into the effects of rectal and vaginal administration of insulin gel formations on the blood glucose levels as alternative routes of administration[12].
References
-
Transdermal delivery of beta-blockers.
, , .
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=16640500&query_hl=4&itool=pubmed_docsum
-
Transmucosal macromolecular drug delivery.
, , , .
- http://www.whocancerpain.wisc.edu/eng/16_1-2/alternatives.html