• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Effect of Mouthwash on E-Coli Bacteria

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Interpreting and Evaluating Mann-Whitney U test I have decided that I would like to use the Mann-Whitney U test to interpret and evaluate my data. This is because I would like to compare data sets to see whether the medians from the different brands of mouthwash I investigated were significantly different from one another as I have unmatched data and this would help me to demonstrate their differences clearly. Effect of Mouthwash on E-Coli Bacteria Results For E-Coli Result No. Mouthwash A (mm) Mouthwash B (mm) Mouthwash C (mm) Mouthwash D (mm) 1 2.14 4.65 6.22 1.81 2 1.88 3.86 5.34 1.98 3 2.46 4.39 4.82 2.12 4 2.79 4.29 6.10 1.88 5 2.74 3.35 4.98 2.06 6 2.54 3.23 5.40 1.91 7 2.81 4.12 5.83 2.43 8 1.95 3.54 5.17 1.78 9 2.65 4.16 5.51 1.65 10 2.27 3.48 5.65 1.54 Average 2.423 3.907 5.502 1.916 Average Results Mouthwash A B C D Median (mm) 2.423 3.907 5.502 1.916 Ranking the Data 1) Mouthwash C 2) Mouthwash B 3) Mouthwash A 4) Mouthwash D ? R1 (Mouthwash C) = 55.02 ? R2 (Mouthwash B) = 39.07 ? R3 (Mouthwash A) = 24.23 ? R4 (Mouthwash D) = 19.16 Comparison of Mouthwash A against B: U1 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) ...read more.

Middle

- 39.07 = 115.93 U2 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 19.16 = 135.84 Smaller Value = 115.93 Critical Value for U = 23 115.93 > 23 Comparison of Mouthwash C against D: U1 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 55.02 = 99.98 U2 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 19.16 = 135.84 Smaller Value = 99.98 Critical Value for U = 23 99.98 > 23 Effect of Mouthwash on Microccus Liteus Bacteria Result No. Mouthwash A (mm) Mouthwash B (mm) Mouthwash C (mm) Mouthwash D (mm) 1 7.30 5.04 7.86 4.21 2 7.81 6.49 7.73 4.50 3 8.45 6.98 7.62 3.38 4 8.72 5.79 7.36 3.47 5 8.64 6.24 6.89 4.95 6 7.94 5.72 6.56 4.13 7 8.58 5.37 7.34 3.91 8 8.63 5.21 6.71 3.86 9 8.36 6.13 7.25 3.22 10 7.79 5.67 7.17 3.34 Average 8.222 5.864 7.252 3.897 Order of Zone of Clearance of Microbial Decay (Highest to Lowest) ...read more.

Conclusion

+ (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 39.07 = 115.93 U2 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 55.02 = 99.98 Smaller Value = 99.98 Critical Value for U = 23 99.98 > 23 Comparison of Mouthwash B against D: U1 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 39.07 = 115.93 U2 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 19.16 = 135.84 Smaller Value = 115.93 Critical Value for U = 23 115.93 > 23 Comparison of Mouthwash C against D: U1 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 55.02 = 99.98 U2 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 19.16 = 135.84 Smaller Value = 99.98 Critical Value for U = 23 99.98 > 23 From the data collected from my statistical test I can see that ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Molecules & Cells section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay


Statistical test only** A worked example of the Mann-Whitney U test that has been calculated well but has not been interpreted at all by the candidate.
The statistic has been used correctly and calculated using the formulae for large sample size. A faster method is available for the small sample size used.
To improve- The real point of carrying out statistical tests is to see if there is true significance in the data collected and then interpret and evaluate the experiment accordingly. This candidate has unfortunately not discussed the meaning of the statistic at all.
If the U value is equal to or less than that in the U value table the null hypothesis can be rejected. The difference in these samples is significant at the 2% level.

Marked by teacher Stevie Fleming 26/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Molecules & Cells essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    An investigation into the inhibiting effect of tomato juice on the germination of cress ...

    3 star(s)

    If I plant a 100 seeds and miscount by 1, then that is a 1% error. So just by increasing the number of seeds I will drastically reduce the percentage error. I will make sure to repeat each experiment many times.

  2. Planning an experiment into the effect of mouthwash on bacteria

    The enzymic reaction is reduced because while the inhibitor is in the active site, no substrate can enter. Substrate molecules compete for the active site so the rate of reaction decreases as the higher the proportion of competitive inhibitor the slower the rate of reaction.

  1. The investigation to find the effect of glucose concentration on fermentation of yeast.

    most of the time one degree less or degree more than 40 degree Celsius. Stopwatch. There could have been problem with the timing, as there are some human errors involved when starting the reaction, and when the end points has been reached, there is possibility that I stopped the stopwatch

  2. Investigating the effect of temperature on the activity of free and immobilised enzymes.

    This difference is not significant enough to conclude that there is a difference due to errors in the experiment. Therefore, I can't draw definite conclusions from this single experiment, as there was a large percentage procedural error. I can conclude from my results that the enzyme activity or the rate

  1. The Effect of Concentration on Pectinase Using Apple

    These are the factors that would effect the experiment if they were not controlled. * Temperature Enzymes work at optimum temperatures and therefore work better at some temperatures than they do at others. A high temperature like 60�C is enough to stop the enzyme working at all.

  2. The effect of different temperatures on the movement of maggots.

    In this experiment we will investigate the preferred temperature of a maggot and by preferred I mean the temperature at which the maggot is most active. It shall be stimulated to move along a glass tube by a light at one end and a darker covered area at the other

  1. DETERMINING THE WATER POTENTIAL OF A POTATO TUBER CELLS USING THE WEIGHING METHOD.

    Pure water at standard temperature and pressure is assigned a water potential of zero. The presence of a solute in water lowers the water potential to give a solute potential s, which is therefore always negative. Osmosis should be seen as the movement of water from an area of less negative s to an area of more negative s.

  2. An experiment to find of the isotonic point of root vegetables cells in contents ...

    it should have the lowest isotonic point as the point where the net movement of water is equal will occur quicker hence at this point there will be no change in mass and length. I predict that in terms of ranking the root vegetable with the highest isotonic point will be: 1.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work