• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Effect of Mouthwash on E-Coli Bacteria

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Interpreting and Evaluating Mann-Whitney U test I have decided that I would like to use the Mann-Whitney U test to interpret and evaluate my data. This is because I would like to compare data sets to see whether the medians from the different brands of mouthwash I investigated were significantly different from one another as I have unmatched data and this would help me to demonstrate their differences clearly. Effect of Mouthwash on E-Coli Bacteria Results For E-Coli Result No. Mouthwash A (mm) Mouthwash B (mm) Mouthwash C (mm) Mouthwash D (mm) 1 2.14 4.65 6.22 1.81 2 1.88 3.86 5.34 1.98 3 2.46 4.39 4.82 2.12 4 2.79 4.29 6.10 1.88 5 2.74 3.35 4.98 2.06 6 2.54 3.23 5.40 1.91 7 2.81 4.12 5.83 2.43 8 1.95 3.54 5.17 1.78 9 2.65 4.16 5.51 1.65 10 2.27 3.48 5.65 1.54 Average 2.423 3.907 5.502 1.916 Average Results Mouthwash A B C D Median (mm) 2.423 3.907 5.502 1.916 Ranking the Data 1) Mouthwash C 2) Mouthwash B 3) Mouthwash A 4) Mouthwash D ? R1 (Mouthwash C) = 55.02 ? R2 (Mouthwash B) = 39.07 ? R3 (Mouthwash A) = 24.23 ? R4 (Mouthwash D) = 19.16 Comparison of Mouthwash A against B: U1 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) ...read more.

Middle

- 39.07 = 115.93 U2 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 19.16 = 135.84 Smaller Value = 115.93 Critical Value for U = 23 115.93 > 23 Comparison of Mouthwash C against D: U1 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 55.02 = 99.98 U2 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 19.16 = 135.84 Smaller Value = 99.98 Critical Value for U = 23 99.98 > 23 Effect of Mouthwash on Microccus Liteus Bacteria Result No. Mouthwash A (mm) Mouthwash B (mm) Mouthwash C (mm) Mouthwash D (mm) 1 7.30 5.04 7.86 4.21 2 7.81 6.49 7.73 4.50 3 8.45 6.98 7.62 3.38 4 8.72 5.79 7.36 3.47 5 8.64 6.24 6.89 4.95 6 7.94 5.72 6.56 4.13 7 8.58 5.37 7.34 3.91 8 8.63 5.21 6.71 3.86 9 8.36 6.13 7.25 3.22 10 7.79 5.67 7.17 3.34 Average 8.222 5.864 7.252 3.897 Order of Zone of Clearance of Microbial Decay (Highest to Lowest) ...read more.

Conclusion

+ (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 39.07 = 115.93 U2 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 55.02 = 99.98 Smaller Value = 99.98 Critical Value for U = 23 99.98 > 23 Comparison of Mouthwash B against D: U1 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 39.07 = 115.93 U2 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 19.16 = 135.84 Smaller Value = 115.93 Critical Value for U = 23 115.93 > 23 Comparison of Mouthwash C against D: U1 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 55.02 = 99.98 U2 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 19.16 = 135.84 Smaller Value = 99.98 Critical Value for U = 23 99.98 > 23 From the data collected from my statistical test I can see that ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Molecules & Cells section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay


Statistical test only** A worked example of the Mann-Whitney U test that has been calculated well but has not been interpreted at all by the candidate.
The statistic has been used correctly and calculated using the formulae for large sample size. A faster method is available for the small sample size used.
To improve- The real point of carrying out statistical tests is to see if there is true significance in the data collected and then interpret and evaluate the experiment accordingly. This candidate has unfortunately not discussed the meaning of the statistic at all.
If the U value is equal to or less than that in the U value table the null hypothesis can be rejected. The difference in these samples is significant at the 2% level.

Marked by teacher Stevie Fleming 26/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Molecules & Cells essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    An investigation into the inhibiting effect of tomato juice on the germination of cress ...

    3 star(s)

    So the tomato plants with the inhibitors will grow more and produce more offspring. Over a long period of time only those tomato plants with the inhibitors will survive to pass on their genes (the tomato plants with the variations are able to gain light, heat, etc, more easily; they are biologically fit.

  2. Planning an experiment into the effect of mouthwash on bacteria

    The enzymic reaction is reduced because while the inhibitor is in the active site, no substrate can enter. Substrate molecules compete for the active site so the rate of reaction decreases as the higher the proportion of competitive inhibitor the slower the rate of reaction.

  1. Investigation of the effect of adding different concentrations of NaCl to an enzyme-substrate (amylase-starch) ...

    over an appropriate range to allow a conclusive analysis of the readings. The amended plan, which has been drawn up taking into account the newly highlighted problems with the old method, is shown in the below section. Amended Method 1.

  2. An experiment to find of the isotonic point of root vegetables cells in contents ...

    cylinder placed in the 0.2M sucrose solution to have a greater proportional increase in mass, width and length. The potato cylinders placed in the sucrose solution within the range of 0.3-0.4 should also have had an increase in mass, width and length, but this was not the case `as the

  1. The effect of different temperatures on the movement of maggots.

    Statistics Temp (�c) Rank Time (s) Rank Difference in Rank Difference squared 0 2 211 15 -13 169 0 2 193 14 -12 144 0 2 174 13 -11 121 10 5 75 12 -7 49 10 5 70 11 -6 36 10 5 48 8 -3 9 20 8

  2. Type - 1 Hypersensitivity Reaction

    When 0.2 10-4 M of mepyramine was added followed by 0.4 ml of 10-4 histamine a contractile response was not noted and this was recorded. When 0.4 ml of 10-4 carbachol was added a contractile response was noted and recorded.

  1. The investigation to find the effect of glucose concentration on fermentation of yeast.

    Yeast will not work very efficiently at the room temperature, so if we do this experiment at the room temperature, that might took very long time, so we put the boiling tubes into warm water (40?), too let the yeast work more efficiently.

  2. Investigating the effect of temperature on the activity of free and immobilised enzymes.

    to using room temperature milk when it was added to the higher temperatures it cooled them down so the experiment did not happen at the correct temperature. To combat this I will also heat up the milk in the water bath so that temperature stays as close to the chosen temperature as possible.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work