• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Effect of Mouthwash on E-Coli Bacteria

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Interpreting and Evaluating Mann-Whitney U test I have decided that I would like to use the Mann-Whitney U test to interpret and evaluate my data. This is because I would like to compare data sets to see whether the medians from the different brands of mouthwash I investigated were significantly different from one another as I have unmatched data and this would help me to demonstrate their differences clearly. Effect of Mouthwash on E-Coli Bacteria Results For E-Coli Result No. Mouthwash A (mm) Mouthwash B (mm) Mouthwash C (mm) Mouthwash D (mm) 1 2.14 4.65 6.22 1.81 2 1.88 3.86 5.34 1.98 3 2.46 4.39 4.82 2.12 4 2.79 4.29 6.10 1.88 5 2.74 3.35 4.98 2.06 6 2.54 3.23 5.40 1.91 7 2.81 4.12 5.83 2.43 8 1.95 3.54 5.17 1.78 9 2.65 4.16 5.51 1.65 10 2.27 3.48 5.65 1.54 Average 2.423 3.907 5.502 1.916 Average Results Mouthwash A B C D Median (mm) 2.423 3.907 5.502 1.916 Ranking the Data 1) Mouthwash C 2) Mouthwash B 3) Mouthwash A 4) Mouthwash D ? R1 (Mouthwash C) = 55.02 ? R2 (Mouthwash B) = 39.07 ? R3 (Mouthwash A) = 24.23 ? R4 (Mouthwash D) = 19.16 Comparison of Mouthwash A against B: U1 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) ...read more.

Middle

- 39.07 = 115.93 U2 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 19.16 = 135.84 Smaller Value = 115.93 Critical Value for U = 23 115.93 > 23 Comparison of Mouthwash C against D: U1 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 55.02 = 99.98 U2 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 19.16 = 135.84 Smaller Value = 99.98 Critical Value for U = 23 99.98 > 23 Effect of Mouthwash on Microccus Liteus Bacteria Result No. Mouthwash A (mm) Mouthwash B (mm) Mouthwash C (mm) Mouthwash D (mm) 1 7.30 5.04 7.86 4.21 2 7.81 6.49 7.73 4.50 3 8.45 6.98 7.62 3.38 4 8.72 5.79 7.36 3.47 5 8.64 6.24 6.89 4.95 6 7.94 5.72 6.56 4.13 7 8.58 5.37 7.34 3.91 8 8.63 5.21 6.71 3.86 9 8.36 6.13 7.25 3.22 10 7.79 5.67 7.17 3.34 Average 8.222 5.864 7.252 3.897 Order of Zone of Clearance of Microbial Decay (Highest to Lowest) ...read more.

Conclusion

+ (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 39.07 = 115.93 U2 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 55.02 = 99.98 Smaller Value = 99.98 Critical Value for U = 23 99.98 > 23 Comparison of Mouthwash B against D: U1 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 39.07 = 115.93 U2 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 19.16 = 135.84 Smaller Value = 115.93 Critical Value for U = 23 115.93 > 23 Comparison of Mouthwash C against D: U1 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 55.02 = 99.98 U2 = ( n x n ) + (0.5n ) (n + 1) - ? R U1 = (10 x 10) + (0.5[10]) (10 + 1) - 19.16 = 135.84 Smaller Value = 99.98 Critical Value for U = 23 99.98 > 23 From the data collected from my statistical test I can see that ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Molecules & Cells section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay


Statistical test only** A worked example of the Mann-Whitney U test that has been calculated well but has not been interpreted at all by the candidate.
The statistic has been used correctly and calculated using the formulae for large sample size. A faster method is available for the small sample size used.
To improve- The real point of carrying out statistical tests is to see if there is true significance in the data collected and then interpret and evaluate the experiment accordingly. This candidate has unfortunately not discussed the meaning of the statistic at all.
If the U value is equal to or less than that in the U value table the null hypothesis can be rejected. The difference in these samples is significant at the 2% level.

Marked by teacher Stevie Fleming 26/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Molecules & Cells essays

  1. Planning an experiment into the effect of mouthwash on bacteria

    The enzymic reaction is reduced because while the inhibitor is in the active site, no substrate can enter. Substrate molecules compete for the active site so the rate of reaction decreases as the higher the proportion of competitive inhibitor the slower the rate of reaction.

  2. To find out how different concentrations of sucrose solution affect the incipient plasmolysis of ...

    To increase the precision of my results I will use more expensive, accurate reliable equipment which have a lower percentage error then pipettes. Another major limitation occurred when you dried the root vegetable cylinder to remove the water off the vegetable cylinder which can lead to inaccuracies caused by different

  1. Type - 1 Hypersensitivity Reaction

    specific IgE, also the IgE must initially be bound onto the mast cells surface receptors to stimulate a reaction, since, only previous contact with the egg albumin (antigen/allergen), would induce the synthesis of IgE and the contractile response in tissue was elicited by an immune response via the immune system.

  2. The effect of different temperatures on the movement of maggots.

    15cm along a glass tube got shorter; therefore the maggots moved faster. The statistical test shows that the results have less than a five percent chance of being due to chance and not to a scientific factor, however it does not confirm that the hypothesis given was the reason for

  1. The Effect Of Copper Sulphate On Pepsin Activity.

    second series of pilot studys was to see whether my chosen concentrations of copper sulphate were suitable for my investigation. I did this by testing my highest and lowest concentrations: Table 3: Summary of full pilot study results Concentration of copper sulphate (%)

  2. Investigating the effect of temperature on the activity of free and immobilised enzymes.

    This difference is not significant enough to conclude that there is a difference due to errors in the experiment. Therefore, I can't draw definite conclusions from this single experiment, as there was a large percentage procedural error. I can conclude from my results that the enzyme activity or the rate

  1. An experiment to find of the isotonic point of root vegetables cells in contents ...

    Also after tasting each root vegetable I believe that their may be a wider gap for each isotonic point than my preliminary results show. I say this because after tasting each root vegetable, although the sweetness matches the order which I stated for my isotonic point the sweetness of each

  2. Investigation of the effect of adding different concentrations of NaCl to an enzyme-substrate (amylase-starch) ...

    The tertiary structure is important to enzymes, as the maintenance of the shape of the active site within an enzyme is vital for its activity. Enzymes are not destroyed or used up by the reactions they catalyse and there presence does not alter the end products, however, they do wear out and have to be constantly replaced.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work