• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Experiment test for F = m2L by whirling a rubber bung (centripetal force)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Physics Laboratory Report

Title:Experiment test for F = mω2L by whirling a rubber bung (centripetal force)

Aim:                1.        To help us to study uniform circular motion, and

  1. Prove that centripetal force required for keeping circular motion

= mω2r

where        m =        mass of the object performing circular motion

ω =        average angular velocity of the object

r =        radius of the circular orbit

Principle:        When the rubber bung was being whirled in a circle, it was performing circular motion. When a body performs circular motion, it requires a net force towards the center to give the centripetal acceleration that causes the change of direction of the body.

This net force towards the center is called centripetal force. The centripetal force acting on the rubber bung was provided by the tension of the nylon string. The nylon string was attached to a number of screw nuts of known mass.

Forces acting on the rubber bung: (negligible air resistance)

  1. Tension of the nylon string
  2. Weight of the rubber bung

∵        Tension was constant though the nylon string (Assume there was no friction between the nylon string and the glass tube)

                ∴        Tension of string = weight of the screw nuts

                The tension in the nylon string can be vary by change the number of screw nuts in the system.

...read more.

Middle

Readings:

Mass of rubber bung m         = 0.03 kg

Mass of screw nuts M         = 0.104 kg

Tension in string T         = Mg

= 0.104 × 9.8 N

= 1.0192 N

Results of using different lengths (L) of nylon string in the experiment.

Length of string L (m)

0.4

0.5

0.6

Time for 50 revolutions (s)

37.22

39.52

40.23

Angular velocity

ω = 2π / T (radian s-1)

8.4406

7.9494

7.8091

2L (N)

0.8549

0.9479

1.0977

Errors & Accuracy:

Mean mω2L         = (0.8549 + 0.9479 + 1.0977) / 3

                          = 0.9668 N

Percentage of accuracy         =|T – mean value of mω2L|/ T × 100%

                                        =|1.0192 – 0.9668|/ 1.0192 × 100%

                                        = 0.0524 / 1.0192 × 100%

                                        = 5.14%

  1. Conclusion:

The value of tension calculates from my experiment result and the value of tension in the nylon string are very close together. It is a reasonable value. It implied that the frictional force and human error were not too large.

  1. Assumption:
  1. The frictional force was neglected.
  2. The mass of the nylon string was neglected.
  3. The nylon string was assumed to be inextensible.
  4. The orbit was assumed to be exactly horizontal circular motion.
  5. The angular velocity of the rubber bung was assumed to be constant.
  1. Precautions:
  1. This experiment requires 2 students to do. Otherwise, if we use one hand to hold the glass tube and whirl the rubber bung, the other hand use the stopwatch. It was very difficult to hold the glass tube stably, count the number of revolution accurately and press the stopwatch immediately after the rubber bung complete 50 circles.
  2. During the experiment, the nylon string
...read more.

Conclusion

 the angular velocity of the rubber bung.The rubber bung was whirled at a very high angular velocity. It was very difficult to count the number of revolution. Therefore, the rubber bung may not be whirled for exactly 50 revolutions.L, M and m may not be measured very accurately.The zero error of the metre rule.Random error.The reaction time of press the stopwatch.
  1. Possible Improvement:
  1. Use a nylon string that the force constant is much larger.
  2. Whirl the rubber bung at a constant angular velocity so that the centripetal force requires for do the circular motion is constant.
  3. Do the experiment carefully and ask a partner to see whether the rubber bung is doing a circular motion.
  4. Provide a constant force to the system to overcome the frictional force and catch the glass tube stably.
  5. Use a glass rod that has a smooth edge and a rubber bung that has a streamline shape.
  6. Use a larger L to do the experiment.

∵ L↑ → ω↓

If the angular velocity was decreased, it would be much easier to see the rubber bung and easier to count the number of revolution.

  1. Measure those values many times and take the mean of all results.
  2. Use a new metre rule.
  3. Do the experiment many times to reduce the random error.
  4. Raise the number of revolution from 50 to 100 to reduce the percentage error of using the stopwatch.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Fields & Forces section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Fields & Forces essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Investigating the forces acting on a trolley on a ramp

    5 star(s)

    Thus, because in this experiment u was 0, the resulting rearranged formula was; a = v2 / 2s Hence, it was possible to find the acceleration along the slope by taking the gradient of the resulting regression lines plotted through the data.

  2. What are the physical quantities that affect the value of centripetal force when a ...

    The centripetal force apparatus are constructed as shown above. 3. A length of 1m of the nylon string is measured from the rubber bund to the glass tube. 4. The length L of the string is marked with the paper marker.

  1. Centripetal Force Experiment. Measure the centripetal force and compare it with the theorectical value ...

    and mass of bung/weights (due to wind). Systematic errors include measuring mass of bung/weights (due to inacurracy of balance). Limitation of Appartus 1. There is friction between glass tube and the string. 2. The string is extensible. 3. Air resistance cannot be avoided Suggestions for Improvements 1.

  2. A1 Force of friction(TG)

    The force of static friction equals the applied force as the block remains static. When the applied force exceeds the force of kinetic friction, the block starts to move. In general, the force of kinetic friction stays constant as the block continues to move along on the bench.

  1. Centripetal motion experiment. Objective To study the relationship between the angular speed and ...

    However, those in table 1 are not the same because of the experimental error. For example, the fan maybe turning on when performing the experiment. There is friction acting on the opening of the glass tube. And the rubber bung cannot be exactly whirled in constant speed and horizomtal plane.

  2. Force of friction

    The data in steps 10-12 was tabulated. Assumption: 1. The spring balance was kept in horizontal position.

  1. Lab Report - In this lab report, it will describe the weight of the ...

    Repeat the procedure with a third bob attached at the end of the string Control Variable: Number of bobs Results: The first bob weighs 14.42 � 0.05 grams attached to a 55 � 0.05 cm, string releasing the bob at 70� � 0.5 having an average time of 2.76 � 0.01 seconds.

  2. Design and conduct an experiment that graphically determines whether drag force is proportional to ...

    4. When you found the position, record it in your data booklet. 5. Repeat steps 3-4 two more times. (3 trials in total) Part 3: 1. Repeat part two but replace two coffee cup filters with three coffee cup filters.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work