• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Find the Ar of lithium.

Extracts from this document...


Evaluation. Was my experiment suitable? My experiments enabled me to gain results, which then with the aid of calculations I could find the Ar of lithium. From this perspective you can say the experiment was suitable as I achieved this. Were my results what I expected? Looking at the results they do not match the expected Ar of lithium (6.9). Method 1, measuring the volume of hydrogen produced, gave the result of 19.76 (a factor of 12.86 out). Method 2, titrating the lithium hydroxide produced, gave the result of 8.65 (a factor of 1.75 out). So looking at these results not only we can see they are out, but one method is more inaccurate than the other. The titration is far more accurate than the collecting of gas. Comparing both methods, and recognising sources of error. Method1. Sources of error in the collection of gas practical were: When the lithium was weighed I had to place it on filter paper first to remove the oil from it. ...read more.


Also 250 ml measuring cylinders are only accurate to 2 ml -anything under this had to be estimated, which by its very nature lacks accuracy. Parallax may have been a problem when gauging the volume in the 250ml measuring cylinder (it has a relatively large cross-sectional area compared to a burette). This allows for a greater % inaccuracy if you do not line your eye up correctly with the meniscus. Method2. Sources of error in the titration of lithium hydroxide were: because the Li was not weighed accurately (see above) this would of affected my calculations at the end. Air bubbles in the burette will have affected the titre as will have parallax -this may have been a problem when gauging the volume in the burette (however it has a relatively small cross-sectional area compared to a 250ml measuring cylinder- so is more accurate). But if you do not line your eye up correctly with the meniscus there could be a % inaccuracy. ...read more.


etc. Ways to minimise errors, and practical adaptations to improve my experiment. * Reliability could easily be improved for method 1 by performing more repeats (I only did this experiment once!). I feel method 2 was fairly reliable but again it could be argued that repeats could improve this further. * On method one if you tilt the flask at and angle and place the Li inside so it is not touching the water, and then place the bung and level the tube upwards, the chemicals should mix without gas loss. * Also making sure the Li was as pure as possible before weighing to eliminate all oil possible. * Make sure eye is lined with the meniscus and use the smallest instrument possible (with the smallest cross-sectional area possible) to eliminate parallax. * Use instruments with the finest possible gradations to measure volume. * Remove the funnel whilst performing the titration. This will prevent extra acid from being added during the titration * Use the same batch of acid. Then the concentrations will be the same. * Air bubbles in the burette removed be titrating. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Physical Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Physical Chemistry essays

  1. Acid-Base Titrations.

    To select a proper indicator, then, requires determination of the pH of the solution at the equivalence point of the titration and selection of an indicator whose pKa is as close to that pH as possible. Indicators are usually organic structures of some complexity or natural products and, like dyeing

  2. Investigating the Rate of the Reaction between Bromide and Bromate Ions in Acid Solution

    Where and . Therefore the gradient of the line is -6.442.9. By the Arrhenius equation, the activation enthalpy of a reaction is given by , where m is the gradient and R is the molar gas constant, equal to 8.31.Therefore the activation enthalpy of the reaction between bromide ions and bromate ions in acid solution is equal to .

  1. Determination of the relative atomic mass of Lithium

    I can therefore ignore this anomaly as it would make my results unreliable and take an average from my other results. Average volume of hydrogen = 138 + 139 + 138 � 3 = 138.33 to 2 d.p. and 138 to the nearest whole.

  2. Determining the Relative Atomic Mass of Lithium

    Once the reaction is finished I took the reading from the measuring cylinder of the volume of hydrogen produced. Method 1 Results mass Volume of H2 produced 0.10g 176cm3 Apparatus � clamp � Beaker � Phenolethein Indicator � Pippete � LiOH (from experiment 1)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work