• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Find the separation between two cones of the same type on the fovea of the eye by using the resolving power of the eye.

Extracts from this document...


Resolving Power Of the Eye

Objective: Find the separation between two cones of the same type on the fovea of the eye by using the resolving power of the eye.

Introduction: The retina contains two types of light detecting cells: rods and cones. Cones provide the eye’s colour sensitivity, rods, though more sensitive than cones do not detect colour. There is an area on the retina with a much higher density of cones called the fovea. When an object is observed its image is focused on the fovea. The fovea is a 0.3mm diameter area containing on rods and very thin densely packed cones. Cones can be divided into three types; one type detects each of red, green and blue light. The green and red cones are concentrated in the fovea centralis.

To measure the separation between two cones in the eye we can use the resolving power of the eye, for two objects to be resolved optically the viewer must be able to clearly differentiate two distinct bodies. (Rayleigh’s criterion:θ = λ/d)

Critical case shown where objects are just resolved

For two light sources of the same wavelength to be resolved the light must stimulate two cones on either side of one unstimulated cone.

Resolving power due to a circular aperture can be calculated by:

θ = 1.22λ


Where:            θ = resolving power of optical instrument

λ = Wavelength of light

...read more.


The diameter of the pupil must be kept constant and as large as possible to allow as much light into the eye as possible. This will be kept constant as a direct result of controlling the brightness of the environment. (Variation of 1mm to 10mm possible.)

Method: Set up the apparatus as shown in the previous diagram, switch on the power pack at 3.00v. Turn off the lights in the room and block out daylight coming from any windows or doors. Allow 2 minutes for the eyes to adjust to this darkness and do not allow any light into the room from this point up until the end of the procedure. The viewer of the lights must then stand on the masking tape and back away from the light sources following the masking tape using a metre ruler as a guide to the height of their eyes. The viewer must back away until they are at the point where they can just resolve the two light sources. This point must then be marked on the masking tape using the metre ruler as a guide. Repeat the experiment for this separation three times to obtain a reliable result and eliminate any anomalous results. Three is enough results to obtain a good average result as long as all the results are relatively close together.

Remove the acrylic and replace with another piece of acrylic with holes of different separations and repeat the above procedure. 5 different separations must be used as six results are sufficient to plot a straight-line graph and the sixth result can be 0,0. Less results than this may not produce an accurate gradient and more results would be surplus to requirements. When the experiment is completed measure the marks recorded on the tape for distances and then calculate an average distance for each separation. Plot a line graph of separation against average distance. The graph is plotted to produce a gradient to obtain a value for the resolving power of the eye the graph will reduce any overall errors in the experiment.

Separation of apertures is to be measured with a travelling microscope accurate to ±0.005mm, this measuring equipment is to be used as it is the most accurate available to me in the lab and so will reduce the errors in my results by as much as possible. The other measurement to be taken is the distance from the objects from whence they can be resolved. This is to be measured using a measuring tape accurate to ±0.5cm this is sufficiently accurate as it is a very small error compared to the overall distance and so will not detract significantly from the accuracy of my results.

When the results have been taken the calculation shown overleaf will be used to calculate the separation of two cones on the fovea.

Safety: Electrical equipment must be used with care and it must be ensured that no water is brought into contact with it.

Care must be taken whilst carrying out a procedure in a darkened room, ensure all sharp corners and protruding objects are cleared.


Equation 1: θ = s


θ = resolving power of the eye in radians

        s = separation of apertures

        r = Distance away from light sources when resolving is just possible

Equation 2: s’ = r’θ

        s’ = separation of 3 cones

        r’ = radius of the eye

θ = resolving power in radians

Separation between two cones = s’


Theoretical θ = 1.22λ


λ = wavelength of light

        D = Diameter of pupil


  • Assume pupil size is constant
  • Assume diameter of the eye is 26mm
  • Assume no aberrations of the eye
  • Assume room is pitch black
  • Assume L.E.D.s are of constant brightness
  • Assume apertures are spherical
...read more.


I will test the accuracy of my results by carrying out the experiment in a bright room, resolving two black objects of a similar size to the apertures used in my procedure. Resolving power in this situation should be less than resolving power calculated in the results.


θ = s  = gradient = 3.125×10-4


Separation of cones = r ×θ

r = 1.3×10-2

= 4.062×10-6m = separation between 3 cones


                        = 2.03×10-6m = separation between 2 cones


This value is appropriate but it must be taken into account that the following errors will affect the final value:


Tape measure accurate to ± 0.01m                                0.05× 100 = 3.13%

Use of tape measure accurate to ± 0.05m                         1.60

Travelling  microscope accurate to ± 0.01×10-3m                0.01×10-3m × 100 = 2.27%

Use of travelling microscope: error as above.                0.44×10-3m

Other errors

Assumption that the eye is 1.3 ×10-2 radius is a statistical average value and so may vary considerably.

Refracted angle is negligible is an assumption which will affect the accuracy of the results as using this assumption we can use similar triangles to calculate the separation of two cones.

Given these errors be taken into account my value is close enough to the literature value for the separation of two cones to confirm that my procedure was valid.


  1. World book 2001. Chicago: World Book Inc, 2001: page 460.
  1. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/vision/rodcone.html
  1. Advanced physics for you: Keith Johnson, Simmone Hewett, Sue Holt, John Miller, Nelson Thornes ltd. 2000

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses essays

  1. In this experiment I will be investigating the efficiency of a motor. I hope ...

    The voltmeter and ammeter persistently changed value in the experiment; therefore we can tell that maybe some resistance was carried in the connecting leads. If I was to test again, I would change the timing technique by using a light gate instrument.

  2. Lenses experiment

    Ray Diagram 3 shows the object between the F (focal point) and 2F (double the focal length). This gives a real, magnified and inverted image this is smaller that the previous one but one could easily measure it. Ray Diagram 4 shows the object on 2F this then gives a real, same size and inverted image.

  1. My experiments focus is to obtain an accurate measurement for a specific lenss power.

    This turned out to be a very small percentage uncertainty in the U values ((0.5mm/200mm) x 100) gave the highest value of 0.25%. Such a small percentage is negligible and hence I have ignored uncertainties in U in my calculations.

  2. aspects of physics

    on a sunny day the doors would be open all of the time. The infrared radiation goes through a window which is located on the housing of the P.I.R. The window is made so that it allows infrared rays to pass through but then doesn't allow visible light through.

  1. This essay is on vision, its malfunctions & diagnostics methods.

    Subjective methods include the Snellen Chart Test, in which the optotype is placed twenty feet (6 meters) away from the subject. Some individuals may well wear spectacles in which case the examination is performed with the subject wearing them. The eye which is adversely impaired out of the two is examined first.

  2. The eye.

    longer focal length) EYE DEFECTS 1) Myopia (short sight) Nearsightedness. If the eyeball is too long or the lens too spherical, the image of distant objects is brought to a focus in front of the retina and is out of focus again before the light strikes the retina.

  1. When two objects are placed close enough to each other or are a great ...

    As a result, my hypothesis was proven correct. Text Questions 1. The limit of resolution of my eyes from a one foot distance when using two human hairs was observed to be 0.5 mm and the limit of resolution of my partner's eyes from a one foot distance when using two human hairs was observed to be 0.4mm.

  2. Lenses - experiment plan

    This will be done by sating up a ray box with a convex/concave lens and shining a ray beams through the lenses and drawing over the beams. With this experiment I hope to acquire the skill of measuring focal points and I will hopefully be able to use this skill later on in higher levels science.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work