• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Force of Friction experiment

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

AL Physics TAS 4 (A1) – FULL REPORTimage00.png

Force of Friction

(2008/12/17)

1. Objective

  1. To study the effects of the normal reaction and surface area on the force of friction using a block.
  2. To estimate and compare the coefficients of static and kinetic friction of different materials.

2. Apparatus

  • Wooden block (190.0 g) × 3
  • Elastic strings
  • Wooden plank × 1
  • Spring balance × 1
  • Plastic plate × 1
  • Balance × 1
  • Brick × 1

3. Theory

Limiting static friction image06.pngimage01.png

Friction always opposes motion. It increases with the applied force. However, it cannot increase indefinitely.

When a body is in contact with a rough surface, friction arises at the contact surface if the body is subjected to an applied force. When the applied force exceeds the limiting static friction image06.png, the body will start to slip over the rough surface. And the value of image06.png is roughly proportional to the normal reaction R.

image13.png where image10.pngis the coefficient of static friction at the contact surface.


Kinetic friction image09.png

Generally, the friction acting on a resting block is less than image06.pnguntil the block starts to move. Once the body starts to move over the rough surface, the friction would decrease slightly to a value known as kinetic friction image09.png. So image09.png is slightly less than image06.png but it is still approximately proportional to R.

image07.png where image08.pngis the coefficient of kinetic friction at the contact surface.image02.png

image09.png remains constant even the applied force is increased further.

image08.pngis slightly less than image10.png.

3. Procedure

A.

...read more.

Middle

Block sliding:

1

2

3

4

5

Reading / N

0.4

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.4

Therefore, for a wooden block on a wooden plank, the limiting static friction image06.png is 1.1 N.

image12.png

B.        Coefficients of friction for various materials

Wood on wooden plank:

Number of blocks

1

2

3

image06.png/ N

1.1

2.0

3.2

image09.png/ N

0.4

1.1

1.5

R / N

1.86

3.73

5.59

image03.png

Wood on plastic plate:

Number of blocks

1

2

3

image06.png/ N

0.9

1.6

2.3

image09.png/ N

0.3

0.8

1.1

R / N

1.86

3.73

5.59

image04.png

Wood on brick:

Number of blocks

1

2

3

image06.png/ N

2.2

4.6

6.5

image09.png/ N

1.2

2.2

3.4

R / N

1.86

3.73

5.59

image05.png

The coeffiient of friction of the wooden blocks on various materials are summarized as follow:

wooden plank

plastic plate

brick

image10.png

0.57

0.43

1.2*

image08.png

0.27

0.21

0.6

* It is abnormal for the coefficient greater than 1. Refer to the Discussion on page 7.

C.

...read more.

Conclusion

Also, we can ensure the applied force is horizontal by fixing the spring balance on a horizontal platform. If we pull the spring balance directly, the force may not be always horizontal and the useful horizontal component of the force will be smaller than the balance’s reading.

When pulling the plank, the spring balance’s reading represents the frictional force. When pulling the blocks directly, the reading represents the applied force, which may not be equal (in magnitude) to the friction.

Q.17        In pushing a car (with the engine detached from the wheels), explain briefly why it is more difficult to start the motion, but once the car is moving, it is relatively easier to maintain its motion.

A.17        Limiting static friction is greater than kinetic friction. Especially for a car with mass generally over 1000 kg, the reaction force is very large. So the difference of magnitude between these two types of friction is very significant for a human.

Q.18        In the design of the braking system in bicycles, what parameter(s) should be maximized to achieve a larger frictional force?

A.18        The reaction force exerted on the braking pads and the coefficient of kinetic friction should be maximized.

8. Conclusion

This experiment was quite successful. It demonstrated that friction is directly proportional to normal reaction but independent of contacting area. Also, coefficients of static and kinetic friction can be compared.

~ End ~

P.

AL-PHY-TAS 4 (A1) - Full Report

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Mechanics & Radioactivity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Mechanics & Radioactivity essays

  1. Investigating Force, Mass and Acceleration using a Trolley

    The track might be slightly incline due to the table or the floor which the track is not perpendicular to the gravitational force of earth and create an unwanted force in the system. For example The unwanted force ((MA + M)g Sin a)

  2. Objectives: To determine the center of gravity of a body of irregular shapes

    Hence we can find out the gravitation acceleration. Procedures 1. The clamp was fixed on the stand. 2. The optical pin with cork was fixed on the middle point of the stand by using plasticine. 3. The stand is fixed on the table firmly by using the G-clamp 4.

  1. Centripetal force

    Fifthly, there is an error on our reaction time to start and stop the timer. Although we take the time of 50 revolutions, the reaction time of humans directly affect the experimental results. Sixthly, the experiment involves measurement error. The apparatus for measurement is not enough, for example, the metre

  2. Perform an experiment on friction and the variables of friction using a wooden block, ...

    When the experiment was carried out, as I predicted, when the weight on the block increased so therefore did the Newton's required to move it from a fixed position. The test was done with 2 Newton meters over 2 days. Using the same Newton meter was impossible as it broke.

  1. In this report I will start by exploring the history of the Computerised Tomography ...

    Note, the gantry cannot rotate any further otherwise the high voltage cables would get intertwined and damaged; causing a hazard. Pre-1987 the gantry would spin 360� in one direction, take a slice and then spin 360� in the other direction and take a second slice.

  2. Use of technology in a hospital radiology department. The department of imaging is one ...

    If the cleaners do not clean the ward and the department it result bacteria and other diseases to the whole hospital could finally cause big health problem. Maintenances staffs, these people are responsible for all the equipment used in the department, ensuring all equipment is safe before they operate to the patient along with radiographer.

  1. Centripetal motion. The objective of this experiment is to verify whether the tension ...

    He should have the feeling that only adding very little force is needed to keep the rubber bung in motion, or otherwise the rubber bung is actually not in a constant angular speed. Data and data analysis: Mass of the rubber bung (m)

  2. Multi-bladed Pumps. Does the number of propellor blades affect the efficiency of a ...

    = Puseful out / Pin. Also, power input is proportional to input voltage since current is constant at 5 A in my equipment. P = VI and I = 5 � Power (Watts) = 5 x voltage (Volts). Review of purpose of investigation The focus of this investigation is to determine the optimum number of blades for a propeller to have to maximise energy-efficiency.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work