• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17

How Does The Oxygenation Level Of The Water Affect The Number Of Stonefly Larvae?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Contents Page: 1. Title Page 2. Contents Page 3. Abstract, Hypothesis, Research 4. Research 5. Research, Rational 6. Initial Planning 7. Preliminary Results 8. Revised Plan 9. Observations and Recording 10. Results Table 11. Results Graph 12. Statistical Test 13. Data Analysis, Evaluation 14. Evaluation 15. References Abstract This research project was designed to investigate the affects of oxygenation levels the number of stonefly larvae in fast flowing rivers and streams. Stonefly larvae are an invertebrate that makes its home in fast flowing streams and rivers all over the world. Sampling different places in a stream or river and counting the number of stonefly larvae in that area carried out the test. Experimental Hypothesis I expect there to be more stonefly larvae in water with a high concentration of oxygen compared with water of a lower concentration of oxygen. Null Hypothesis There will be no difference between the amount of stonefly larvae in water with a high concentration of oxygen compared with water of a lower concentration of oxygen. Research This experiment was designed to research how oxygenation levels in water affect invertebrates that live in it, especially stonefly larvae. There are many different factors which help or hinder life for aquatic animals. I will be conducting my experiment in fast flowing streams and rivers. The main factors that affect aquatic life are things like; temperature of the water, velocity of the water the substrate and the oxygenation levels of the water. The substrate of the river is what kind of terrain there is at the bottom of it, for example large rocks or small rocks. I have researched these factors as they will help me determine the variables in my experiment. Oxygenation levels of water are very important for the aquatic life within. Water becomes oxygenated in three main ways; the oxygen dissolves by diffusion from the surrounding air, aeration of water that has tumbled over falls and rapids and as a waste product of photosynthesis: (Carbon dioxide + Water ---> Oxygen + Carbon-rich foods). ...read more.

Middle

wild animals could cause an infection or disease Wear gloves when suitable and wash hands after handling animals Some plants or animals in and around the stream could be poisonous or give a nasty bite/sting Avoid plants and animals that you can not identify and stay away from the ones you do unless you know they are safe Revised plan I have arranged my preliminary results into scatter graphs to get a better view of how the different variables affect the dependant variable. Depth does not seem to have much of an affect on the number of stonefly at a site, there is no correlation in the scatter graph and the results are spread out so not very precise. This means I will need to control depth but not as carefully as other variables. Temperature does not seem to have much of an effect on the number of stonefly either, but I think this is because the temperature does not change much over the different sites I took samples from. This means I will need to control the temperature but not as much as other variables. Velocity of the water against number of stonefly larvae seems to have a positive correlation but not a very precise scatter. This means that velocity can affect the number of stonefly larvae at a site so I will need to control this variable as much as I can. I have decided to make many changes to my initial method of research. I have decided not to measure the depth or temperature of the water, as there is not a large enough range to affect my dependent variable. I will be controlling depth by only choosing places that are around the same depth but I will only measure this using my eyes. I have decided this because of the data I have gathered in my preliminary data. The temperature of the river I am taking my measurements in hardly changes and does not affect my dependent variable in my preliminary data. ...read more.

Conclusion

This means that stonefly are not directly affected by the speed of the water around them. Evaluation There where allot of variables I could not control because my research was carried out in a natural and unpredictable environment. The main limitations to my data was that I could not control the substrate of the site in the river where I took my sample, the rocks I tested on could have been slightly smaller or larger and there could have been a different amount each time. This could have caused random errors. Another limitation is that when you kicked the substrate 10 times to take a D-net sample you could not be sure to kick with the same strength each time, kicking harder would release more invertebrates from the stones, kicking weaker wouldn?t release as many. This also could have caused random errors. Overall variables where kept as constant as possible and the limitations to my data would not have affected my results too badly as they where small limitations (ignoring the occasional anomalous result). I repeated measurements often so this helped reduce the risk of random error significantly and the large number of samples I took gave enough replicates to support my conclusion. Therefore I believe my experiment was controlled well, the results reliable with a low degree of error and supports my conclusion well. I could improve my experiment by controlling the variables more precisely. I could do this by finding and marking multiple sites with as similar conditions as possible (depth, temperature, velocity) and then taking net samples at a later date. You would have to come back at a later date to take D-net samples as taking the measurements of the variables could disturb the invertebrates leading to unreliable results. You would need to conduct the research over a larger stretch of river to get enough data and mark the sites you would use in a way that would not have an affect on invertebrates in the area. This was not possible during my research, as I did not have the time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Nature vs. Nurture - And its affect on intelligence, personality, and behavior

    4 star(s)

    Heredity (nature) affects how personality and behavior change both directly and indirectly. In some cases, personality is the medium through which genes affect behavior, while in other situations it is behavior that is the medium through which genes affect personality.

  2. Peer reviewed

    An Investigation into the effect of caffeine on reaction times

    5 star(s)

    Controlled variables Factor How I will prevent it How it would affect my results How the error would be visible in my results What kind of error Improving at the games I have decided that I cannot prevent this factor within the time that I have The results would improve

  1. Peer reviewed

    Is there a relationship between the girth of a tree trunk and the percentage ...

    4 star(s)

    Use a compass to identify the aspects of the trunk. Then mark each aspect one the rope, which has previously been tied around the trunk. Also, measure the light intensity using a light meter at the north mark, ensuring that the light meter is facing away, perpendicular, from the tree trunk.

  2. Investigate how the height to width ratio of Limpets varies with distance from sea

    and include a greater range of height and width dimensions, rather than using limpets of the same size. Limpet distribution is aggregated; therefore recording one sample will be unreliable. Consequently I will repeat the above method 3 times, in order to gain an appropriate number of results to draw a conclusion from and prove my hypothesis to be correct.

  1. Edexcel Level 3 Extended Project - Should Embyonic Stem Cell Research be applied to ...

    For some people, this classes as murder, which in modern society is deemed unacceptable and also illegal. MEDICAL POTENTIAL Moving away from general opinions, laws and other arguments for and against stem cell research, if you take a look at some medical miracles stem cells are already creating the evidence is concrete.

  2. patterns of growth and development

    In this time the following happens at 3 months a baby will stop crying when they hear a rattle, turn their head when they hear a sound. The will suck lips at sounds of feed preparation, and make noises when happy.

  1. Investigating the effect of trampling on salt marsh

    How did I work safely? * The site manager at Freiston shore (Simon) checked the timetables for us and informed us accordingly. He also gave us his phone number in case of an emergency. I worked in a group with five people just in case anything went wrong.

  2. An Investigation into the effect of flow rate on the size of Gammarus pulex

    faster water flow whereas a greater number of juvenile shrimps will be present in areas of slower water flow." Null hypothesis "There is no relationship between flow rate and the size of shrimps." Statistical test The degree of correlation between flow rate and shrimp size will be determined by calculating a Spearman's ranks test.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work