I have selected and prepared this apparatus carefully, making sure that all apparatus I am going to use will be the same by putting my name on all apparatus, as there could be slight difference between pieces of the same type of equipment (especially in the case of solar cells, as each has a different number of scraps).
Preliminary Tests
Experiment to find the maximum output of a solar cell under varying loads
I am going to start this experiment by finding the maximum output of my solar cell under different levels of resistance. The load at which maximum power output is found will be the point at which I will choose to experiment further. I will be changing the load using a variable resistor called a “Decade Resistance Box”; I will move the resistance up Ohm by Ohm until I see a very clear peak in the power. This power is worked out by reading the voltage (V) from the in parallel voltmeter and the current (Ω) from the in series ammeter and multiplying the voltage by the current to find the power. The light source is to be kept 0.043m above the cell; this is measured from the centre of the bulb and the centre of the solar cell.
I found that the 200m setting on the ammeter was of the highest accuracy (meaning it can read current up to 200Ω, 4 significant figures and 1 decimal place). I found that the 2v setting on the voltmeter on the voltmeter was most accurate (meaning it can read voltage up to 2v, 4 significant figures and 3 decimal places.
I have also decided to do this test a minimum of 2 times to ensure accurate result, however if I see any anomalous results I will repeat the test as many times as necessary.
The results for the first attempt of this experiment are as follows;
I drew a graph to illustrate these results;
The results for the second attempt of this experiment are as follows;
I drew a graph to illustrate these results;
Conclusion
The results of this experiment show quite clearly that at approximately 3Ω the solar cells output is at an absolute maximum. If I were to have access to a resistor that stepped up in decimal places I could focus in on all the decimal places between 2 and 4 to find the exact point at which the maximum output is placed. However I do not have access to this equipment, so 3Ω is the closest I can get to the load at which the solar cell functions best at.
The fact that the maximum output is found under a load of 3Ω is due to the way in which voltage and current change and the relationship between each. When I increased the load on the circuit the voltage increased very rapidly at first, however these jumps got smaller as the load was increased, starting as a 0.05v jump at the first, until at the end the jump was so little that it couldn’t be measured as a change at all on a 3 decimal place accurate voltmeter. The current change is also quite uniform, however it started by dropping in very large jumps, at first it was a jump of 38 milliamps, until at the end the jump was a mere 0.8 milliamps. In both voltage and current the jumps changed slightly more each time, this is displayed in the graphs below, to show the relationship.
The power however was less uniform; it started to rise very quickly after the first Ω of load was added on (increased by 1.2w), but after the second Ω was added on it only rose by a very small amount (0.16w), it then reached a peak at 12.88w under 3Ω of resistance and then decreased steadily downwards in power, until the end reading of 4.681w. This is shown in the graph above.
There was a little background light in this experiment; however this was so small that it did not even show up on the voltmeter on any setting and it a current of 0.3 milliamps. The reason for this background light could be that there were other students around me performing the same experiment giving off light contamination and the fact that light was able to get in from outside the classroom, this background light would have obviously varied in intensity during the experiment, as people turn on and off different lamps at different times and the intensity of the sun varies, however the figure for the amount of background light I just stated was that of which I recorded at the beginning of the experiment. This could be the reason for the small ripples in my graph. The temperature was also not at 18°C, it was 20°C at the start of the experiment and this of course could be another reason for the ripples in my graphs, as well as the fact that the temperature is also variable and could of changed at some point in this experiment and caused the ripples, because the variable resistor is only accurate at 18°C, at which point it is accurate to 0.1%.
The above observations and analysis are for test one, however test two was of very close correspondence to the result of test one so I feel no need to go any further than the fact that there is a strong correlation between the two and the finding of test two are the same as the first, with just a slight change in the value of the measurements.
Evaluation
As stated earlier there are a number of ways in which this experiment could have been improved and should be if performed again.
These are as follows;
- A fluorescent light should have been used, as it has a low heat output and would not cause any complications; these complications are explained in detail on page 3, lines 8-15.
- A resistance box that stepped up in decimal Ω’s would have been useful for the reasons stated on page 6, lines 4-8.
- No background light at all for the reasons stated on page 6, line 24 - page 7, line 6.
- A temperature of exactly 18°C throughout for the reasons explained on page 7, lines 6-9.
- Full consideration of my risk assessment, for the reasons described on page 1, line 31 – page 2, line 20.
A perfect experiment would be performed in a totally light tight room, at exactly 18°C, with a fluorescent light, a resistor that steps up in decimal Ω’s and the area would have all of the safety precautions mentioned in my “risk assessment” taken into account.
The following is a diagram of how my apparatus was set up on my desk;
As it is so difficult to illustrate the exact way the wires connect I would refer you to the diagram on page 2, to see the exact ways the components are connected.
Experiment to find the distance at which the output of a solar cell is at an absolute maximum
For this final preliminary test I have chosen to use exactly the same apparatus as in the first experiment for exactly the same reasons, however there is one additional piece of apparatus which I have chosen to use, this being a meter rule, to measure the exact distance the solar cell is from the light source. This meter rule is marked in millimetres, centimetres and inches.
The setup of the circuit will be exactly the same in the way the components are connected together, however in this experiment they will be placed differently on my desk, but the diagram on page 2 still applies.
I have chosen to illustrate how this experiment differs from the first;
As in the diagram on the previous page, please look for details of how the wires are connected to each component on page 2’s diagram.
I set this experiment up in this fashion so it is much easier to move the solar cell further and closer to the light source than if it were set up vertically. This way also makes sure that the ruler is flat at all times, so that the measurement is also more accurate.
This particular experiment has new safety precautions that have to be taken into account for (in addition to the points mentioned in the risk assessment on pages 1 &2);
- Work will have to be performed on a bench that is facing a wall and not into the classroom, as the light will now be facing horizontally and could cause damage to anyone’s eyes that come into contact with the naked light. Facing it at a wall however is not enough, so I will create a border around the whole apparatus from black card that is light tight, which will go to 0.1m above the top of the bulb sheathe, as below;
The card (being black), absorbs all the visible light, so no light escapes, this means that the risk of eye injury to myself or anyone around me is at an absolute minimum.
This is the only other safety procedure I need to take into account in addition to the first experiments risk assessment, as all else is the same, but the points put forward in the first risk assessment still all need to be taken heed of.
In this experiment I am going to move the light source further away from the light source gradually, at 5cm a time until I see it fit to stop moving the light source further away. This distance will be measured from the surface of the solar cell, to the centre of the bulb. I have chosen to move the lamp instead of the solar cell, as the solar cell has short wires attached to it, which could not reach as far away from the light source as I would like it to be, without moving all pieces of apparatus each move and this would not be good use of time.
To make sure that the solar cell is dead level facing the light source I will use a protractor to accurately measure that angle at which the solar cell is at, as well as the angle that the light source is at. I will first make sure that the solar cell is directly straight to the solar cell and to make sure that the lamp also stays straight I will put a meter rule either side of the lamp sheathe, tight, to make sure the angle cannot change and that the measurement is the same on both meter rules.
I will step up the distance by these 5cm gaps until I consider the reading to small that
I consider it not worth measuring, or doesn’t show up as anything more than the background light reading in the room, which in this case is not readable on the voltmeter and had a current of 0.2 milliamps. I obviously have to take into account the fact that background light levels change, however as the reading is so low it should not produce and extraneous results or affect the outcome massively, however it is worth mentioning again.
In this experiment of course I will be using a load of 3Ω, as this was found to be the load at which maximum power output occurred and will make the results easier to read, meaning I will be able to travel a further distance away from the cell while still gaining a current, voltage and power reading on my apparatus.
Again I have chosen to do at least two sets of results, firstly to check the accuracy of the tests to each other (and if they are of close correlation to each other, it obviously says that the results are probably accurate) and secondly if any anomalous results are found I can re-run the experiment as many times as I like, to see if this result is due to human error or should be there. I found it necessary to start at 0.05m from the solar cell and no closer, as the solar cell would get dangerously hot and the plastic could melt.
The results for the first attempt at this particular experiment are as follows;
I drew a graph to illustrate these results;
The results for second attempt of this particular experiment are as follows;
I’ve drawn a graph to illustrate these results;
Conclusion
It is clear even when you just look at the first table of results, without seeing the graph that there is an anomalous result 0.25m, as common sense would dictate that this table would have the power steadily decreasing in it, however at this point it quickly rises right back up to nearly the level of the highest result. The rest of the graph is quite fine and does follow a gradual curve down to being unreadable. I believe this anomalous result was due to the fact that many people at this time were moving in and out of the room and obviously when a door opens the level of illumination and background light in the room rises dramatically. To stop this happening in further experiments I made sure to inform the class that if anyone wished to go out of the laboratory they were to announce this to the whole class and when they wished to re-enter they were to knock 5 times and enter 20 seconds after doing such, to let people finish what they were doing.
The second set of results however appear to be perfect. A fast curve at first that gradually decreases in angle was formed. The results were very similar to the first test, apart from the anomalous result was not present. In the first 0.05m jump the voltage dropped by 0.08v, a very large voltage, however the second jump was only half of this (0.04v) and by the end the jump was a mere 0.2v. The current also followed this exact same pattern, dropping by 24.8Ω in the first jump, the second jump only being 15.2Ω and the last jump a mere 1Ω. This is conclusive evidence that, the closer a solar cell is to the light source the higher the energy output and as I found 0.05m was the closest distance I found safe, this is the distance I will perform my penultimate test at.
The reason for the point at which the light source is closest to the solar cell is the point at which maximum power output is found at is very simple. Photon energy from the light as it travels through air is transferred into suspended particles in the air, this of course means there is less energy in the visible light and the more air the photons travel through the more energy is transferred to the surrounding particles.
Another fact to take into account is that the sheathe in which the bulb is in does not have straight sides, they are at an angle;
This means that light does not travel straight at the solar cell, it follows the walls of the sheathe as well, however when the light source is close to the solar cell it does not have very long to spread out and most of it is still sent into the cell, but when you move further away, most of this light has followed these sides and stayed at an angle of 20° and do not reach the solar cell as they will have already been absorbed into the environment surrounding them.
The temperature was 19.5°C and the reasons for this being important are stated on page 7, lines 6-9. This could have caused any slight inaccuracies in my graph.
Evaluation
If I were to do this experiment again, I would devise my own straight edged lamp sheathe to replace the angled one, it would also be made from a shiny metal that is not painted, so all the light is reflected and not absorbed into the sheathe. This would eliminate the problems discussed in the above 2 paragraphs. Other than this only the points raised on page 8 are to be taken into account.
Penultimate Test
Experiment to find the maximum output of a solar cell from the angle it is facing the light source at
For this penultimate test I will be using all the apparatus that I have used prior to this, along with a few minor additions;
- 1 sheet of A3 paper – This will be used to put angle markings on which the solar cell will face.
- 1 wooden drawing board – This will be used to mask the A3 paper to, so it cannot move, as well as the fact that the solar cell will then also be lined up with the centre of the bulb (I have measured this and found that the centre of the solar cell does line up with the centre of the bulb, very accurately).
All other apparatus will be used exactly as it was in the last experiments. The diagram on page 2 is still applicable and of course the resistance will be at 3Ω and the solar cell will be 0.05m from the light source when the angle is changed.
Here is a diagram to illustrate the layout of this final experiment;
Again, please refer to the diagram on page 2 for details of how the components are connected.
I have chosen to change the angle of the solar cell by 10° at a time, from 0° to 90° (90° being when it is directly facing the light source and 0° being when it is perpendicular to the light source. I felt this was the measurement to change the angle by, as anything smaller would be very herd to do accurately and lead in inaccurate results. So, I have drawn 10° markings on my paper using a protractor. The lines start 0.062m from the light source, as I am going to be placing the centre of the side of the solar cell on this and pivoting the solar cell from this middle point and when this point is 0.062m away from the light source it works out that the middle of the solar cells surface is 0.05m away from the light source, which is my optimum distance.
I have now made sure there is no background light in the laboratory and my ammeter and voltmeter are both reading zero. This should make my results even more accurate.
I have chosen pivot my solar cell by heating a pin and pushing it through the dead centre of the base of the solar, this also goes through the paper I am working with, which is securely fixed down, this means I will be able to pivot my solar cell perfectly around this point. This will also save a lot of time and allow me to finish this experiment easily in a 1 hour slot and record all of my results. I am going to turn my solar cell all around 180°, through all my markings in this experiment. Although I know the results will be the same if there are no problems, but this will give me two sets of results for each 90°, meaning I can compare them and check my results are correct and accurate. The safety in the experiment will be exactly the same as the safety precaution used in my last experiment, as it will be wired the same and the only two extra pieces of apparatus I will be using are of no danger to anyone at all. Please refer to pages 1, 2, 9 and 10 for details. I will be using the face of the solar cell to make sure that I am at the correct angle, lining up the face with the lines.
The results for the first 90° I turned the solar cell are as follows;
I have drawn a graph to illustrate these results;
The results for the first 90° I turned the solar cell are as follows;
I drew a graph to illustrate these results;
Conclusion
These two graphs clearly are in close correlation and strongly agree with each other. However the findings in these graphs are quite unexpected, as I stated in my hypothesis I thought that the nearer dead on they were to the solar cell, the larger the output would be, however this is clearly not the case. It very clearly has a small dip after 70°. The graph starts by rising uniformly at about 2-3w per 10°, however at 40° it decelerates greatly and it slows down by a larger amount every 10°, until it reaches a peak at 70° and then drops gradually. So, at this point in time it would appear that the maximum output of my solar cell is roughly 12w (or between 11.989w and 12.008w) and found at 70°. The current in this circuit did roughly the same as the power did, started by rising by roughly 7-9 milliamps every 10°, until at 40° it rapidly decelerates and by a larger amount every 10°, until 70° when it reaches a peak and then drops gradually.
The voltage however is quite inconclusive; it doesn’t rise perfectly uniformly, I believe this could be due to the fact that my voltmeter only goes to 2 decimal places and is not acute enough. This could also explain why after 40° the reading does not change. I believe that it does follow the pattern after the point it stays the same, but cannot be measured.
Below is a graph to show the relationship between the angle and the voltage (for test one;
Below is a graph to show the relationship between angle and current (for test one);
The temperature was 23.5°C at the time the experiment started, this could cause slight inaccuracy in the load being placed on the circuit as the decade box is most accurate (0.1%) only at 18°C and as this is variable it could have made some of the slight ripples in the graph.
After these two experiments I decided to take it one step further and hone in on all angles between 60° and 80°, stepping up 1° at a time to find the exact point at which maximum output occurs.
The results were as follows;
I drew a graph to illustrate these results;
This clearly shows that maximum output is something between 11.951w and 11.913w and between 76° and 79°. However, I cannot get any more accurate than this, as it is obviously next to impossible to move something by decimal degrees by hand.
Upon first inspection of this graph it appears quite poor, however there is a simple explanation, the apparatus used is not sensitive enough to pick up every little amp or volt and just gives us a rough idea, however if you do look at it from a rough point of view you can see that the general correlation is correct and roughly where maximum output is found.
I believe that the reason maximum output was not found when it was exactly facing the cell is due to a few things;
- I of course was not able to keep the cell at the same temperature, as I had to start with the solar cell perpendicular to the cell, this means as it moves round, the cell heats more and the principles I discussed on page 3.
- There was quite a distinct shadow on the bulb from when it had been blown and this did appear to hit the edge of the solar cell more and more as it was more or less facing the light source and this shadow obviously means that the part of the cell this means the electrons in this part of the cell cannot move down the surface;
Evaluation
There were a few key problems with this experiment, these are as follows;
- The voltmeter was not sensitive enough and better results would have been recorded if it went to 3 or 4 decimal places, rather than 2.
- This can also apply to the ammeter, although the results are fine and appear to follow the right pattern; it could have been more accurate still if it was more sensitive.
- All of the improvements that were mentioned on pages 8 & 13, apart from the fact that I did in this experiment eliminate all background light.
- A device or machine would be useful, one that could move the solar cell by decimal degrees accurately; this would be more accurate and allow me to find the exact point at which it is at maximum output.
Formulae Sheet
The following are formulae that were used in my paper;
Current (I) = Charge (ΔQ) ÷ Time Interval (Δt)
Power (w) = Current (I) × Voltage (V)
W = QV
ξ = V1 + V2 +V3
ξ = IR + Ir
V =IR
V = ξ – Ir
Power = Energy Transferred ÷ Time Taken
So
P = ΔE ÷ Δt
P = I²R
P = V²÷R