• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

hydrated copper sulphate

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Analysis Experiment 1 Time (minutes) Mass of crystals, crucible + lid (g) 0 23.36 5 22.59 10 22.41 15 22.41 20 22.41 Mass of crucible + lid = 20.82 g Mass of hydrated CuSO4 = 23.36 - 20.82 = 2.54 g Mass of anhydrous CuSO4 = 22.41 - 20.82 = 1.59 g Mass of water = 2.54 - 1.59 = 0.95 g % of water by mass = (0.95/2.54) x 100 = 37.401575 = 37.4 % (3.s.f) Mr of H2O = 18 No. of moles in 2.54g of H2O = 0.95/18 = 0.05278 moles No. of moles in 1g of H2O = 0.05278/2.54 = 0.020778652 moles Experiment 2 Mass of hydrated CuSO4 used = 5.83g Titre Volume (cm3) 1 23.5 2 25.0 (anomalous) 3 24.1 Average titre = (23.5+24.1)/2 = 23.80 cm3 Volume of S2O32- = 23.80 cm3 Concentration of S2O3 = 0.1 mol dm-3 Moles of S2O32- in 25ml = (0.1 x 23.80) / 1000 = 0.00238 moles Moles of S2O32- in 250ml = 10 x 0.00238 = 0.02380 moles To find the number of moles of Cu 2+, we need to see what ratio the Cu 2+ and S2O32- react in: They react in a 1:1 molar ratio. ...read more.

Middle

= +/- 0.24317723 % = +/- 0.2432 (4sf) Total % error in experiment 2: Burette: +/- 100 x [(0.5 x 0.1)/ 23.5] = +/- 0.212765957% +/- 100 x [(0.5 x 0.1)/ 25.0] = +/- 0.200000000% +/- 100 x [(0.5 x 0.1)/ 24.1] = +/- 0.207468879% Mass of crystals: +/- 100 x [(0.5 x 0.01)/5.83] = +/- 0.08576329331 % Pipette: +/- 100 x [(0.5 x 0.06)/25] = +/- 0.12 % +/- 100 x [(0.5 x 0.06)/25] = +/- 0.12 % +/- 100 x [(0.5 x 0.06)/25] = +/- 0.12 % (Combined) = +/- 1.065998129 = +/- 1.066% (4.s.f) In conclusion it appears that in both experiments 1 and 2, the percentage errors are relatively small which shows that my experiments were fairly reliable and accurate. The values for % error give a clear indication as to which experiment was more accurate, its apparent that experiment 1 was a lot more accurate than experiment 2 purely because its percentage error was +/- 0.2432 % which is sufficiently less than that of experiment 2 with +/- 1.066 % error. In experiment 1 the weighing scale gave values to 2 decimal places; however the burette was correct to only 1 decimal place. ...read more.

Conclusion

Most significant error in measurement and modification > From both experiments, the apparatus with the least % accuracy was the burette. It had errors up to +/- 0.212765957% which is the largest error out of all the equipment. This error can be minimised by using a burette with a smaller diameter. This allows the meniscus to be seen easily compared to that with a larger diameter. By doing so a more accurate result is gained, hence a more accurate reading of the volume of solution in the burette is obtained and so the results are more reliable. > Another modification is to use a burette with a much smaller scale. by using a scale which is more accurate than 0.1ml would allow for a more accurate reading of volume during titration. This effectively would allow for more accurate calculations and therefore results of higher accuracy. > A burette which has a much narrower tip should be used. This is allows fewer drops to be added in a given time, in effect colour changes can be spotted more accurately thus preventing an excess amount (which is not required) added. This prevention allows for more accurate results, therefore a more accurate and reliable experiment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Organic Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Organic Chemistry essays

  1. Thermal Decomposition of Copper Carbonate

    Protect against physical damage. Isolate from incompatible substances Whatever cannot be saved for recovery or recycling should be managed in an appropriate and approved waste disposal facility Copper (I) oxide [Cu2O(s)] 1.62x103moles Low reactivity. Release of toxic gases during decomposition.

  2. Compare the enthalpy changes of combustion of different alcohols

    * Conducting the experiment the same way for each repeat that I do for each alcohol. Overall I may have to do the experiment 15 or 16 times. It is important that I do the experiment in the same manner each time.

  1. Comprehensive and Detailed Chemistry notes

    needed (closed vessels, absence of air -- A micro-organism such as yeast which contains enzymes to catalyse the reaction * summarise the chemistry of the fermentation process -- Simple sugars derived from plant material are mixed with yeats -- Yeats produces the enzymes; zymase, multase and invertase -- These enzymes

  2. Enzyme catalysed decomposition of hydrogen peroxide

    After all active sites are occupied, adding more hydrogen peroxide will not affect the rate of reaction. Factors that cause catalase denaturation, such as high temperatures, extreme pH, and non-competitive inhibitors, can change its 3-dimensional structure, rendering it less active.

  1. Determination of the formula of Hydrated Iron (II) Sulphate crystals

    of KMnO4 used to oxidise the Fe2+ ions, add the three titres together that are within 0.10cm� difference of each other and divide by three: Average titre:= (21.55 + 21.65 + 21.60)/ 3 = 21.60cm� Therefore, it requires an average volume of 21.60cm� of 0.01 mol dm-� KMnO4 to oxidise

  2. IDENTIFICATION OF AN ORGANIC UNKNOWN

    test tube and add a few drops of the unknown compound and gently shake. If unknown is either an aldehyde or a ketone, an orange/yellow crystalline will form so proceed to test 4 to distinguish between them. If no positive result is observed, proceed to test 5.

  1. Comparing the enthalpy changes of combustion of different alcohols

    Therefore alcohols will give out less energy in their combustion than an alkane of the same carbon number. Because of these facts, I can predict a number of things. Firstly, I can say that, per mole, larger molecules will release more energy in their combustion than shorter molecules.

  2. analysing the unknown compound A

    The reagents I will use for this test is 10% Iodine in KI which I will mix with 2M NaOH and then add to the unknown compound. If the unknown compound is a methyl ketone a yellow crystalline precipitate will be formed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work