• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I disagree with the statement "Only God has the right to interfere with our genes". We are the keeper of our own body, and it is entire our own responsibility to look after it.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Only God has the right to interfere with our genes' Almost all religions teach one common belief, the sanctity of Life. (Life is holy and belongs to God). They believe that only God has the right to create, to change, and to alter the life of a human being. And that anyone else who attempt to do similar things is committing a great sin. Like their attitudes to abortion, to euthanasia and to embryo technology, different people within the same religion have different attitudes towards the right to interfere with human genes. As gene related technology has only been developed recently, there are no direct teachings from holy books referring to it, which caused the different attitudes, as different people approached it through different teachings. Since the birth of the duplicated sheep "Dolly," genetic engineering has attracted attention from all levels of society. It raised questions of religion, ethics, and ecology that are of great concern to many people. ...read more.

Middle

Although the majority who agrees with the statement "only God has the right to interfere with our genes" are religious, there are also a number of non-religious people who held the same opinion. They argue that, as most of the mystery concerning human genes is yet to be uncovered, no one can be certain of whether or not if there is going to be a long-term consequence. Many mistakes had appeared while testing on animals, for example, salmons with growth genes put into them not only grew too big too fast, but also turned green. Genetic engineering also could not be reversed, so if a genetically modified baby went wrong, you could not just kill it. Many also feel that in the future, when genetic engineering is fully developed, people might be made to have genetic tests for insurance, jobs etc, to check if they have genes that are likely to cause illness. ...read more.

Conclusion

Personally, I think that anything done to make the world better should be approved, and genetic engineering is certainly one of them. Everyday on the streets, we could see people who are affected by genetic diseases, if a cure was found, their lives, and the lives of many people around them would be much easier and happier. Finding genetic cures is no different from finding drug cures; it is done to help, not to destroy. Furthermore, once genetic engineering is fully developed, people who oppose it can still choose not to use it, as some now do with euthanasia and abortion, but if genetic engineering never had a chance to be developed, then even the people who support it would never to able to have it. I disagree with the statement "Only God has the right to interfere with our genes". We are the keeper of our own body, and it is entire our own responsibility to look after it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity essays

  1. Cloning - The assualt on the sanctity of life

    Negatives Extremely low success rate as well as high incident rates of deformities and health problems amongst many test subjects. The exploitation of human life for the benefit of others as well as discrimination and other ethical issues. Violation of human rights.

  2. "Only God has the right to interfere with our genes"

    Some Christians have positive responses to genetic engineering whereas others have negative. Strong Christians say that it's a good thing and the church should support it because Jesus was a healer and taught Christians to do everything they could to cure illness. The Roman Catholic view is half and half.

  1. "Only god has the right to interfere with our genes"

    Muslims also agree that only Allah (god) should have the right to manipulate our genes and characteristics because 'embryo research involves abortion'. This is because the Islamic faith is against abortion as life is seen as a gift from Allah (god).

  2. Only God has the right to interfere with our genes'.

    Some people agree with the statement and are against genetic engineering for many reasons. Genetic engineering has too little information about long term consequences. Secondly it has effects that would be irreversible, so if anything went wrong it would be permanent.

  1. 'Only God has the right to interfere with our genes' - Do you agree ...

    Non-religious people argue stem cell cloning would only use embryos until it was easier to use the adult cells. Genetic research is an integral part of medicine research and is bound to include some genetic engineering. All genetic research is closely monitored by the law and so will not directly oppose religious morals but also has vast potential benefits.

  2. Recombinant DNA, genetically engineered DNA prepared in vitro by cutting up DNA molecules and ...

    When a toxic chemical or free radical causes damage to the cell's DNA, the p53 proteins signal the cell to stop dividing temporarily while the cell attempts to repair the damage. If the damage is too severe to be repaired, then the p53 protein activates a pathway leading to cellular suicide.

  1. Oncogenes are genes that cause cancer.

    was established beyond doubt by purification with physical techniques and visualization with the electron microscope. Tumor viruses became workaday agents in cancer research. In 1966, at the age of 85, Rous was awarded a Nobel prize. Some tumor viruses are oncogenic (that is, they induce tumors)

  2. Possible Cures For Migraines

    ?Rescue medication? can be used if acute treatment does not work. An anti-nausea (antiemetic) medication (to stop sickness), and an anti-inflammatory or pain-relieving medication may be prescribed. Using rescue medication a lot suggests that acute treatment needs changing. Solution There is no definite cure for migraines but some very effective

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work