Figure 1
Arguments for Preimplantation genetics diagnosis
Some people argue that PGD is the best technique which could be used to eliminate incurable genetic disorders.
Advantages of PGD include, this technology can help eliminate genetic disorders in the future such as, Tay-Sachs disease, cystic fibrosis, Huntington disease, X-linked dystrophies and others. Complete cure for these diseases are not yet to be found, therefore preventing the disease is preferable to waiting for the cure to become available.³
Most testing for genetic diseases is currently performed through amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling when the fetus is aged 10-16 weeks. If the examination findings reveal a genetically defective fetus, the options available to parents are to have a child with a genetic disease or to have an abortion. This is a difficult and often traumatic decision, especially in advanced pregnancy. However, PGD is performed before pregnancy begins, thus eliminating this dilemma and this would reduce the abortion rates. ³
Persons with a genetic disease or those who know that they are carriers frequently choose to not have children in order to avoid the risk of passing on the disease. PGD allows them the opportunity to have a child free of their particular disease. ³
The PGD procedure significantly reduces the chance of pregnancy loss. Statistics shows that patients who have achieved the PGD had experienced miscarriages in the majority (85%) of the previous pregnancies. When these patients used the PGD procedure, just 10% of the pregnancies were miscarriages.
PGD can also benefit families where one child is sick and requires a stem cell transplant. Also PGD holds the possibility of life saving cures for children through the birth of tissue compatible siblings.
Every couple would like to have a chromosomally normal child. They would like their children to have a good start in life and be healthy. One way to make this happen is to by using preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) as this enables the people involved in the process of IVF to acquire information about the genetic constitution of an early embryo.
Some people feel that they cannot cope with the extra responsibility of caring for a child with a serious genetic disorder. 4
Also test results of PGD are far more reliable than other prenatal techniques such as Chronic Villus and Amniocentesis. The risks of PGD are not as high as the risks of prenatal diagnosis.
In certain cases, PGD can be used for family balancing where a couple has had the same gender of a child continuously.
PGD can also increase the chance of pregnancy. Even though only about 12 out of 23 chromosomes can be tested, these 12 are the ones that most commonly cause problems. By replacing only embryos believed to be chromosomally normal, there is an increase in implantation for those patients at risk, as shown in two recent studies. 5
PGD could significantly reduce medical costs with the decrease in medically challenged children being born. Treatment of some genetic diseases can cost hundreds of thousands of pounds over the lifetime of a single individual.
Arguments against PGD
Some people may also argue that although PGD is a good scientific technique, there are certain disadvantages and misuse of the technique.
Instead of using PGD to detect the presence of genetic diseases and chromosomal abnormalities, parents may also use PGD to select the gender of the baby. This may cause gender imbalance, especially in countries like India and China where there is a strong preference for male children. 6
Parents could also use PGD to create genetically modified babies which is commonly known as ‘designer babies’. They can use PGD to select embryos having certain genetic traits which they consider desirable. This may be perceived as practicing some form of eugenics. 6
“I agree with the point where, you want to pick the sex, the colour of the eyes, the colour….that’s pushing it. But when it comes to medical issues, I am a bit sensitive and I think I would want options for myself.”
PGD involves a lot of work, skills, time, equipments and the technique of IVF. This makes the technique very expensive meaning that its availability would be to those well off not the poor. Also a couple who can conceive naturally would be required to undergo the process of IVF, an expensive process with no guarantee of success should they want PGD. 6
Another objection is that in the case of PGD, the risks of IVF must be taken into account. An IVF treatment comprises great physical and mental strain. Also, possible problems related to IVF, such as an increased rate of multiple pregnancies an increased risk of damage to the embryo/fetus or ethical problems of selective fetocide must be pointed out.7
If a genetic disorder or hereditary condition such as cancer or the gene for Huntington’s disease is detected, then the embryo would be destroyed. But these diseases don’t cause any harm until later in life when the children are old. 7
Preimplantation diagnosis is a form of eugenics. Its use paves the way for more explicit and dangerous forms of eugenics such as inheritable genetic modification. 7
“To me the quality of life is the most important thing above ethical beliefs or whatever you want to call it. You would want to provide, especially your child with the beset life they possibly could have, and if these procedures will help with that, then that’s great.”
PGD test results are not a 100% accurate. Even if a chromosomal abnormality is found, it does not guarantee that the child will be born with a particular disorder. 8
PGD is not a risk-free procedure, and is still considered experimental. The damage caused to the early-stage embryo from removal of one of its cells and the potential long-term health effects to the child selected are unknown. In addition, PGD relies on IVF, a burdensome and risky procedure with a low success rate of around 25%.8
“Eliminating incurable genetic diseases is good for the society and the people involved, but having to choose the build of your child or whatsoever, I personally think that’s crossing the line and misusing this valuable alternate solution.”
Alternate Viewpoint- Ethical and Religious arguments
PGD has raised many ethical issues. These explosive ideas are undergoing serious debates amongst people of the society.
Some observers believe that a unique human being is formed at the moment a sperm fertilizers an egg. PGD requires the creation of and sometimes the destruction of embryos, according to this view; it’s an act that destroys human life.
Others view PGD as unnatural and as violating a deep respect for nature. 9
Others argue that, PGD should be avoided even if it’s wrong or offensive because, its places society atop a slippery slope that will lead to genetic enhancements and human control of evolution. 9
If couples can request a baby boy or girl could picking one gender over the other become the 21st century's form of sex discrimination? Or could this upset the ratio of males to females?
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis also takes us back to the question of whether the destruction of an embryo is equivalent to the murder of a human. Children are going to hold their parents responsible for having made them this way. Currently there are no laws against performing gender selection in the United States. 10
“Some people who hold these various views want to see PGD banned permanently. Others would be willing to consider a temporary ban. Society has an opportunity to consider carefully the implications and benefits of this technology.”
Risks of PGD
Physicians and scientists are uncertain of the risks involved in microsurgery of the embryos, but believe them to be acceptably low. Numerous animal studies and same human studies show that the microsurgery of the embryo needed to remove the cells, does not affect the normal development of the baby. This procedure, however, has been performed in a limited number of studies on human embryos, so the precise negative effects if any, are unknown. In animal studies there have been no apparent problems and preliminary evidence with human true.11
Although people may consider PGD as a safe technique compared to other genetic screening techniques such as Chronic Villus and Amniocentesis, there are also certain risks associated with the procedure.
The embryo maybe destroyed during the biopsy procedure. Some embryos maybe damaged during removal. PGD could also give incorrect results-false positive result, in which PGD detects an embryo as abnormal which maybe normal. This embryo may not be transferred even though it may become a healthy baby. False negative result- PGD detects an embryo as normal which maybe abnormal. This embryo is then transferred and would lead to miscarriage or a child with defects.12
Misdiagnosis is also another risk of PGD. Within this chance of misdiagnosis, there is a false positive rate, false negative rate, the chance for no result and the chance for mosaicism. A mosaicism is defined as the embryo having cells with different chromosome make up. 11
Even though there have been more than 2000 live births after PGD of aneuploidy worldwide to date (May 2004), this procedure is still relatively new; and therefore, the major risk is that the procedure will not be successful in spite of all best efforts. 11
Conclusion
In conclusion, I argue that PGD should be allowed as long as there are proper regulations in place to prevent the misuse of this good scientific technique. I also think PGD should only be used in its intended purpose which is helping those who are at a high risk passing on a severe genetic condition to their offspring. PGD should be made available to couples who desperately need it not for those who intend to use this technique as a way of perfection for their child or children.
By limiting the uses of PGD and creating legislations to prevent the misuse of PGD, fewer embryos would be destroyed and created. Also PGD would decrease the rates of termination in countries. Also PGD would be an effective and fast way in creating life saving tissues for other genetic conditions or acquiring unspecialized stem cells.
PGD should not be confused with gene therapy or any other efforts to alter an embryo or persons genetic make up. PGD as currently practice can reveal a considerable account of information about an embryos genetic make up, but it is not possible today to correct or alter an embryo.
The allowance of PGD would reduce the number of babies born with diagnosable diseases. For example the cost of lifetime medical care of a person with cystic fibrosis is more than £1000 .PGD would gradually lead to the complete eradication of many dreadful genetic disorders. If one can prevent the birth of a disabled child, especially at an early stage, why should one avoid this opportunity? PGD can also serve as an answer to unexplained infertility.
I think the British people would be happy if PGD is allowed because, from a survey I performed, 15 out of 20 people said they would like to see PGD be allowed and also used for the right purposes.
When PGD becomes more widespread, it can serve as a valuable alternative to prenatal diagnosis and also be the cure for incurable genetic disorders while more time is spent researching for medicines.
References
1. Authors: JJ Marik, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California School of Medicine at Los Angeles; Director, Tyler Medical Clinic.
www. emedicine.com/med/topic3520.
2. Seibel, Machelle M., Ch. 42. Infertility: A Comprehensive Text-Second Ed.
http://www.americanpregnancy.org/infertility/preimplantationgeneticdiagnosis.html
3. www.e-medicine.com
4. Twenty First Century Science Text Book Higher Tier.
5. Zouves Fertility Centre. http://www.govif.com/news/newsletter.php4?vol=3
6. Author: Paavani.
http://ntu.edu.sg/home2004/PAVA0001/info.htm#Disadvantagesof PGD
7. http://www.genetics-and-society.org/technologies/other/arguments.html.
8. L.A, S.F.Meikle, C-Ferre, H.B Peterson, G. Jeng and L.S Wilcox. New England
Journal of Medicine. ISBN: 346-731-737
9. www.dnapolicy.org/images/reporpdfs/PGDDiscussionChallengesConference.pdf
10. http://www.doctorslounge.com/fertility/articles/pgd/pgd-tehnique/index.htm
11. http://www.govif.com/aboutus/breakthroughs-pgd.php4
12. Authors: I.Mune S, Magli C, Cohen J. Positive Outcome after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuplodies human reproduction. Hum reprod. 1994
Figure 1. www.475-baby.com/tmpl_images/embryo_biopsy.jpg
I think all my references are reliable as most of them from clinical websites.