• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

In this experiment I will be investigating the efficiency of a motor. I hope to calculate a range of results when the motor lifts varying weights.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

AS Level Experiment                                                                             Hermanjit Virk 12WSI

Electric Motor Efficiency Coursework

Plan

Aim:        In this experiment I will be investigating the efficiency of a motor. I hope to calculate a range of results when the motor lifts varying weights.

Apparatus:        Ammeter

Circuit Leads

Crocodile Clips

G Clamp

Motor

Power Supply

Ruler/ Scissors/ Tape

Stop Watch

Variable Resistor

Voltmeter

Weights

Wire

Diagram:

image00.png

image01.png

Safety:        In this experiment it is important to consider the safety aspects when carrying out this practical task; I will make sure of the following things before starting the experiment:

  • The circuit has been connected correctly according to the circuit diagram (Previous page)
  • Make sure that the connected leads are all working in order and are not tangled
  • Check that the motor is working correctly
  • The Power supply is working, and the voltage is not exceeding the limit
  • Check the circuit before starting and  be standing during the experiment
  • A Mat should be placed on the floor as weights will land on to the ground

Keeping the same

Changing

Current

Length of string /Height

Temperature

Voltage

Motor

Weight

Variables:        

Theory:        Efficiency is often expressed as a percentage. What efficiency shows us is the power wasted in the experiment, not all the power is used efficiently as it is wasted when the power is being transferred. The power source is transferred usefully in the external load, while wasted power is used heating the power supply and surroundings.

No motor can work perfectly, due to friction and other small factors. In other words, some energy is always lost and you never get out the energy you put in, this is what is being tested in this experiment therefore we hope to see if the energy is transferred well or not. the equation for efficiency is known as:

Efficiency = useful energy (power) output/ total energy (power) input x 100

...read more.

Middle

1.29 x 4.56 x 0.89

= 5.235336

= 5.24

0.7 x 0.9

= 0.63

0.63 / 5.24

= 0.120336116 x 100

= 12.02

0.8

1.29

4.56

1.1.00

2.0.96

3.0.92

Average: 0.96

1.29 x 4.56 x 0.96

= 5.647104

= 5.65

0.8 x 0.9

= 0.72

0.72 / 5.65

= 0.12749898 x 100

= 12.74

0.9

1.29

4.56

1.1.01

2.1.05

3.1.02

Average: 1.03

1.29 x 4.56 x 1.03

= 6.058872

= 6.06

0.9 x 0.9

= 0.81

0.81 / 6.06

= 1.336882509

= 13.37

1.0

1.29

4.56

1.1.06

2.1.09

3.1.11

Average: 1.09

1.29 x 4.56 x 1.09

= 6.411816

= 6.41

1.0 x 0.9

= 0.90

0.90 / 6.41

= 1.403658496

= 14.04

See graphs.

AS Level Experiment                                                                             Hermanjit Virk 12WSI

Electric Motor Efficiency Coursework

Interpretation and Evaluation

Conclusion:        As you can see from my results my prediction was correct, as you increase the weight on the                 motor it will have to do more work. As the voltage and current remained constant the                                                  efficiency became higher with the more weights that were placed on to the string to be lifted.                 Due to fact that the motor had to do more work, the time increased resulting in a positive                            gradient through my graph. Obviously the time was not as accurate as I would have hoped as                  the motor picked little weights quickly over short distances.

                The efficiency for the motor in this experiment was quite low, so not much of the energy put                 in was used usefully. The highest efficiency reached in my results was when picking up the                 top weight of 1N, which my calculations showed to have the efficiency of 14.04%, this means                 that 86.06% was wasted energy; this was probably due to the friction of moving parts in the                 motor resulting in heat and sound released into the environment.

Evaluation:         My experiment went reasonably well, I repeated my results three times this increased the                  amount of accuracy in the experiment, it helped divide error in time by three. I followed my                 plan making sure of safety and went through my method before conducting the experiment.                 The biggest error in the experiment as I have previously discussed was time, so it was                                             unlikely that any one could have had results that were perfect.

                Other errors in my experiment were caused by practical faults, or by a more technical reason.                 The voltmeter and ammeter persistently changed value in the experiment; therefore we can                 tell that maybe some resistance was carried in the connecting leads.

                If I was to test again, I would change the timing technique by using a light gate instrument.                 To use the light gate instrument I would place the weight at the start when it starts to moving                 towards the motor it will pass a sensitive sensor that then turn the time of through some kind                 force mechanism. This could divide the human error by about ten.

                If I could repeat the test I would test the affect of voltage on the efficiency, and I would use                 one set number of weights. This test would probably show us a decrease in efficiency as the                 voltage is increased.

AS Level Experiment                                                                            Hermanjit Virk 12WSI

Lens Coursework

Plan

Aim:        In this investigation, I will be changing the factors of object distance and image distance, to find the focal length of a converging lens.

Apparatus:        Converging Lens (2, plus combination of both)

                Blue – Tack

                Light Box

                Lens Stand

                Power Supply

                Ruler

                Screen

                Tape (Scissors)

Diagram:

image02.png

Safety:        In this experiment it is important to consider the safety aspects when carrying out this practical task; I will make sure of the following things before starting the experiment:

  • Equipment correctly setup (Above diagram), avoiding confusion, less chance of accidents.
  • Make sure that the leads from light box are working in order
  • The Power supply is working, and the voltage is not exceeding the limit
  • Check the circuit before starting and  be standing during the experiment
  • Lens should be affixed firmly with blue tack to the Lens stand, no chance of breaking
  • Light box working and in order, light should be bright and clear
  • Do not look directly into the bright light, where safety goggles
  • Work top should be cleared of any objects which are not being used in the experiment
  • Apparatus should be spread out neatly and spaciously

Keeping the same

Changing

Ruler Position/Measurement Points

Object Distance (u)

Voltage

Image Distance (v)

Light Bulb

Lens (2 converging lenses, both lenses together for one set of results)

Material of lens

...read more.

Conclusion

Evaluation:        I could have done the experiment differently by measuring the distances more accurately, for                 example the focal length as then I could have see how accurate my results were. To have                  done this I might have used a vernier calliper, which could have helped divided errors by ten                 times.

                I could have also have improved my experiment by checking the measuring points more                          carefully and this would have made the difference in accuracy. Using a setsquare to measure                 the middle of the lens was not as accurate as I would have hoped as the stand was where I                 eventually measured from because the ruler was in a fixed position.

                I also had anomalies as combining lenses probably was not that accurate as the glass was still                 separate from each other and maybe the results were inaccurate due to this. It was hard to                  choose the position to measure the light from as it was hard to be accurate in choosing where                 the light started as the bulb was covered from the sides as it was in a ray box.

                In think if I was to do this experiment over I would use a larger range in the lenses as it would                 have given me a better range of results, and when combining the lenses using something to                 hold them tight. I would have also spent more time in using a different measurements if the                 lenses could have produced a larger range of results.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses essays

  1. Does the focal length of a lens depend on the colour of light used?

    reciprocal of average V (1/m) 1.0 3.984 1.5 3.472 2.0 3.021 2.5 2.538 3.0 2.087 3.5 1.605 4.0 1.206 4.5 0.618 5.0 0.423 blue light reciprocal of U (1/m) reciprocal of average V (1/m) 1.0 3.978 1.5 3.497 2.0 3.049 2.5 2.584 3.0 2.110 3.5 1.642 4.0 1.242 4.5 0.654

  2. To investigate the relationship between the distance between a lens and an object, and ...

    The final factor is the surface and colour of the screen. A shiny surface would confuse the observer with reflections, especially if it were not flat while a "bobbled" surface would cause the image to distort and therefore the point at which it focuses would be harder to determine.

  1. Lenses experiment

    If the object is placed within the focal length of the lens, however, an enlarged virtual image is formed behind the object, on the same side of the lens. In general, in this case, the closer the object is to the lens, the less the image is enlarged.

  2. I intend to show how the position and nature of the image can be ...

    The exact position of the light filament was not sure, nor was that of the lens, with a more accurate way of measuring this (perhaps with a different object to measure other than a light bulb) the difference could have been a few millimeters which would definitely have increased the precision of the experiment.

  1. Relationship Between U and V For a Convex Lens

    * Dependent variable My dependent variable is the v (image distance). * Controlled variables Same lens, same focal length of lens, same light intensity, same position of window in front of the light. Range * Independent variable This will be 2 metres maximum, measuring at intervals of 10cm until 2m.

  2. My experiments focus is to obtain an accurate measurement for a specific lenss power.

    Dependant variable: This is the V and so 1/V value. Its value changes when the U value is varied and hence is dependant of it. Controlled variables: Voltage output: If I were to alter the voltage setting, the light source's intensity will vary which could result in a change of where the image is formed.

  1. Use of the material Zerodur in the KECK observatory telescope. The very low CTE ...

    Stainless steel - 17.3.5 Clearly then, with varying conditions within the building in which the telescope is housed; using other materials such as stainless steel would have caused major problems for the mirror. For example, using stainless steel; CTE: 17.3 �m m-1 K-1 Expansion for a temperature change of 5

  2. Aim To determine the refractive index of a material and the speed of light ...

    6° 12° 19° 25° 29° 34° 37° 39° Sin 0° 0.173° 0.342° 0.500° 0.643° 0.766° 0.866° 0.940° 0.985° Sin 0° 0.105° 0.208° 0.326° 0.423° 0.485° 0.559° 0.602 0.629° Table 1.1 Resolution: Protractor = 1° Graph of the Sin of the Angle of Incidence and Angle of Refraction Graph 1.1 From Snell’s law, the gradient (1.55)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work