• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

Investigate the relationship between electromagnet strength and amount of current flowing through the wire.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

image00.png

image01.png

image02.png

image03.png

Investigate the relationship between electromagnet strength and amount of current flowing through the wire.

1. PLAN:

Diagram:

image10.pngimage04.png

image06.pngimage05.png

image07.png

image08.png

image09.png

The Experiment:

I set up the equipment as shown in the diagram above. I put the variable resistor in the circuit to vary the current flow. I put the ammeter in the circuit to measure current flow at certain points. I then added an electromagnet to show that when electricity flows through a wire wrapped around a magnetically soft iron core, a magnetic field is created. I also added the electromagnet because we needed it to investigate the relationship between electromagnet strength and the amount of current flowing through the wire. Moreover, I added a battery consisting of 3 cells to provide electrical energy to the circuit. Furthermore, I added a load to the electromagnet to provide a measurement of magnetic strength of the electromagnet. Finally, I needed the clamp stand to hold the electromagnet and to balance the load. I also kept all the equipment the same throughout the whole experiment to maximise efficiency.

   In this experiment there were 2 variables; the independent variable (the current) and the dependant variable (the mass to pick up). However, to keep this test as fair as possible, I tried to minimise the effect of the variables on the experiment. Firstly, I  tried to measure the readings from the ammeter as accurately as possible (to the nearest 0.01 or 0.02 amps). Then, I tried to measure the load as accurately as possible.

...read more.

Middle

   However, if I do not reach the part of the graph where the points level off (if there is not enough current to line most of the domains up), then I will only plot the first part of the S-shape, corresponding to an x2 graph (a parabola of a quadratic equation).

   As a summary, I believe that as the current increases, more mass will be picked

...read more.

Conclusion

   The third factor, which may have affected my results, was the error in my measurements of mass. The masses I used (excluding the mass of the hook, attached to the electromagnet to hold the masses) were either 100g masses or 50g masses. This meant that the error in measurement was 50g. This made the test unfair, creating possible anomalous results. However, I tried to keep the graph as fair as possible by creating error bars on the graph to account for this factor.

   Finally, I could make a few improvements to this experiment, to make it even fairer. Firstly, I could perhaps record my current every 0.1A rather than 0.2A as this helps to make the experiment fairer with a smaller error range.

   I could also repeat the experiment 5 or 6 times to iron out any outliers and keep the results as compact as possible, with an almost perfect correlation for the graph.

   Lastly, instead of using masses of 50g, I could use masses of 10g. This would help to reduce the size of the error bars shown on my graph.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Electrical & Thermal Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Electrical & Thermal Physics essays

  1. resistivity if a nichrome wire

    This also suggests that my hypothesis was correct and as the length of the nichrome wire increases, the resistivity also increased. My graph also suggests that the length is directly proportional the length. 1) The cross sectional area of the wire Radius: 0.3 x 10-3 � 2 = 1.5 x 10-4 m ?

  2. Find out what factors affect the strength of an electromagnet.

    Same with the variable resistor and the wires used. To ensure this, I will obtain all my results in the same day. Results: Current Strength 1 Strength 2 Strength 3 Average Strength 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.5 2.1 2.0 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.4 2.5

  1. The aim of the experiment is to verify the maximum power theorem and investigate ...

    Except we have to know how to use the beam balance correctly, we should know how to minimize depletion of the balance. When we do not use the beam balance, we have to move one of masses to the right-hand sides.

  2. investigating the relationship between the diameter and the current in a wire at its ...

    Determining a maximum and minimum diameter for the wire I decided to use the maximum and minimum values of wire that were available. These were 14SWG and 32SWG. I decided to use all of the available thicknesses as it would give me a more accurate set result.

  1. investigating the relationship between the diameter and the current in a wire at its ...

    Variables - Variable Independent / Controlled / Dependant Diameter I Voltage C Current C Length C Resistivity C Resistance D Prediction - Since the theory suggests that R = 4 . ? . l ? . d2 R = 4 .

  2. Investigating the Smoothing Effect of a Capacitor on a Resistive Load

    -3 I have produced a log graph of logV against logC to check the linearity of the plotted points. The graph shows a negative correlation= -1.00, with logC decreasing as logV also decreases. I have also measured the gradient of my graph which works out to be: Gradient = y2-y1

  1. Energy Efficiency Experiments

    0.17 0.16 0.17 Voltage(V) 8.34 8.18 7.96 Mass (g) 800 800 800 Length of string(cm) 145 145 145 Time (S) 17 18 19 Input= electrical. Useful energy= gravitational potential energy. Wasted= heat and sound. Output= heat+ sound+ gravitational potential energy. Energy input = 0.17 x 8.34 x 17 = 24J Energy input= Current x

  2. Geothermal energy is not easily accessible with our current technology. Our main focus was ...

    The first step to utilizing all of these ways to lower water?s boiling point is to eliminate impractical methods. The only impractical method stated above would be using a vacuum; otherwise all of the other basic concepts have the potential to be implemented effectively.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work