• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

Investigate the relationship between electromagnet strength and amount of current flowing through the wire.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

image00.png

image01.png

image02.png

image03.png

Investigate the relationship between electromagnet strength and amount of current flowing through the wire.

1. PLAN:

Diagram:

image10.pngimage04.png

image06.pngimage05.png

image07.png

image08.png

image09.png

The Experiment:

I set up the equipment as shown in the diagram above. I put the variable resistor in the circuit to vary the current flow. I put the ammeter in the circuit to measure current flow at certain points. I then added an electromagnet to show that when electricity flows through a wire wrapped around a magnetically soft iron core, a magnetic field is created. I also added the electromagnet because we needed it to investigate the relationship between electromagnet strength and the amount of current flowing through the wire. Moreover, I added a battery consisting of 3 cells to provide electrical energy to the circuit. Furthermore, I added a load to the electromagnet to provide a measurement of magnetic strength of the electromagnet. Finally, I needed the clamp stand to hold the electromagnet and to balance the load. I also kept all the equipment the same throughout the whole experiment to maximise efficiency.

   In this experiment there were 2 variables; the independent variable (the current) and the dependant variable (the mass to pick up). However, to keep this test as fair as possible, I tried to minimise the effect of the variables on the experiment. Firstly, I  tried to measure the readings from the ammeter as accurately as possible (to the nearest 0.01 or 0.02 amps). Then, I tried to measure the load as accurately as possible.

...read more.

Middle

   However, if I do not reach the part of the graph where the points level off (if there is not enough current to line most of the domains up), then I will only plot the first part of the S-shape, corresponding to an x2 graph (a parabola of a quadratic equation).

   As a summary, I believe that as the current increases, more mass will be picked

...read more.

Conclusion

   The third factor, which may have affected my results, was the error in my measurements of mass. The masses I used (excluding the mass of the hook, attached to the electromagnet to hold the masses) were either 100g masses or 50g masses. This meant that the error in measurement was 50g. This made the test unfair, creating possible anomalous results. However, I tried to keep the graph as fair as possible by creating error bars on the graph to account for this factor.

   Finally, I could make a few improvements to this experiment, to make it even fairer. Firstly, I could perhaps record my current every 0.1A rather than 0.2A as this helps to make the experiment fairer with a smaller error range.

   I could also repeat the experiment 5 or 6 times to iron out any outliers and keep the results as compact as possible, with an almost perfect correlation for the graph.

   Lastly, instead of using masses of 50g, I could use masses of 10g. This would help to reduce the size of the error bars shown on my graph.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Electrical & Thermal Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Electrical & Thermal Physics essays

  1. Free essay

    Resistance of a wire

    50mm and 0mm where they seemed to have a huge difference in resistivity compared to other distances. This is expected but not to the scale that it occurred. The results we got could have been through human error in testing.

  2. resistivity if a nichrome wire

    This also suggests that my hypothesis was correct and as the length of the nichrome wire increases, the resistivity also increased. My graph also suggests that the length is directly proportional the length. 1) The cross sectional area of the wire Radius: 0.3 x 10-3 � 2 = 1.5 x 10-4 m ?

  1. The aim of the experiment is to verify the maximum power theorem and investigate ...

    3.88 3.88 5.84 5.84 7.81 7.81 In the experiment, we have made several assumptions: 1. Air resistance is neglect 2. The friction is evenly distributed on any surface of the sand paper (i.e. the friction should be the same over the whole sand paper.)

  2. Investigating the effect of 'length' on the resistance of a wire

    So if we double the length of the wire then the resistance will also be doubled. We can prove this by looking at graph No2 where the resistance of the length of 20cm is double that of 10cm, meaning that R2 = 2R1.

  1. The strength of an electromagnet.

    Magnets can be formed from certain metals (listed above). These metals have a crystal or domain structure. Magnets are made up of hundreds of thousands of domains. A domain is about1/1000th mm long and would consist of about 10 thousand million atoms. A domain is similar to a little crystal of iron.

  2. An investigation to investigate if current through an electromagnet effects the magnetic force?

    coils of wire are wrapped around, the material and also the number of turns on the electromagnet. I am only going to vary current in the experiment, all the other factors I will keep constant I have chosen to vary current because, the more turns there are, the more powerful the magnet becomes and therefore the more domains there are.

  1. Investigating the factors affecting the size of current flowing through a length of resistivity ...

    I) x A) ? l or rather ? ? A????I x l. Resistivity is constant at about 40 m?m and cross-sectional area is constant at ?* 0.452 = 0.64cm2 so l ? 1 / I. This shows that length is inversely proportional to current and so doubling the length of the putty, doubles the resistance.

  2. Energy Efficiency Experiments

    We recorded the voltage, mass of crane, length of string, and time it took to travel from the bottom to the top of it. Experiment 4- Crane (repeated 3 times) Experiment 4 Result 1 Result 2 Result 3 Current(A) 0.17 0.16 0.17 Voltage(V)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work