• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Investigating the Damping of Motion in a Simple Pendulum through Induced Eddy Currents

Free essay example:

Investigating the Damping of Motion in a Simple Pendulum through Induced Eddy Currents

Aim:

The aim of my experiment is to determine the different permeances of several metals by measuring the effects of  eddy current damping of the motion of a simple pendulum.

Apparatus:

The experiment involved the use of the following equipment:

Electromagnet

Power Supply

Retort Stand w/ Boss & Clamp

3 rectangular pieces of metal, of equal volume. One of Aluminium, Copper, Titanium and Steel.

A Pendulum Arm

An Axle

Two Small Axle Clamps, to hold the Pendulum Arm in place

High Frame Rate Camera

Method:

To determine the effects of the induced eddy currents, I will measure the time taken for the pendulum to halve its maximum angle of deflection. I decided to use a starting angle of 30 degrees, large enough so as to minimise systematic error, but small enough that repeating the experiment wouldn't take excessively long. By connecting a video camera to a computer, I will manually raise the pendulum until the arm is in line with a line marked at 30 degrees from the vertical. I will start recording, and then release the pendulum. Using frame by frame analysis of the video I will determine the frame when the pendulum was released, and the first swing in which the pendulum achieves strictly less than 15 degrees of deflection. By working out the number of frames this takes, and dividing by the frame rate of the camera, I can calculate the time taken. The equipment will be set up as in the diagram on the next page, although the camera is not shown in the diagram. I was careful to ensure that the pendulum's swing was perpendicular to that of the magnetic flux between to the two sides of the electromagnet, so as to maximise the flux linkage.

Background:

When a conducting material passes through a magnetic field, it experiences what are known as eddy currents. The relative motion of the conductor to the magnetic field causes a circulating flow of electrons inside the conductor. These 'eddy currents' create electromagnets. According to Lenz's law the induced current produced in a conductor will always flow in such a way that the produced magnetic field opposes the field which produced it. An increase in magnetic field strength, or an increase in conductivity of the material, results in an increase in eddy currents.

Risk Assessment:

Electrocution:

Likelihood = 1(Low)

Danger = 3 (Mild electrocution)

Risk Factor = 3x1 = 3 (Acceptable)

Dropping heavy equipment:

Likelihood = 1 (Low)

Danger = 3 (Possible fracture of toes, etc.)

Risk Factor = 3x1 = 3 (Acceptable)

Overall, the experiment is not a particularly dangerous one. There aren't any very risky procedures, and hence the likelihood of all accidents is low. The currents and voltages being used may, at worst, cause pain and burns, but the chances of electrocution are very low. Although heavy equipment is being used (namely the electromagnet core), it is not being moved regularly and as such does not present a serious risk, nor a reasonable chance of injury.

Resultsimage00.png

image01.png

image02.png

image03.png

image04.png

Other than the single anomaly, highlighted in red, the results of this experiment were very consistent, with at most .6 of a second difference between any two repeats. Overall, this method has proven to give good results in terms of consistency. The main limitations in my experiment were the maximum frame rate of the camera, and the fact that not all frames were recorded, as some were 'dropped' during transmission from camera to computer.  I made sure that I got the best results I could by setting the camera to it's maximum frame rate of 30 frames per second.

The results are not what one would expect. My background research suggested that an increase in conductivity would result in an increase in the induced eddy currents. Hence, a decrease in resistance would have the same effect, with conductivity being equivalent to (1/resistance). Following are typical values for the resistance of the metals I tested, in ascending order:

Copper

16.78 nΩ·m

Aluminium        

26.53 nΩ·m

Titanium

427  nΩ·m [1]

Austenitic Stainless Steel

690  nΩ·m

Thus one would expect Copper to be effected most by the induced eddy currents, when it was in fact quite the opposite. One possible explanation for this would be to do with the fact that the metals have very different densities. Because of the differences in densities between the metals, it was impossible to keep constant both the volume and the mass. Having opted to keep the volume the same, there was large variation between the masses of the metals. Looking now at a table comparing the densities of the materials (on the next page), we see the vast difference between the density of aluminium and that of the other metals. It seems that the large percentage decrease in aluminium was simply due to its lower mass, and therefore decreased momentum. In fact, the results seem to follow exactly the trend represented by the density – that is, the greater the density, the greater the momentum, and thus the less effective the eddy current dampening.

Copper

8960 kg/m3 [2]

Aluminium

2700 kg/m3

Titanium

4500 kg/m3

Austenitic Stainless Steel

8000 kg/m3

Conclusion

All in all, the experiment did not achieve its goal. Whilst the method did yield good results, the factors I was trying to measure were simply too small when compared to others over which I had little control.

I did not seek any help throughout the duration of my coursework.


[1]            Titanium By J. C. ( James Case) Williams, G. (Gerd) Lütjering, Lutjering, Springer, 1994

[2]        http://www.simetric.co.uk/si_metals.htm

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Fields & Forces section.

(?)
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related AS and A Level Science Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related AS and A Level Fields & Forces essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    The Compound Pendulum

    5 star(s)

    9 Using the International Gravity Formula 10, and taking into account that the latitude of Alnwick is 55.410307� 11, the value for gravity at the location which the experiment will take place is: 981542.3 mgals, which is 9.81 ms-2. A value close to this should be drawn from the gradient of the straight line graph.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Investigating the forces acting on a trolley on a ramp

    5 star(s)

    8.756 x 1.1415 = 9.994974 9.994974 - 8.756 = 1.238974 Hence when O = 10.8�, g = 8.756ms-2 � 1.238974 This can then be done for all other calculated values of g; When O = 6.6�, g = 6.381ms-2 � 0.902912 When O = 3.3�, g = 5.845ms-2 � 0.827068

  1. Objective To find the acceleration due to gravity by means of a simple ...

    measurement by using the above formula: Effective length L/m 1.251 1.127 1.027 0.927 0.827 Percentage error 0.16 0.18 0.19 0.22 0.24 Average value of the percentage error due to this limitation: = = 0.198 The percentage error of

  2. Investigating the relationship of projectile range and projectile motion using a ski jump.

    * Table drawn with the correct values to record the results Procedure 1. Set up the apparatus shown in the diagram using the clamp stand boss and clamp, and the plastic ramp on top of a table. 2. Place the carbon paper on the floor, placing 4 x A3 sheets of plain paper underneath the carbon paper.

  1. Young Modulus of Copper

    0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.0035 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.0055 0.0035 0.004 0.0045 0.005 N/A 0.0035 0.004 0.00425 0.005 0.0055 From the graph above , Slope of the line , S = 121.46 kgm-1 Young modulus of the copper wire , Y = S = X 121.46 = 4.48 X

  2. Determinating of acceleration due to gravity by timing a simple pendulum

    � 100%| =| � 100%| = 23.1% The maximum error in g = 9.69 � 23.1% = 2.24 ?The acceleration due to gravity g = 9.69 � 2.24 An interpretation of the results The value of g reflects the reality of the errors appeared in the experiment.

  1. Investigation of determination of flux density of magnets(plane)

    Equipment & Justification Tow magnets (which have the exactly the same size). This ensure that they have the same length( length of the conductor in the magnetic field) and the same magnetic flux. D.C power supply This makes the current flow in the same direction.

  2. Investigation to determine the viscosity of glycerol.

    The viscous forces being frictional forces act against the acceleration of the body and therefore there is a point when the viscous forces equal the resultant force driving the body. This is when the body reaches its terminal velocity."4 Through experimental verification Stoke proved that 5 Where: F = viscous

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work