As the amount of melanin in skin increases, so does the natural protection from sunburn. Individuals with dark complexions, especially those with olive, brown, or black skin, can remain in the sun for longer periods before burning occurs and individuals with fair skin burn readily.
Location and Atmospheric Conditions:
The numbers of ultraviolet rays that reach the skin affect the speed and intensity of tanning or burning. When the atmosphere is thick, fewer ultraviolet rays pass through or reach the skin. At the equator and at higher altitudes, such as the mountains, possible radiation from the sun is greatest because of a clearer and less dense atmosphere to filter out ultraviolet rays. As you move away from the equator or toward sea level, burning is less intense due to thicker atmospheric conditions. The number of ultraviolet rays at the equator is four times greater than those in Alaska or the southern tip of South America.
The UVB rays, especially, scatter throughout molecules in the atmosphere and cause burning. Because sunlight seems less intense, less bright, and less warm, individuals normally take fewer precautions and increase the potential for bad sunburn. Tanning and burning can occur on hazy days when the sun does not appear to be shining brightly.
Ultraviolet rays not only create problems on hazy days but also can burn the skin through clothing or while sitting in areas shaded from direct sunlight. Ultraviolet rays bounce off bright surfaces, such as sand, and can burn individuals sitting under beach umbrellas. Sky radiation on hazy days can hit the skin at angles and burn individuals not in direct sunlight.
Sun Screens and Sun Blocks:
Sunscreens and sun blocks are suntan lotions that contain one or more protective chemicals that absorb and scatter ultraviolet rays. These have a numerical rating system to indicate the specific amount of protection. The numbers, known as Sun Protection Factors (SPF), are listed on the product label. The higher the SPF number, the greater the protection. Sunscreen products, properly selected and used, allow the wearer to extend time in the sun without burning. Only opaque products, such as those containing zinc oxide or titanium dioxide totally block out ultraviolet rays. Often sun blocks are packaged or promoted especially for protection of lips, noses and ears.
Screen Selection: Use the SPF Rating
You have to select a sunscreen or sun block product according to the SPF rating to achieve optimum protection for your needs. SPF is a numerical rating system to indicate the degree of protection provided by a sun care product. It is based on a multiple of the time required by the sun to produce a given effect (redness) on an individual's skin without protection. For example, if your skin would normally burn in 20 minutes with no protection, using a sun screen product with an SPF of 6 means you could spend an additional 120 minutes (or 2 hours) in the sun without burning. This is based on first exposure to the sun after a lengthy period such as winter. The table below shows how you select sun care protection using the SPF rating with consideration to your skin type and personal history, environment and amount of time in the sun:
Prediction:
I predict that if I increase the factor of sun cream then the level of UV allowed through will decrease proportionally. This is because if you double the factor level you can stay out in the sun for twice as long, which suggests that you are only coming in contact with half as much UV radiation. Therefore I predict that if I had a sun cream of factor 4 which caused a 10% decrease in UV radiation reaching the skin, then factor 8 sun cream would cause a 20% decrease. I have made a graph to show my prediction:
This shows that the factor size is proportional to the percentage decrease. Obviously if there is any errors in my experiment then the final graph will be different from this. Therefore it is important to minimize errors.
Safety precautions:
There are not many safety precautions that need to be taken into consideration in this experiment, however the few that there are, are very important.
Obviously this experiment involves the use of electricity so the general rules for safety with electricity apply. Do not carry out the experiment in areas where water is present, because water is a good conductor of electricity and it could prove dangerous. Also do not obstruct walkways with equipment as people may trip over them.
Although not as harmful as UV from the sun, the UV lamp does emit UV radiation so it is better not to look directly at it.
Apparatus list:
Electrical circuit:
Before starting my experiment I did some preliminary work to check that my circuit worked and that the UV photodiode was actually sensing a change in UV radiation levels. I did preliminary work for no sun cream and for sun cream factors 4 and 8. I got the following results:
From doing this preliminary work I have learnt a lot. Firstly the preliminary work disproves my prediction. However I am going to remain with the same prediction for the real experiment because I do not think these preliminary results are that reliable. I need to make sure I keep the same thickness of sun cream for each factor.
According these results as you double the factor the percentage decrease increases by only 1.25. I will carry out the experiment fully to discover whether this is true or not.
Method:
Results:
I calculated the percentage decrease by taking the average P.D away from the p.d for no sun cream (4.86). Then I divided that answer by 4.86 and multiplied it by 100 to give a percentage.
E.g.:
Percentage change for sun cream factor 4:
Percentage decrease = (4.86 – 4.47)/4.86 x 100%
= 0.39/4.86 x 100% = 0.0803 x 100% = 8.03%
I have done three sets of readings for each factor. I took the average of the three voltage readings, which I then used to calculate the percentage decrease, which in turn can be used to plot a graph of percentage decrease against sun cream factor.
Analysis:
From the results I have obtained, it has shown me clearly that as you increase the SPF of sun cream the level of UV, which is allowed to pass through decreases. My results have no or very small deviation between them and so I can state quite confidently that was experiment was reliable.
I predicted that as I increased the sun cream SPF the percentage decrease would increase proportionally. So if I doubled the SPF the percentage decrease would also double. My results show this to be true. For example for the sun cream factor 4 there was a % decrease of 8.03% and for twice the factor, factor 8 there was a % decrease of 16.26% which is double. This is not exactly double, but I would not expect it to be because of errors in the experiment, which I will mention later.
Evaluation:
From my graph I can see that the results that I collected are very reliable as they all fit the line and have very low deviation, showing no anomalous results.
Whilst taking my readings my measurements might have been slightly inaccurate as the thickness of sun cream I used each time was not exactly the same each time. It was difficult to get an accurate reading of the thickness by eye, as the microscope slide was underneath the UV lamp. If the thickness were slightly different to what it was supposed to be, it would affect the level of UV allowed through. However it would be so minimal that I do not need to worry about it, as it did not affect my results.
The claims on the back of the bottles of sun cream appear to agree with my results. For example on the back of the factor 4 sun cream bottle it says:
‘The factor number 4 gives you up to 4 times the skin’s natural protection against sun burn.’
And on the back of the bottle of factor 8 sun cream it says:
‘The factor number 8 gives you up to 8 times the skin’s natural protection against sun burn.’
This shows that the factor 8 allows you to stay outside in the sun for twice as long as the factor 4 allows you to. Therefore the amount of UV allowed through the factor 8 will be half of that allowed through the factor 4 and therefore for the facto 8 the percentage decrease in UV levels passing through to the skin will be double that of the factor 4.
My results for these factors were:
As expected the percentage decrease for factor 8 is roughly double that of the factor 4.
The line on my graph is a proportional line. Therefore it is easy to determine the sensitivity of the sensor.
The sensitivity is the change in % decrease/ change in factor. In other words it is the gradient of the line. The gradient and therefore the sensitivity of the sensor if about 2.
If I repeated the experiment I would attempt to ensure the thickness remains the same for each factor. I would also try further SPF values of sun cream to strengthen my results. If there were any significant factors affecting my experiment then there would be a clear indication of it on the graph.
I took three readings of potential difference for each factor and I think this is sufficient for this experiment because each of the three readings were very similar, the biggest difference being, 0.02V.
I don’t believe I can really improve on the way I performed the experiment because my results were very accurate, as I had no anomalous results.
I did not encounter any problems whilst setting up the equipment, as it was simple and uncomplicated. I did not encounter any problems with natural light affecting my results either. Putting the black paper around my UV lamp and UV photodiode easily prevented this. My results are reliable because I repeated them and there were no contradicting results. The pattern that I have discovered for my results is as I predicted in my plan. The factor of sun cream is proportional to the percentage decrease it causes in UV levels:
Factor ∝ % decrease
To extend my investigation I could test more factors of the same brand of sun cream. I could also compare different brands of sun cream to see which is the most efficient at block UV radiation.
Bibliography
AS Advancing Physics by Jon Ogborn