• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9

# Investigating the relationship of projectile range and projectile motion using a ski jump.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Physics CourseworkChristian Fowler

Investigating the relationship of projectile range and projectile motion using a ski jump.

Introduction

As we all know ski jumping is a worldwide sport in which athletes skate down a slope ramp, gaining speed that throws them in the air that makes them land some distance away. The distance travelled at the time when the jumper leaves the ramp, until he reaches the ground is known as the jump range. This interesting and challenging sport involves a lot of physics behind it. Kinetic energy, gravitational potential energy, motion, speed, height, time, distance and the athlete's ability to reduce air resistance to their body are all factors that determine the athlete's performance. This experiment represents a ski jumping slope through which we will investigate and demonstrate how physics can be used by ski jumpers to increase their range in the jump.

Aim:  My aim of this experiment is to explore the relationship between the launch height and the range of the jump. I will use the my knowledge of physics knowing that gravitational potential energy can be converted into kinetic energy and using the equations ∆Egrav = mg∆h for gravitational potential energy and Ek = ½ mv2for the kinetic energy to work out the relationship between height, velocity and the range of the projectile.

## Hypothesis

Middle

Plastic ramp/run4 x A3 Plain PaperPencilWeighing scales (in Newtons)Clamp stand, boss and clampSpirit levelMasking tape4 Thick books adjust the height.Table drawn with the correct values to record the results

Procedure

1. Set up the apparatus shown in the diagram using the clamp stand boss and clamp, and the plastic ramp on top of a table.
2. Place the carbon paper on the floor, placing 4 x A3 sheets of plain paper underneath the carbon paper.
3. Make sure that the top of the ramp curves downwards towards the edge of the table, so the end of the ramp meets the edge of the table.
4. Weigh the ball baring using the weighing scales (in Newtons) and note down the weight.
5. Make sure that the ramp is secure, use masking tape if needed and measured accurately using the meter ruler. The height (h1) is 30 cm from the table to the point of drop – this will be the starting height.
6. Position the ball baring on the ramp where the bottom of the ball baring touches the 30 cm point. Steady the ball with your finger until release.
7. Once ready, release the ball baring down the ramp, making sure that it hits the carbon paper. Repeat this 3 times. Measure the range from the furthest point of contact on the paper to the edge of the table.

Conclusion

-2.

In this investigation, I have taken account of h1 as my variable and all other factors are being fixed and so remain constant. I can also investigate h2 if I will do this experiment again. It is different from h1 because the ramp will always be in a fixed position and so the angle of the ramp will not change. So, the initial velocity will always be the same.

## Conclusion

The conclusion to this experiment is that as the vertical projecting height increases, the horizontal distance travelled also increases. However, it is the air resistance and fiction of the ramp that limits the projectile motion. From my results, it shows that air resistance has little effect on the ball baring if the time spent in the air is less, when h1 is at a low height. However, if the ball baring travels in the air for longer, when h1 is at a higher level, the affect of air resistance is applied for longer when the projectile leaves the ramp and affects the horizontal distance travelled. From my results, I can conclude that my investigation supports my hypothesis and disproves my null hypothesis. However, this also proves that air resistance and friction is a big limiting factor.

Page  of

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Fields & Forces section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Fields & Forces essays

1. ## Experiment to determine gravity from a spring using digital techniques

3 star(s)

It also confirms Hooke's law, that F=k?x for a spring experiencing a force F and extension ?x. This experiment also calculated a value for gravitational field strength as being . Evaluation Overall, this experiment can be seen as a success, with the value calculated for gravitational field strength being very close to the generally accepted value of 9.81Nk-1.

2. ## Determination of the acceleration due to gravity (g)

4 star(s)

measurement of time than to reduce the fractional error in the measurement of height because the error in the measurement of time was doubled as square of time. The error of measuring time could be the time delay of the receptor pad to the electronic timer, although the time recorded

1. ## Experiment to determine gravity from a spring using analogue techniques

0.065 0.055 0.070 0.060 0.075 0.064 0.080 0.068 0.085 0.071 0.090 0.076 0.095 0.081 0.100 0.086 So the graph of mass against extension is: The equation of this best fit line can now be compared to the equation . Rearranging: Since x corresponds to the y-axis of the graph, and

2. ## Objective To find the acceleration due to gravity by means of a simple ...

What type of error they are (random or systematic)? How are they related to the final error in the experiment? Ans: There is inherent error in measuring the length. The values depend on the observer's estimation when the value lies within the deviation of the instrument. The error includes taking reading from two ends of the ruler.

1. ## Viscosity Experiment. The aim of my investigation will be to analyse the relationship ...

We can Write Down an expression for the forces acting on the ball bearing, which will combine to give a resultant force of zero. We can now return to the experiment itself, as we have understood the theory lying behind calculating viscosity.

2. ## Investigation to determine the viscosity of glycerol.

Since I am using the same ball for all calculations, the weight of the sphere remains unchanged. However the upthrust will have to be calculated at various temperatures because when you increase the temperature of glycerol its density decreases due to a lowering of intermolecular force of attraction.

1. ## Stopping distance Investigation.

For example, the height and angle of the ramp will be kept constant throughout, and the metre rules will always be in the same position. The brake will always be placed in the same place, and I will always measure starting and stopping distances from the same point on the trolley.

2. ## What are the physical quantities that affect the value of centripetal force when a ...

measured value of T is larger than the theoretical value m?2L there are discrepancies between them. This is because : (i) there is friction acting at the opening where the string is in contact with the glass tube, causing T is not extactly equal to the weight of the screw nuts ; (ii)

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to