• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Investigation to find a value of g using the oscillations of a spiral spring.

Extracts from this document...


AS / A2 Physics Coursework Name Nicola Morris Teacher Mrs. Farrow Date February 2002 Title / Aim Investigation to find a value of g using the oscillations of a spiral spring. Diagram A2b partial A4c complete + labelled List of apparatus Clamp Stand and G clamp Metre Ruler (0-100 cm) +/- 0.1 cm Slotted mass and mass hanger (0-1kg added in 0.1kg masses) Stopwatch =/- 0.01 seconds Spiral Spring Fiducial Mark Blu-tack Pointer Flag A2d some A4d comprehensive A6d full specification Variables involved (constant and changing) There are two types of variable within my experiment - dependant and independent. In the static experiment, the load is independent, kg, and the extension is dependant, m. In the dynamic experiment, there is the time period, seconds, which is dependant, and the load, kg, which is independent. F=ke, if k is kept constant. If k is kept constant, then my graph will show a straight line through the origin. This shows that F ? extension. In my dynamic experiment, T 2 = 4? 2 m/k . This shows that again, if k is kept constant, my graph will be a straight line, and T 2 ? mass. To ensure that k is kept constant, I always used the same spring and same masses. My range of variables was so that, my mass didn't exceed 0.7kg, as from my preliminary experiments, I knew that this wouldn't exceed the elastic limit. ...read more.


This was to ensure that I was measuring my oscillations from the same point each time. With all my readings I took at least two, occasionally three repeat readings. When I had my mass hanger with the slotted number of masses on it, I would pull it slightly below the level of the fiducial mark and let it begin oscillating. When it had done a few oscillations, I began timing the time for 50 oscillations to happen. I began counting at zero. When I had all my results, I found an average time for each load, divided it by 50, to get the time for one oscillation, and then squared it. I graphed these results. With the gradients from both my dynamic and static experiments, I was able to work out a value of g. 1/gradient of static experiment x 10-1 x g = 4?2 x (1/gradient of dynamic experiment) My value of g should be around 9.81 Nkg -1, if my experiment is very accurate. A2a outline plan A4a detailed plan A6c logical sequence Safety considerations * Use of safety glasses, to protect eyes from the possibility of the spring snapping during the preliminary experiment to test the elastic limit. * Cushioned landing if loads fall, so they don't bounce. * Keeping feet out of the way, as falling loads may injure the feet. ...read more.


Then to achieve the formula for the dynamic experiment, squaring the formula for the time period, we get T 2 = 4?2 x (m/k). These two formulae can be put together to gain g. A8b OK Aspects of the plan based on predictions/secondary sources/preliminary work For my dynamic experiment, I chose to measure t 2 against mass, because I predicted that it would give me a straight line, because of the formula : t2 = 4?2 x (m/k) Because I know that 4?2 is a constant, and k is the spring constant, I can plot t2 against m, and it will give me a straight line. They are the variables. I used the preliminary experiment to set my range. I found out from this that I couldn't time oscillations with 0.1kg because they were too quite, and tended to swing from horizontally, which flawed the timings. I also knew not to add more than 0.7kg to the mass hanger, as from my preliminary experiment, anything more exceeded the elastic limit. I predict that my value for g will be around 9.8. I know that the universal value of g is 9.81 N kg-1 but I know that my value will not be as accurate as this as my equipment will induce errors. A8c (A2 only) OK Use of secondary sources or preliminary work I derived my formulae from Advanced Physics - Materials and Mechanics, T. Duncan. A8d (A2 only) OK ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Waves & Cosmology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Waves & Cosmology essays

  1. Measuring spring constant using oscilations of a mass.

    0.400 83.30 83.28 83.27 83.28 2.78 7.71 5 0.500 81.88 81.89 81.86 81.88 2.73 7.45 6 0.600 80.45 80.46 80.46 80.46 2.68 7.19 Results Graph The graph for the final results is done on the next page. Significant Sources Of Error The difference between these values could be due to

  2. Determine the value of 'g', where 'g' is the acceleration due to gravity.

    is directly proportional to the force acting on it. However, * f- force * m- mass * g- acceleration due to gravity By substituting this into, we get:- The formula for mass spring system is:- AND = By re-arranging the formula we can get an equation of a straight line

  1. In this experiment, I am going to find out the relationship between Force and ...

    of proportionality was exceeded and the graph were seen to curve at the point known as the elastic limit of the stretchy sweet. Once this happened, the material no longer obeyed Hooke's law. I also observed that although the same length of stretchy sweet was used in the trial and

  2. The aim of this investigation is to examine the effect on the spring constant ...

    x = F/k) then: ks= F F/2k Which, rearranged algebraically equals: ks= 2k Evaluation The experiments that were used in this investigation were all conducted in a relatively short period of time and using relatively low-tech instruments. Yet despite this, fairly accurate results, displaying the predicted effects on the spring constant of parallel and series arranged spring sets, were obtained.

  1. Investigating the Vertical Oscillations of a Loaded Spring.

    * The spring under investigation. * A series of weights each weighing 100g and their weight/hook hybrid counterpart allowing attachment to the spring. * A stopwatch or other form of accurate timer. * Digital Scales to measure mass (I will be using digital scales as the give a more accurate reading than a top-pan balance).

  2. Investigation into factors affecting the time period for oscillations in a mass-spring system.

    1m Ruler �0.001m - The smallest measurement I will have to take will be the 0.03m amplitude of the oscillations. The percentage error in this measurement will be about 3.3% which is quite large but if the amplitude was changed so as to give a percentage error of 1% or

  1. An Investigation into the Factors, which affect the Voltage Output of a Solar Cell

    This proves to me that the smallest size can make a huge difference in the voltage output. Considering this I think the voltage output difference for each of the solar panels has proved why my results followed the general trend that I predicted but don't follow it in detail.

  2. An investigation into the time period of a mass-spring oscillating system.

    We repeated this up to 50cm. Each time we increased the length of the string, the time period of one oscillation increased, and because the distance needed to be travelled is proportional to the amount of energy had. This relates to our investigation - the amount of torsion energy is

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work