• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23

Lenses experiment

Extracts from this document...

Introduction


Planning

Hypothesis

        I hypothesise that moving the object further away from the focal point of a converging lens will decrease the magnification of the size of the image.

Apparatus

image00.png

Method

        I will set up the apparatus as shown in the diagram above. To decide which lens I am to use I will find the focal lengths of different lenses and us the lens that gives the easiest focal length to work with, this will be found out in my preliminary experiment.

        In this experiment I will be trying to prove my hypothesis, to do that the results that I obtain have to help me find the magnifications of different lengths away from the focal length. The object will be put on the focal point for the first result then I will measure the diameter of the object, this should always be 2.0cm, and then I will measure the diameter of the image. I will record my results into a suitable table; all of my results must be to 1 decimal place apart from the results for the magnifications, which will be to 2 decimal places. I will obtain results every 2.0cm and take four results so that I can take an average result for the object distance (U), for the width of the image and the magnification. I will obtain results every 2.0cm because the image size drastically changes at the beginning when moving it away from the lens just a little bit and less so later on when got past 2F(twice the focal length), therefore a small gap between results is vital or else when coming to make a graph of the results will cause major parts of the magnification change to be lost.

        I will choose a suitable range of results from performing the preliminary experiment.

Variables

...read more.

Middle

Diameter of image/cm

Magnification

10.0

10.0

Indescribable

Immeasurable

/

10.0

10.0

Indescribable

Immeasurable

/

10.0

10.0

Indescribable

Immeasurable

/

10.0

10.0

Indescribable

Immeasurable

/

10.0

12.0

Real, magnified & inverted

9.1

4.55

10.0

12.0

Real magnified & inverted

8.9

4.45

10.0

12.0

Real magnified & inverted

8.8

4.40

10.0

12.0

Real magnified & inverted

8.9

4.45

10.0

14.0

Real magnified & inverted

4.4

2.20

10.0

14.0

Real magnified & inverted

4.6

2.30

10.0

14.0

Real magnified & inverted

4.3

2.15

10.0

14.0

Real magnified & inverted

4.5

2.25

10.0

16.0

Real magnified & inverted

2.9

1.45

10.0

16.0

Real magnified & inverted

3.1

1.55

10.0

16.0

Real magnified & inverted

3.1

1.55

10.0

16.0

Real magnified & inverted

3.1

1.55

10.0

18.0

Real magnified & inverted

2.1

1.05

10.0

18.0

Real magnified & inverted

2.3

1.15

10.0

18.0

Real magnified & inverted

2.1

1.05

10.0

18.0

Real magnified & inverted

2.3

1.15

10.0

20.0

Real same size & inverted

2.0

1.00

10.0

20.0

Real same size & inverted

2.0

1.00

10.0

20.0

Real same size & inverted

2.0

1.00

10.0

20.0

Real same size & inverted

2.0

1.00

10.0

22.0

Real diminished & inverted

1.5

0.75

10.0

22.0

Real diminished & inverted

1.6

0.80

10.0

22.0

Real diminished & inverted

1.6

0.80

10.0

22.0

Real diminished & inverted

1.7

0.80

10.0

24.0

Real diminished & inverted

1.2

0.60

10.0

24.0

Real diminished & inverted

1.3

0.65

10.0

24.0

...read more.

Conclusion

        As you can see my results become increasingly inaccurate as the experiment progressed but was completely accurate when the object distance was 20.0cm, which was in the middle of the experiment.

I could have done this experiment with different sized convex lenses instead of just using the one type, but for this I would have needed a lot more time. I could have done the entire experiment on the same day because the weather on different days can affect the accuracy of the results and dependant on how focused I was on different days could have affected the results but by looking at the results I believe I was on the ball throughout the experiment. Instead of having results in intervals of 2.0cm I could have decreased this to 1.0cm or even 0.5cm. I would not go any lower than this for my accuracy to decimals would not be very accurate. Having a smaller gap between results would allow my to have more results to help me in my graph for at the beginning I do no know what is exactly happening in between the dramatic decline in magnifications.

Two more possibilities when using the same basic equipment would to do more repeats because you can never have enough repeats and to have a larger range in results to possibly see if the magnification is ever equal to 0 or if the magnification eventually goes so far that the magnification stops decreasing.

As far as the use of the apparatus goes I could have changed the odd thing realistically. I could have changed the light source from a lamp which is not a light source that gives off parallel rays of light I could have used a light source that gave off parallel rays of light for example the sun, but that would not be a very good thing to use in England because the amount of sunlight given off always changes according to typical English weather.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Physics coursework; Finding the focal length of a lens using a graphical method.

    4 star(s)

    Similarly the angle of the screen may not have been at exactly a 90 degree angle to the ruler, (though I can be sure its base was.) These limitations may have the effect of making my conclusions inaccurate because they could have affected my measurements of u and v, from

  2. In this experiment I will be investigating the efficiency of a motor. I hope ...

    As the voltage and current remained constant the efficiency became higher with the more weights that were placed on to the string to be lifted. Due to fact that the motor had to do more work, the time increased resulting in a positive gradient through my graph.

  1. Does the focal length of a lens depend on the colour of light used?

    The only variable will be object distances and the type o filter. I will be doing repeats so that my results become more reliable, and therefore ensure a more accurate conclusion and a higher likelihood of success in completing my aim.

  2. Measurement of the focal lengths of a concave lens and a convex mirror ...

    Precaution: 1. The battery should be set to its minimum value in the beginning because it could avoid overheating of the light bulb. 2. The experiment should be set in a darkroom to make the image clearer. Caution: 1. The lens and mirror should be handled carefully to prevent broken Result: 1.

  1. Relationship Between U and V For a Convex Lens

    Which would mean it would enable us to get a wider and clearer range of results. 'RED LENS CHOOSEN' ANALYSIS The fat lenses instantly weren't chosen because they produced images that were to small to measure, and could only be measured at large distances for v.

  2. The focal length of a convex lens.

    The position of the lens was recorded. 3. The lens was moved towards the screen until a diminished sharp image was formed on the screen. The positions of the lamp house or the screen should not be changed. The displacement (a)

  1. To investigate the relationship between the distance between a lens and an object, and ...

    between the lens, the object and the screen, I must ensure that the other factors are kept constant throughout. The lens used will obviously affect the results, as different lenses have differing focal points, and varying the focal points would defy the objective of this investigation.

  2. Measuring the focal length of a lens for red and green light- Case Study

    Chromatic aberration: Chromatic aberration is a defect whereby they lens cannot converge all the different colours in the spectrum at the same point. The problem with this is that all the different colours of light have different wavelengths. These different wavelengths of the different coloured light affect the convergence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work