• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17

Measuring spring constant using oscilations of a mass.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

MEASURING SPRING CONSTANT USING OSCILATIONS OF A MASS.

Aim

The aim of this experiment is to use oscillations of a mass on a spring to the find the spring constant, k and the effective mass of the spring. The reason to carry out this experiment is to find the value of the effective mass, me and to see if it is small enough to be ignored as some teachers think or not.

Apparatus

  • Spring
  • Weights
  • Stopwatch
  • Retord Stand
  • Clamp
  • Table

Apparatus Specification

Apparatus

Range Of Measurement

Maximum Measurement

Minimum Measurement

Weights

0.100Kg – 0.600Kg

0.600Kg

0.100Kg

Stopwatch

0.01 sec – 356400.00 sec

356400.00 sec

0.01 sec

Method

The apparatus will be set up as shown in the diagram.

The Retord stand and the clamp are going to be used to hang the spring a certain height above the surface of the table. The masses are going to be kept nearby along with the stopwatch to measure the oscillations. Initially the time will be recorded for 0.100Kg. The spring would be given a reasonable vertical displacement for which the time would be recorded. Which is the time for 20 oscillations. The time recorded would be for 20 oscillations. This experiment is then repeated for the same weight three times and then for the rest of the weights up to 0.600Kg. The reason to carry out the experiment three different times for the same mass is to get a reasonable average. The times will be recorded in the results table, a graph would be drawn and the values of k and me

...read more.

Middle

1

0.100

7.74

0.387

0.150

3

0.300

13.03

0.652

0.424

6

0.600

18.29

0.915

0.836

Preliminary Graph

The graph of the preliminary results is done on the next page

If I use the results that I got and my graph the preliminary values that I get for k and me are as follows:

k        =        4 π2 / M

k         =        4 π2 / 1.373        

k        =        28.75

If I use this value of k my preliminary value for mewould be:

me        =        C  x  k / 4 π2

me        =        0.0125 x 28.77 / 4 π2

me        =        0.00910 kg

My preliminary results come up with the value for k of 28.75 and value of me, which is 0.00910 kg.

The worked out value for k is quite different to the value that was obtained by the force/extension data. The value of effective mass, meisn’t that different to the real value. The actual values of k and me, are 23.88 and 0.00900 kg respectively.

The difference between these values could be due to the following reasons among with others:

  • I couldn’t measure the time properly for the oscillations meaning that I took more time to react after I saw the spring go above or below the fiducial marker.
  • It could also be because the mass added on the spring could have been a little different (e.g. 0.605Kg instead of 0.600kg) then mentioned on the mass itself.

While I am working for my real results I would have to careful about avoiding these mistakes or these reasons for errors as much as I can so that the value I get for k and meare more accurate.

Results

...read more.

Conclusion

Using more then thirty periods for the heights might not have been that accurate due to it taking more time and the increased number might result in losing count.

Less then thirty periods would insure that this technique could be applied in practise but would not be sufficient to form a reliable conclusion and analysis upon.

Comment On Reliability Of Conclusion

According to the analysis and the calculations made my conclusion would be reliable in the sense that the calculated value of g is quite good and accurate to the actual value of g meanwhile the calculated value of h is a bit far from the actual and predicted value. The percentage error in the actual value of h is 3.30%, meanwhile the percentage error of g is 3.25%.

This means that the conclusion is reliable more in favour of g than in h.

Future Improvements Or Further Work

As suggested earlier if the technique of the experiment was to be improved using an electronic timing device that is connected to a computer, so it can also help to plot the graphs.  This method would avoid any additional time taken by the human and avoid any systematic error to quite an extent.

A second improvement could be that the for the height something suitable like a Vernier calliper or more then one set square be used to make sure that the height if the pendulum is accurate.

Cable Trunking Experiment                -  –

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Waves & Cosmology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Waves & Cosmology essays

  1. Investigating the relationship between the mass and time period in a spring-mass system

    on the weight hanger 550g weights on the weight hanger 600g weights on the weight hanger ANNY ADITIONAL/REPEATED READINGS Comment: Comment: TABLE OF RESULTS The mass of the weight hanger: ......99.54g............. The height which weights are pushed up before "launch":......2cm......

  2. The aim of this investigation is to examine the effect on the spring constant ...

    Applying this to the above equation produces a fairly accurate approximation for the gradient of the line of best fit and as stated earlier, this result is also the system's spring constant. These values have been compiled to form the following table: Single Series Parallel Avg of 1st 5 ext's (x1)

  1. Investigating the Vertical Oscillations of a Loaded Spring.

    I will make sure that the clamp holding the spring and weights are over the base of the retort so as to insure that the retort-stand will not fall over. Theory: In this investigation I shall be using the equation T2=4P2 x M K Where T is time period for

  2. Experiment B11: Measuring focal length of lenses

    screen, but so much time needs to be spent to find the suitable positions for both apparatus. In this method, no graph and less calculation are needed to measure the mean focal length of the concave lens. Therefore, fewer errors occur and the measured value is more accurate.

  1. Determine the value of 'g', where 'g' is the acceleration due to gravity.

    Extension (m) Time for 10 oscillation (s) Time period (s) (Time period)2 (s2) 0 0.021 0 0 0 0 0.050 0.035 0.014 2.70 0.270 0.073 0.100 0.053 0.032 4.01 0.401 0.161 0.150 0.069 0.048 4.95 0.495 0.245 0.200 0.089 0.068 5.52 0.552 0.305 0.250 0.109 0.088 6.18 0.618 0.382 0.300 0.122 0.101 6.75 0.675 0.456 0.350 0.144

  2. Making sense of data - finding a value for the young modulus of a ...

    Measurements taken on the ruler had some errors and they were the initial bend of the ruler due to its own weight affecting the deflection, weights hung on different positions on one end of the ruler affecting the deflection. Also the slight variation in the length of the overhang of

  1. Investigation into factors affecting the time period for oscillations in a mass-spring system.

    As predicted from the relationship T = 2?VM/k, as the mass applied to the system increases, the time for an oscillation increases exponentially. The relationship can be confirmed as the graph of T2 against M is a straight line through the origin.

  2. Physics - The aim of this practical investigation was to obtain a value for ...

    From the graph I took two gradients for each line and calculated an average gradient for each for accuracy. These gradients worked out to be. Maximum grad. = up/across k = ?F/?x k1 = 2.87 / 0.35 = 8.19 k2 = 2.37 / 0.29 = 8.16 kmax mean = 8.19 + 8.16 = 8.18 2 Minimum grad.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work