• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Ohm's Law Physics Lab #20

Extracts from this document...


Ohm's Law Physics Lab #20 Name: Diana Abou Hassan Partners: Sara Jaber Michael Muhanna Rami Jachi Date Performed: 14/11/2002 Date Due: 21/11/2002 Teacher: Mrs. Khoury Saab Objective: The objective of this lab is to determine the relationship between the potential difference across a conductor and the electric current through it. \ Materials: - Low voltage variable DC power supply\ - Two different resistors - 2 digital multimeters - connecting wires Procedure: Please refer to lab sheet. Data Collected: Resistor 2 Voltage (V) 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Current (mA + 0.01mA) 0.42 0.72 1.16 1.56 1.91 2.30 Potential Difference (V + 0.001V) 0.526 0.877 1.404 1.893 2.324 2.796 Resistor 7 Voltage (V) 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Current (mA + 0.01mA) ...read more.


5.06 K? 6.96? Calculate the percentage error: Sample calculation: Percentage error of Resistor 2 % error = (Difference in measurements/Average of measurements)* 100% Difference in measurements = 0.828 K? - 1.202 K? = [-0.374 K?] = 0.374 K? Average of measurements = (0.828 K? + 1.202 K?) / 2 = 1.015 K? Percentage error = (0.374 K? / 1.015 K?) * 100% = 37% Percentage error of Resistor 7 = 0.2% Discussion: Ohmic materials are known to maintain a constant resistance regardless of the voltage. This explains why after plotting the graphs of Resistor 2 and Resistor 7 the end results are straight lines. This shows that the potential difference (voltage) and the current are directly proportional therefore maintaining an unchanging slope which represents the resistance. ...read more.


This is why the slope of the line after the light has been lit is curved. Sources of Error: The manual adjustment of the voltage may have caused some error as we may have not adjusted it to the exact values required. If there were a more detailed and precise knob, it could reduce the error. Also, the wire were very rusty therefore acting as very poor conductors. The obvious solution would be to use newer wires. Conclusion: The purpose of this lab was to see how the potential difference and the electric current going through a conductor are related. By graphing the results it showed that they were directly proportional. This proved to be correct also for the cold resistivity of the light bulb, however the resistivity of the light bulb after it lit up contradicted Ohm's law as the resistivity did not remain constant. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Electrical & Thermal Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Electrical & Thermal Physics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Determining Avogadro's Number Lab

    4 star(s)

    Thus, the time after 10 minutes is 600 seconds ±0.833%. Charge: After 10 minutes Average charge = average current x time Average charge = 0.9 A x 600 seconds Average charge = 540 C Percent uncertainty of

  2. Peer reviewed

    Measurement of the resistivity of Nichrome

    5 star(s)

    There are several possible sources of error and uncertainty in the experiment. 1. The most likely error might be reading the ammeter and voltmeter. As the voltage and current are always changing, it is hard to read precisely.

  1. Peer reviewed

    Investgating resistivity - Planning and Implementing

    4 star(s)

    To prevent this, the current and voltages must not be allowed to fall below 0.2, and be kept as high wherever possible. The error in the diameter is, at the very most, 0.005mm. This means the error in the diameter is However, this value is squared in calculating the area,

  2. Finding the Resistivity of a Wire

    However, my graph shows that this was fairly irrelevant, due to the reliability of the line for best fit. o Area of cross-section of wire: I cannot be sure that the wire was cylindrical throughout the wire, which could have affected the resistivity value, though by taking several readings and

  1. Physics - Resistivity

    Since electrons are negatively charged, they flow towards the positive terminal in the cell (opposites attract). As we can see from this the actual electrons and their charge are flowing from the negative terminal in the cell to the positive.

  2. Choosing a light source

    from my result above, I will be testing my graph to see whether it obeys inverse square law. In order to find out I will be doing some calculations. Looking at the light metre and taking the point, i.e. where the light metre's brightness is 300 lux Now look at

  1. To investigate whether the two resistors and the bulb given is an ohmic or ...

    Skill 5 Conclusions and Evaluations Conclusions To conclude from the V/I graphs, Resistor 1 (#8) has a resistance of 53.3? (?6?). Resistor 2 (#3) has a resistance of 20? (?2?). The uncertainty values here are deduced by using the min/max resistance error values, calculated from the graphs.

  2. Investigating the factors affecting the size of current flowing through a length of resistivity ...

    An ammeter with 1A and 100mA shunts. 3. A voltmeter. 4. A rheostat. 5. Resistance putty. 6. Leads. 7. Copper plates. 8. Crocodile clips. 9. Plastic and wooden boards. 10. 5 mm and 9 mm rollers. 11. Plastic gloves.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work