• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Only God has the right to interfere with our genes' - Do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...


2) ' Only God has the right to interfere with our genes' - Do you agree with this statement? Our genes are the sequence of DNA or genetic codes that determine our characteristics. So by changing our genetics we must be effectively changing our characteristics and ultimately ourselves. Is this simply medical care that is no different from taking everyday medicine like antibiotics? Or are we inauspiciously playing God and immorally defying nature in order to safeguard our species? In my opinion scientific progress is enabling lives to be saved and a loving God would not condemn this. A religious person may look at different aspects of genetic engineering and thus hold a different view. Genetic engineering in humans is the development or manipulation of genes used to prevent disease and disabilities. Genetic diseases are serious and affect a vast number of people. Diseases or 'genetic disorders' like Huntington's, Sickle -cell anaemia, muscular dystrophy and cystic fibrosis can cause mental retardation, physical deformity or early death. Research into genes and genetic engineering can help prevent these problems and is surely ethical and not immoral. Most genetic research is based on germline therapy that enables genetic changes to the cells carrying the disorder from generation to generation. This means that permanent changes can be made in the person's genetic code that prevents the transmission of these cells. ...read more.


Religions recognise that in the modern world they must deal with issues like genetic engineering and amongst them there are different views of weather we, as humans, have the right to interfere with our own genes. Christianity is not harmogenous and so within it there are different attitudes towards genetic engineering. It is mainly the more liberal protestant Christians who think that genetic engineering is a good thing and see the positive aspects like the potential curing of disease and the negative, which would be the potential creation of artificially produced 'perfect humans'. There are religious reasons why these Christians support this scientific research and action. Jesus was a healer who showed that Christians should do what they can to heal and help healers and to cure disease. They believe that as humans we stewards on God's earth and by discovering the genetic make up of humans in order to help improve human life is fulfilling this stewardship. They believe that this is no different from researching medicine that can improve human life and reduce suffering. Regarding the potential of this technology getting out have hand, these Christians believe that creating cells is very different from creating people. Creating people via science rather than through sex would be wrong because as it would be taking over 'God's creator of life role', but creating cells is working with God. ...read more.


In the way that some Christians believe in stewardship, these Muslims believe that humans should work as vice-gerents in hiding and supporting lives. This no different from researching medicine that will help improve lives and reduce suffering. These Muslims also believe there is a difference between creating cells and creating people and that creating cells is working with God. They also consider that embryos can be used for research up until they are 14 days old, this is when the human life begins according to teachings of the Shari'ah. It is very difficult to foresee if the potential good of genetic engineering and 'interfering with genes' outweighs the potential bad and whether it is ethical in it's current state of research. I think that at the moment we have a very good idea of what the positive effects of 'interfering with our genes' would be. It could cure diseases and prevent them from being passed on to generation after generation. The negative effects are slightly unclear. Will we end up producing genetically modified "perfect humans" who are lacking in will and spirit through no fault of their own? Is producing humans without sex wrong even? Is it against the will of God? Personally I think that the these questions go unanswered by the critics of genetic engineering who do not have plausible enough arguments to stop the research into curing disease and saving human life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity essays

  1. Recombinant DNA, genetically engineered DNA prepared in vitro by cutting up DNA molecules and ...

    A virus consists of a core of nucleic acid surrounded by a protein coat called a capsid; some viruses also have an outer envelope composed of fatty materials and proteins. The nucleic-acid core is the essential part of the virus--it carries the virus's genes.

  2. Oncogenes are genes that cause cancer.

    Second, it is relatively easy to identify and isolate retrovirus oncogenes and to find their products, and so they have provided the first glimpse of the chemical processes responsible for cancerous growth. Third, retrovirus oncogenes do not appear to be indigenous components of the viral genome; instead they seem to

  1. Cell Theory - Discuss the theory that living organisms are composed of cells.

    amino acids are added by complementary base pairing and peptide bondage * termination - terminator codon releases polypeptide chain 6.4.4 State that translation occurs in a 5'--> 3' direction. Translation occurs in 5' - 3' direction 6.4.5 Explain the process of translation including ribosomes, polysomes, start codons and stop codons.

  2. 'Only God has the right to interfere with our genes' Do you agree? Give ...

    Another reason as to why religions may be against scientists interferring is because the parents may choose ceratin features to be included in their child and this would be like creating a designer baby, which would mean you are altering Gods original creation of children on donors.

  1. Genetic Engineering Should be Banned

    Now think about the apples you walk by every time you visit the grocery store. Maybe there's even one sitting on your kitchen table. They are different. Thanks to genetic engineering technology, scientists have figured out how to modify these natural goodies to exhibit the pinnacle of perfection.

  2. I disagree with the statement "Only God has the right to interfere with our ...

    Heal the sick who are there and tell them, "The kingdom of God is near you."' This quote from the bible shows that it is God's wish to cure illnesses, so genetic engineering must be approved from God. And since I believe that our minds are independent from any god,

  1. "Only god has the right to interfere with our genes"

    Muslims also agree that only Allah (god) should have the right to manipulate our genes and characteristics because 'embryo research involves abortion'. This is because the Islamic faith is against abortion as life is seen as a gift from Allah (god).

  2. The incurable nature of Huntington's disease and current treatments.

    The possibilities of this method can therefore be applied to Huntington?s and an ongoing study to do with neural transplantation in HD patients [13] is producing similar results. An article published in The Open Neurology Journal in 2011, described Deep Brain Stimulation in Huntington?s disease: The Current Status by Dagmar

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work