• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Only God has the right to interfere with our genes' - Do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...


2) ' Only God has the right to interfere with our genes' - Do you agree with this statement? Our genes are the sequence of DNA or genetic codes that determine our characteristics. So by changing our genetics we must be effectively changing our characteristics and ultimately ourselves. Is this simply medical care that is no different from taking everyday medicine like antibiotics? Or are we inauspiciously playing God and immorally defying nature in order to safeguard our species? In my opinion scientific progress is enabling lives to be saved and a loving God would not condemn this. A religious person may look at different aspects of genetic engineering and thus hold a different view. Genetic engineering in humans is the development or manipulation of genes used to prevent disease and disabilities. Genetic diseases are serious and affect a vast number of people. Diseases or 'genetic disorders' like Huntington's, Sickle -cell anaemia, muscular dystrophy and cystic fibrosis can cause mental retardation, physical deformity or early death. Research into genes and genetic engineering can help prevent these problems and is surely ethical and not immoral. Most genetic research is based on germline therapy that enables genetic changes to the cells carrying the disorder from generation to generation. This means that permanent changes can be made in the person's genetic code that prevents the transmission of these cells. ...read more.


Religions recognise that in the modern world they must deal with issues like genetic engineering and amongst them there are different views of weather we, as humans, have the right to interfere with our own genes. Christianity is not harmogenous and so within it there are different attitudes towards genetic engineering. It is mainly the more liberal protestant Christians who think that genetic engineering is a good thing and see the positive aspects like the potential curing of disease and the negative, which would be the potential creation of artificially produced 'perfect humans'. There are religious reasons why these Christians support this scientific research and action. Jesus was a healer who showed that Christians should do what they can to heal and help healers and to cure disease. They believe that as humans we stewards on God's earth and by discovering the genetic make up of humans in order to help improve human life is fulfilling this stewardship. They believe that this is no different from researching medicine that can improve human life and reduce suffering. Regarding the potential of this technology getting out have hand, these Christians believe that creating cells is very different from creating people. Creating people via science rather than through sex would be wrong because as it would be taking over 'God's creator of life role', but creating cells is working with God. ...read more.


In the way that some Christians believe in stewardship, these Muslims believe that humans should work as vice-gerents in hiding and supporting lives. This no different from researching medicine that will help improve lives and reduce suffering. These Muslims also believe there is a difference between creating cells and creating people and that creating cells is working with God. They also consider that embryos can be used for research up until they are 14 days old, this is when the human life begins according to teachings of the Shari'ah. It is very difficult to foresee if the potential good of genetic engineering and 'interfering with genes' outweighs the potential bad and whether it is ethical in it's current state of research. I think that at the moment we have a very good idea of what the positive effects of 'interfering with our genes' would be. It could cure diseases and prevent them from being passed on to generation after generation. The negative effects are slightly unclear. Will we end up producing genetically modified "perfect humans" who are lacking in will and spirit through no fault of their own? Is producing humans without sex wrong even? Is it against the will of God? Personally I think that the these questions go unanswered by the critics of genetic engineering who do not have plausible enough arguments to stop the research into curing disease and saving human life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity essays

  1. The Biology of Autistic Spectrum Disorder and the Social Implications

    that the exact causes of ASD are still unknown, even though some research has shown that a faulty gene may be involved, which could have been inherited from one or both parents. ASD is also a condition that will continue throughout life, though there is some evidence to suggest that

  2. Genetic Engineering Should be Banned

    They are immune to diseases, and taste bitter to pests that may be roaming in the orchard. They are infused with nutrients they would never have produced on their own and seem strangely uniform in color, texture, and taste. Unfortunately, while appealing to the eye and tongue, these mutated "health" foods are hurting us whilst they help.

  1. Cloning - The assualt on the sanctity of life

    of a human being for exploitation, it is an infringement of basic human rights such as the right to life, the right to equality and a life free of discrimination. In truth all cloning is the same, regardless of whether the embryo is planted in the womb and born to

  2. Only God has the right to interfere in our genes

    It is no difference from researching into drugs which can be used to improve human life. There is a different between creating cells and creating people. Creating people by science rather than sex would be wrong. Because it would be taking over God's role in the creation of life, but creating cells is working with God.

  1. I disagree with the statement "Only God has the right to interfere with our ...

    Heal the sick who are there and tell them, "The kingdom of God is near you."' This quote from the bible shows that it is God's wish to cure illnesses, so genetic engineering must be approved from God. And since I believe that our minds are independent from any god,

  2. Defense in the blood

    Gene duplication is not a Darwinian explanation because duplication points only to common descent, not to the mechanism of evolution. c. What Would an Explanation Look Like? If homology is not sufficient to justify a Darwinian conclusion, what is? The required amount of justification depends on the complexity of the system under consideration.

  1. The incurable nature of Huntington's disease and current treatments.

    Their percentage improvement was based on their UHDRS-score (Unified Huntington?s Disease Rating Scale) before and after the surgery. The follow up period varied from 8 -48 months between patients. UHDRS gives a measurement of improvement for 5 symptoms of Huntington?s disease.

  2. Possible Cures For Migraines

    severe pain of migraine headaches, result from blood stagnation in the meridians.9 Acupuncture treatment can promote blood circulation, remove blood stagnation, and unblock meridians to relieve the symptoms. With increased cerebral circulation, the afflicted region obtains sufficient blood supply, oxygen and nutrition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work