• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Parachute Investigation

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Parachute Investigation

Aim

The aim of the experiment is to investigate how each of several different weights of varying mass attached to a parachute in turn can influence the gravitational pull and air resistance forces acting on it, consequently affecting the time it takes to reach the ground when dropped from a specific height.

Preliminary Work

Forces are measured in Newtons (N), named after Isaac Newton who invented this unit. We cannot see them but instead we can see their effects on objects, so forces are described in terms of what they do. They can cause objects to turn, change speed, direction or shape.

         The forces acting on a falling parachute are gravity and air resistance and these are the two forces which affect the speed at which the parachute falls.

Air resistance (also called drag) is when air molecules collide with an object’s leading surface. This is the opposite force to gravity, and can slow falling objects down.

The actual amount of air resistance encountered by the

object depends on a variety of factors. The two most common factors which have a direct effect upon the amount of air resistance are:

-        the speed of the object

-        the cross-sectional area of the object

Increased speeds and increased cross-sectional areas result in an increased amount of air resistance.

Gravity is what causes objects to fall downwards.

...read more.

Middle

                The weights that were used will also be used for the next experiment, as these were the ones available which weren’t too light and caused the parachute to drift and spin a lot, or too heavy and made the parachute crumple.

                Results will be recorded to 2 decimal places as this gives reasonable accuracy and allows comparison between results, but makes points relatively straightforward to plot on a graph.

Prediction

When dropped, each weight will initially cause the whole parachute to accelerate, and as it gains speed it encounters an increasing amount of opposing upward air resistance force.

The parachute will continue to gain speed until the air

resistance hitting its surface increases to a large enough value to balance the downward force of gravity. At this point, the net force is 0 Newtons, and the parachute stops accelerating. Then the parachute will have reached its terminal velocity and it will continue to fall at a constant speed until intercepted by a solid object, such as the ground.

Weights which have more mass experience a greater

downward force of gravity. They will have to accelerate for a longer period of time before there is sufficient upward air resistance to balance the large downward force of gravity.

So in conclusion, the heavier weights (56.8g, 71.0g) will

fall faster than the lighter weights (14.2g, 28.4g)

...read more.

Conclusion

         The test might also have been made fairer by dropping the parachute at exactly the same height each time, stopping the stopwatch at the exact moment it touched the ground and ensuring that the strings stayed untangled and therefore were the same length.  I considered using a different method of attaching the weights to the parachute because the weight of the plastic container might have affected the fall, but I decided to use it as it was the simplest way and didn’t weigh very much and also counted as part of the structure of the parachute anyway.

         I could also have only accepted results for which the parachute fell straight down and didn’t spin or float diagonally, but this proved to be too time-consuming as it seemed that the parachute tended to do what it wanted most of the time.

                If I were to extend the investigation further, I could do more investigations and vary different factors such as the room temperature, the string length or parachute size, how holes in the parachute affect results, and find different ways of improving results, for instance how to control the parachute and stop it spinning or drifting to the ground at an angle, and how to prevent the parachute from crumpling or the strings becoming tangled.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Mechanics & Radioactivity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Mechanics & Radioactivity essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Catapult Investigation

    3 star(s)

    The elastic band was then pulled back at a force of 5 Newton's. The elastic band was then pulled back at a force of 6 Newton's. The elastic band was then pulled back at a force of 7 Newton's. The elastic band was then pulled back at a force of 8 Newton's.

  2. Investigating the factors affecting tensile strength of human hair.

    It will not cause a massive variation in our conclusion. * All hair samples must be taken from 16-18 year old females. * 6 different samples must be taken for each colour of hair. * Make sure all equipment is set up; ensuring the strand of hair is fastened to the shown equipment correctly.

  1. Investigating the strength of a Supermarkets plastic bag.

    force, at this point the plastic is in a state of strain and can no longer straighten out. This is where the plastic begins to act as a plastic. If more force is applied the bonds will snap and the plastic strip will also snap.

  2. The aim of this investigation is to investigate the effect of adding varying weights ...

    To conclude my plan; these results lead me to believe that there was a relationship between the sag of the ruler and the force added to the end of it worth investigating and these results formed the basis of my investigation.

  1. Objectives: To determine the center of gravity of a body of irregular shapes

    to 3sig fig) Set 3: g = (4?2l) / T2 = (4?2* (0.61+0.15)) / 1.792 = 9.36 ms-2 (cor. to 3sig fig) Set 4: g = (4?2l) / T2 = (4?2* (0.565+0.15)) / 1.692 = 9.88 ms-2 (cor. to 3sig fig) Set 5: g = (4?2l) / T2 = (4?2* (0.53+0.15))

  2. Helicopter Investigation

    therefore making the plotted points decreasing as it goes along the 'x' and 'y' axis. I think that this graph prediction would go for both the average graph and the graphs for all 5 sets of results, which shall be already obtained by that time.

  1. Investigation into the factors that affect acceleration.

    0.1 =118 cm/s Time Taken = 12 x 0.1 seconds = 1.2 seconds Acceleration = (118 cm/s - 0 cm/s)

  2. Investigating how height affects time taken for a falling object to reach ground level.

    0.5 0.319 0.102 0.4 0.288 0.082 0.3 0.247 0.061 0.2 0.202 0.041 0.1 0.143 0.020 0.0 0.000 0.000 This is what the expected graph of Height vs. time should look like: Height (m) Time (secs) The following page shows what the expected graph for Height vs. time2 should look like.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work