• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Percent Yield Experiment. The limiting reagent for this experiment is strontium chloride hexahydrate. The two products will be strontium sulphate as a solid and copper (II) chloride in an aqueous state.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Percent Yield Lab By Sean Frank SCH3U - 11 University Chemistry Mr. Posteraro November 26th 2012 All Saints High School Hypothesis: The limiting reagent for this experiment is strontium chloride hexahydrate. The two products will be strontium sulphate as a solid and copper (II) chloride in an aqueous state. The predicted precipitate is strontium sulphate and the reaction should precipitate out approximatly 0.65 g of the substance. Materials: 1. 1 100 ml Wash Bottle 2. 2 50 ml Beakers 3. 1.00g Strontium Chloride hexahydrate 4. 1.00g Copper (II) Sulphate pentahydrate 5. 1 Glass Funnel 6. 1 Filter paper (type 2) 7. 1 250ml Erlenmeyer Flask 8. 100ml Water 9. 1 Digital Scale (precsision withtin a hundredth of a gram) 10. 1 Stirring Rod Apparatus: Procedure: 1. Fill the wash bottle with 100 ml of water 2. Using a digital scale, measure 1g of strontium chloride hexahydrate into a 50ml beaker. 3. Repeat step 2 with 1g of copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate 4. Using the control digital scale (teacher's scale), weigh the filter paper and record its weight. 5. Using the wash bottle, add enough water to the beaker containing the 1g of strontium chloride hexahydrate to completly dissolve the solid compound. Avoid adding any more than nessesary. ...read more.


Therefore there is 0.6888 grams of strontium sulphate Calculation 4: Percent Yeild Given: Mass of strontium sulphate precipitate 0.66 g Theoretical mass of strontium sulphate 0.6888 g Procedure: Yeild = (Experimental mass/theoretical mass) x 100 = 0.9582 x 100 = 95.82 % ? Therefore the percent yeild of strontium sulphate in this experiment is 95.82 % Calculation 3: Percent Error Given: Mass of strontium sulphate precipitate 0.66 g Theoretical mass of strontium sulphate 0.6888 g Procedure: Error = ((Theoretical yeild ? yeild) / theoretical yeild) x 100 = 0.0418 x 100 = 4.18 % ? Therefore the percent error of the strontium sulphate yeild in this experiment is 4.18 % Table 2: Theoretical calculations of the masses and moles of the reactants and products. SrCl2 - 6H20 Cu(II)SO4 - 5H20 SrSO4 Cu(II)Cl2 11H2O 1.00g 1.00g 0.6888g 0.5043g 0.7431g 266.58 g/mol 249.62 g/mol 183.64 g/mol 134.45 g/mol 18.01 g/mol 3.751x103- mol 4.006x103- mol 3.751x103- mol 3.751x103- mol 4.126x102- mol Analysis: 2. The percentage yeild in the experiment is 95.82 %, which is greater than the target yeild of 95 %. The following are possible factors that may contribute to acheiving a higher yeild. Firstly, it is possible that there was contamination from outside sources, such as lint or dust particles that could have fallen into the drying precipitate. ...read more.


First, the ammount of transfers were kept to a minimum in order to preserve as much of the orginal reactants as possible. Multiple transfers can cause reactants or precipitate to adhere to the walls of the beakers or the funnel. There are only two transfers present in this procedure. Second, the solutions were dissolved into aqeous solutions to facilitate a reaction and increase the ammount of reaction taking place. Without a solution, the two substances would not have reacted in a solid state. Solutions also increase the likeliness of the most possible reaction, because of its containment, as opposed to a gas, and the potion of the particles within, unlike a solid. Both reactants were dissolved into water in order to maximise the reaction and ensure it took place. The reaction was finally stirred for a mintute to maximise the reaction. The stirring added heat and motion, which is another form of heat, which allows more reactant to react properly. The heat increases the speed at which the particles move within the liquid, which leads to more collisions, and finally more reaction taking place. Finally, the original beakers and the funnel were washed down with water and passed through the filter to ensure all possible remaining reactant had been added to the apparatus. Refrences: 1. Nelson 11 Chemistry (2005) 2. http://ottawa.ca/en/env_water/water_sewer/water_wells/quality/facts/index.html 3. http://sargentwelch.com/pdf/msds/Strontium_Chloride_6-Hydrate_723.00.pdf 4. https://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9923597 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Inorganic Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Inorganic Chemistry essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Deducing the quantity of acid in a solution

    5 star(s)

    So then we could ensure that the maximum amount possible was transferred. Also, particles of the solid could have fallen on the top of the balance whilst transferring it to the weighting boat. If these particles are weighed, then the mass of sodium carbonate used would be different.

  2. effects Concentration and Temperature on the Rate of Reaction

    This shows that there is again a positive correlation between concentration and reaction rate, as when the concentration of potassium bromide is increased, the reaction rate increases. This means that the reaction, with respect to potassium bromide, is also first order.

  1. Bleaching experiment. Estimation of available chlorine in commercial bleaching solution.

    + 2S2O32-(aq) --> 2I-(aq) +S4O62-(aq)-------------------(3) (1) It is NOT necessary to measure the accurate amount of potassium iodide and ethanoic acid. Why? Both potassium iodide and ethanoic acid act as excess reagent, so that it is not necessary to know the accurate amount, what are the most concerned are that the accurate amount of the limiting reagents.

  2. Extraction of Chlorine

    [3]- http://www.cellchem.com/docs/products-services/chlorine caustic.htm, informative web-site; 27 February. [4]- Extract from: Redox reactions and electrode potentials, Chemical Ideas, Heinemann, page 208. [5]- http://electrochem.cwru.edu/ed/encycl/, electrochemistry encyclopaedia web-site; 28 February. ADVANCED SUBSIDIARY GCE CHEMISTRY (SALTERS) Skills for Chemistry: Open-Book Paper Primary pollutants are formed by oxidation under high temperatures in vehicle engines during

  1. Making Copper (II) Sulphate Stock Solution evaluation

    x 2 = 0.001 x 100 24.954g = 4 x 10-3 % % uncertainty of the 1dm3 flask = 0.8 x 100 1000 = 0.08 % Therefore the total uncertainty = 0.08 % + 4 x 10-3 % = 0.084 % So, to work out the percentage error I need

  2. The periodic table

    How foolish he would have seemed if these predictions had been incorrect but fortunately for him three of these missing elements were discovered by others within 15 years (ie within his lifetime). The first of these Mendeleev had called eka-aluminium because it was the one after aluminium (eka = 1 in Sanskrit)

  1. Plan to investigate the transition temperature of salt hydrates

    This is the intermolecular forces. The first force is the: 1. Instantaneous Dipole ? Induced Dipole. This force is due to the electrons orbiting different atoms are moving incredible fast, they are thought of as clouds of charge. At any instant moment, the electrons are more likely to be found in one region of space.

  2. The purpose of this experiment was to prepare a sample of Aspirin and measure ...

    and Calculations Results Mass of Salicylic acid 50.07g Actual Mass of Aspirin 82.81g Colour of precipitate formed White precipitate Melting point 119-122°c The formula equation for this reaction will be used to calculate the number of moles of Aspirin formed which will help calculate the percentage yield.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work