• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Persuade a creationist that the endosymbiont theory is correct.

Extracts from this document...


Persuade a creationist that the endosymbiont theory is correct. all life forms on Earth are made of cells. Eukaryotic cells have a cell nucleus separated from the rest of the cell contents (the cytoplasm) by a nuclear membrane. The nucleus contains DNA on chromosomes, whilst within the cytoplasm are distinct membrane-bounded organelles, which perform specific tasks. The more ancient prokaryotic cells on the other hand, (bacteria and Cyano-bacteria) carry their genetic material in simple strands of DNA that is not separated from the cytoplasm by a nuclear membrane. They reproduce asexually. Eukaryotic cells reproduce sexually, mixing genes between individuals and passing genetic variations to their offspring. Sexual reproduction allows more genetic combinations, so only not can eukaryotic cells be larger and more complex than prokaryotic cells, but also their ability for sexual reproduction made it more plausible for multi-cellular plants and animals to evolve. Eukaryotic cells are therefore the key to the evolution of the diversity of plant and animal life on our planet. The new techniques of functional genomics, now enabling the sequencing of the entire genomes of organisms. The new science, often automated, provides scientists with vast quantities of data. ...read more.


This idea was based on observations of cell structure, the biochemistry taking in the organelles and the fact that mitochondria and chloroplasts had unique genes that did not appear in the cell nucleus. It was an interesting theory that took over seven decades to become respectable. In the 1960's, the biologist Lynn Margulis put forward what was to become known as the Endosymbiont Hypothesis. In 1970 her book "Origin if Eukaryotic Cells" was published, followed by "Symbiosis in Cell Evolution" in 1981. Although now accepted as mainstream, the idea was treated with scepticism and even ridicule for several years, according to Professor John Allen: - "To a student in the 1960's and 1970's it was still a hypothesis. It was still a bit wacky, still on the fringe. People might want to talk about it over coffee, but you wouldn't set examination questions on it, because it wasn't real! It's mainstream stuff now. These things were once free-living bacteria. It's quite inconceivable that it could be otherwise. And it raises questions: what sort of bacteria and what evolutionary forces were at work? And why did they lose so many genes? ...read more.


During the history of plant cells, complex rearrangements of the genes responsible for photosynthetic machinery have taken place. These have included the loss and gain as well as the transfer of genetic material between the original endosymbionts Co-evolution took place of genes in the organelles and in the nucleus. As a result, genes and intracellular signalling are very specific, tailored to each individual partnership. Consequently, organelle changes between even closely related species can result in disturbance of the intra cellular genetic balance because of incompatibility. Throughout the evolution of plastids, genes were transferred to the nucleus of the host cell with major consequences for the regulation of gene expression. Although the genes themselves have been lost to the nucleus, the plastid retains a role in the manufacturing of proteins necessary for photosynthesis, the plastids and the nucleus is involved in regulating the expression a set of nuclear genes that encode proteins required for photosynthesis and related processes. Two and a half billion years of co-existence and co-evolution are summed up by a theory known as endosymbiosis. It explains the origin of organelles seen inside eukaryotic cells, notably mitochondria and chloroplasts. In a nutshell, the endosymbiotic theory is that mitochondria evolved from bacteria living within their host cell. Chloroplasts evolved from endosymbiotic cyanobacteria; that is from prokaryotic organisms able to synthesise organic constituents from inorganic sources. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    An Investigation into the Mitotic Nuclear Division of Allium Sativum Root Tip Cells, and ...

    5 star(s)

    in each, even when accounting for the cytological differences between the cells (for example, the allium cells are plant-like in nature and will lack the centrioles present in the embryonic animal cells). A major similarity between the cells in question is the r�le and biological significance of the cells in

  2. Recombinant DNA, genetically engineered DNA prepared in vitro by cutting up DNA molecules and ...

    prize for physiology or medicine for determining the structure of the DNA molecule, many scientists believed that Franklin should have been honored with them. Born in London on July 25, 1920, Rosalind Elsie Franklin won a scholarship to Newnham College, Cambridge.

  1. Free essay

    Outline the impact on the evolution of plants and animals of: ...

    * Chromosomes always come in pairs, one from the mother (maternal) and one from the father (paternal). * The pair of chromosomes are called Homologous chromosomes. * A gene is a unit of inheritance, a sequence of DNA. * An allele is an expression of a particular gene, e.g.


    Bacterium was able to grow due to pglo resistance to ampicillin. Glow occurred dude to Arabinose (sugar) switching the green Florissant protein on (Pglo contains GFP: green fluorescent protein). Errors or improvement to experiment Possible errors were that, during my experiment I left the dish slightly open when I was

  1. HSC maintaining a balance notes

    For F2 he expected 3:1 ratio of r:w but all females had red eyes and so did 50% of males. He suggested the gene for eye colour is located on X and there is no corresponding gene on Y; therefore sex-linked.

  2. Investigating what effect varying the concentration of copper sulphate has on the enzyme Catalase ...

    The same goes for the amount of substrate; increasing the substrate will increase the rate of reaction but only till the point where the substrate has enzyme molecules to bind to. This point is called the saturation point meaning the enzyme is not in plentiful enough supply for the substrate to bind to.

  1. Management style, culture & organizational structure.

    the advantage that only the part between the primer sequences is replicated. The DNA must be cooled to 40�C to allow the primers to anneal to their complementary sequences on the separated DNA strands. 4. The DNA polymerase enzyme can now extend the primers and complete the replication of the rest of the DNA.

  2. Manipulating Reproduction - Have we gone too far?

    One of two techniques are then applied to the biopsy cells-fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) for chromosome disorders or - polymerise chain reaction (PCR) for single gene defects, such as Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). Embryos, which do not carry the genetic disorder, can then be transferred to the uterus in the hope that a normal pregnancy will develop (1)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work