• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Physics coursework: Trolley experiment

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Physics coursework: Trolley experiment Aim: The aim of this experiment is to find out whether or not the mass of a trolley effects its acceleration when traveling down a ramp kept at a fixed height. Planning Set up the experiment as shown above. Run the cart down the ramp once to make sure the cart runs in a straight line. Start the cart with its front wheels behind the starting line each time. The run finishes when the back wheels cross the finishing line. Three runs will be taken for each weight and three runs will be taken without a weight. We decided to take seven different observations, increasing the weight by 0.8kg each time Apparatus needed: 0.8kg weights (8)to add on to the cart) Ramp (1.5m in length) Cart (same cart used all the time) Books (to hold up the ramp at a fixed height) Stop watch (for timing the experiment) Sand bags (to stop the car at the end of each run) Safety: To keep this experiment safe, different precautions have to be taken. * Sand bags will be used to prevent the cart falling of the table * The ramp will be kept at a sensible height (17.5cm) ...read more.

Middle

And whether or not they are balanced. I predict hat the acceleration of the cart will be constant, as the forces are always unbalanced, but because of the different mass for each observation, the forces will always be different. Obtaining evidence The results shown below are the results for the 7 observations for the cart Weight of cart (kg) Time for 1st run (sec) Time for 2nd run (sec) Time for 3rd run (sec) Average time (sec) 0kg added 2.52 2.53 2.53 2.52 0.8kgs added 2.44 2.44 2.44 2.44 1.6kgs added 2.4 2.42 2.4 2.40 2.4kgs added 2.4 2.44 2.41 2.41 3.2kgs added 2.41 2.46 2.45 2.44 4kgs added 2.47 2.49 2.47 2.47 4.8kgs added 2.53 2.51 2.53 2.52 Each run was 1.5m in distance; the same cart was used and started from the same place, and finished in the same place. I worked out the average by adding the 1st, 2nd and 3rd run times, and then dividing the answer by 3. Here is a table to show the average speed for each weight added onto the cart: Weight on top of cart (kg) Average speed (m/s) 0 0.59 0.8 0.61 1.6 0.62 2.4 0.62 3.2 0.61 4 0.60 4.8 0.59 Calculations Here are the calculations I did to find out the average speed for each weight: 1) ...read more.

Conclusion

If the ramp were longer, the cart would have taken more time to complete one run. The observations did back up my prediction, and did back-up my prediction to a certain extent, but at The method we used gave accurate results. Even though the results were accurate, different factors could have still affected the speed, like whether or not the cart ran down the ramp in a straight line, or if the cart hit the sides If I had to do the experiment again I would use wider ramp so that there is chance of the cart hitting the sides of the ramp. The factor that would have probably had the biggest effect on the speed and time would have to be the stopwatch. It was extremely hard to stop the watch at precisely the right time, as it was hard to see when the back wheels crossed the finishing line. That would mean that the experiment is not 100%accurate, but that was one of the things our group found hard to control. To go on a step further in the experiment, I propose that we do exactly the same experiment, but also do 7 observations with the ramp at a different height, to see if the force that does slow the cart down can be determined. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Mechanics & Radioactivity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Mechanics & Radioactivity essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    AS OCR B Advancing Physics Coursework - Making Sense of Data

    4 star(s)

    (4.41 - 2.26) / (0.43 - 0.24) = 11.32 m s-2 (4.2 - 2.3) / (0.43 - 0.24) = 10 m s-2 11.32 - 10 = acceleration due to gravity �1.32m s-2. = 10.5 �1.32m s-2. The same principal was applied to the distance - time2 graph.

  2. Flywheel experiment

    can be categorize into two sub-groups called "Measurement errors" and "Procedural errors". Measurement Errors. * Errors may perhaps have crept up while measuring the distances of H1 and H2. These distances could have possibly been marked incorrect if the points were not marked at eye level, which could have lead to errors in the final value.

  1. Investigating the factors affecting tensile strength of human hair.

    This could have increased or decreased the bond attractions in the hair to cause the hair to have a high or low tensile stress. This would make my results unreliable. The hairs showing higher tensile stress may just be showing how sticky the selotape is and how strongly it is holding the hair structure together.

  2. Investigating Force, Mass and Acceleration using a Trolley

    will increase the acceleration of the trolley. III) The light gate used in the experiment might carry out small errors. The sensitivity of the light sensor and the width of the hole for light to enter the light gate might vary the length of cardboard that it is measuring from + or - the radius of the hole.

  1. Force of Friction experiment

    / N 1.86 3.73 5.59 The coeffiient of friction of the wooden blocks on various materials are summarized as follow: wooden plank plastic plate brick 0.57 0.43 1.2* 0.27 0.21 0.6 * It is abnormal for the coefficient greater than 1. Refer to the Discussion on page 7.

  2. OCR B Advancing Physics Physics Practical Investigation Coursework Investigating Simple Harmonic Oscillations

    a little unreliable, so error bars on the first graph are small. The errors are larger for the amplitude measurements - simply because the system had so much energy that the maximum vertical displacement was difficult to measure before it started swinging.

  1. Centripetal motion. The objective of this experiment is to verify whether the tension ...

    0.273 0.278 0.286 0.286 0.298 0.306 0.303 0.302 0.302 0.314 0.333 0.347 0.331 0.331 0.362 0.358 0.362 0.361 0.361 Sources of error 1. As there was air resistance present to oppose the swirling motion of the rubber bung, this lowers the accuracy of the experiment.

  2. The Physics of an Atomic Bomb

    the fissionable material in a subcritical state before detonation; Bringing the fissionable material into a supercritical mass while keeping it free of neutrons; Introducing neutrons into the critical mass when it is at the optimum configuration (i.e. at maximum super criticality); Keeping the mass together until a substantial portion of the material has fissioned.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work