• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Physics - The aim of this practical investigation was to obtain a value for the spring constant k for a decided system of springs.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

PH6 - Physics Coursework

## Aim

The aim of this practical investigation was to obtain a value for the spring constant k for a decided system of springs.

### Summary

3. #### Resonance of the spring system -

The two k values were then compared and analysed to see which method gives the better value. The two values were 8.09Nm-1 and 7.57 Nm-1.

Hooke’s Law

#### Theory

Using the equation F = kx

where F = the force exerted on the spring by the mass in Newtons (N)

k = the spring constant in Newtons per millimeter (Nmm-1) and,              x = the extension observed in millimeters (mm)

I will plot an F-x graph from which I will obtain a gradient and y-intercept which I can use to compare the above equation to the straight line equation y = mx + c where mx = gradient and, c = y-intercept

So,        y = mx + c

F = k   + x

Middle

#### 89.5 + 222.0 + 367.0 + 496.0 + 622.0 + 749.0 + 878.0 + 1008.0 = 553.93

8

So, the Centroid value for the x-axis is 553.93. This is plotted with the mean value for the y-axis and together they make our centroid.

Graph and Calculations

The graph that was drawn from the results was made up of two lines for maximum and minimum slope values which both had to pass through the error boxes and centroid. From the graph I took two gradients for each line and calculated an average gradient for each for accuracy. These gradients worked out to be.

k  = ∆F/∆x

k1 = 2.87 / 0.35 = 8.19

k2 = 2.37 / 0.29 = 8.16

kmax mean = 8.19 + 8.16 = 8.18

2

k  = ∆F/∆x

k1 = 2.30 / 0.33 = 6.97

k2 = 2.50 / 0.36 = 6.94

kmin mean = 6.97 + 6.94 = 6.96

2

kmean = 8.18 + 6.96 = 7.57 Nm-1

2

Oscillating Mass

Theory

Using the equation T = 2π√(m/k)

Where, T = the period (time taken for one complete oscillation) of the eeeeeeeeeeeespring in seconds (s)

m = mass used in kilograms (kg) and,

k = the spring constant in kilograms per second squared (kgs-2)

Rearranging the equation by squaring it we can form

T2 = 2m

k

I will plot an T2-m

Conclusion

Force calculations. Further repeat readings could have been made to increase both reliability and bring the mean closer to the actual value. Also, a more accurate textbook g value could have been used to improve Force calculations

Experiment 2

As in the graph for Experiment 1 but more so the maximum and minimum gradients bisects the axis equidistantly either side of the origin (0,0). Therefore, this graph demonstrates the direct proportionality between T2 and Mass. The smaller masses were more difficult to time as they did not settle into a rhythm as easily as larger masses and oscillated faster. This increased human error and, therefore, overall % error in the timing and, ultimately, T2.

The k value obtained was 8.09Nm-1 ± 0.0Nm-1. And the % error works out as 0.0 %

Once again, I could have weighed the masses on a balance instead of relying on the quoted values. This would have increased the accuracy of my masses as the error gets bigger as mass increases. Timing accuracy could have been improved by using a more accurate timing device. A system of computer linked light gates could have been used to eliminate human error in measuring rate of oscillation. As with Experiment 1 repeat readings would both increase reliability of readings and mean value.

Comparison

Richard Thomas 13A

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Waves & Cosmology section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Waves & Cosmology essays

1.  ## Wave Coursework

3 star(s)

� 2 0.5 0.242 0.229 0.007 1.0 0.381 0.362 0.009 1.5 0.437 0.420 0.009 2.0 0.493 0.476 0.009 2.5 0.542 0.530 0.006 3.0 0.586 0.556 0.015 3.5 0.625 0.608 0.008 4.0 0.645 0.633 0.006 * data is an outlier/anomalous compared to the others but will still be included, hoping it does not have much affect.

2. ## Simple Harmonic Motion of a mass-spring system.

As a result, the x-intercept gives the value of the effective mass of the spring. It is necessary to point out there is limitation of the conclusion since the measurement was carried out for mass in the range from 0.02kg to 0.24kg only.

1. ## An investigation into the time period of a mass-spring oscillating system.

It shows that the results of the time periods squared all lie extremely close to the line of best fit, showing that there is a direct link between mass and time period in this graph of y=Vx. We have learnt that the elastic energy in a spring increases as it becomes more taught.

2. ## Determine the value of 'g', where 'g' is the acceleration due to gravity.

This is due to the fact that the spring itself is undergoing simple harmonic motion and due to this we need to consider the mass of the spring. In the derivation above the mass of the spring is being neglected.

1. ## Finding the Spring Constant (k) and Gravity (g) using Hooke&amp;amp;#146;s Law and the Laws ...

Extension (m) Period (s) 11. You now need to average out the results. Start with the mass - take all of the results 0.050 ? m ? 0.149, add them together and divide by the number of masses (should be 3), record this in a new table like the one below.

2. ## The aim of this investigation is to examine the effect on the spring constant ...

The force required to stretch the material during this period is less per unit of stretch than before as the molecular bonds holding the material together have been weakened. The point d on this graph is the breaking point of the spring, often referred to as the Ultimate Tensile Stress (u.t.s.).

1. ## Investigation on how putting springs in series and parallel affects their extension.

By doing this I found the spring constant of the two springs in parallel to be 5.71 x10-2 (3s.f.), the spring constant of the single spring to be 2.30 x10-2 (3s.f) and the spring constant of the two springs in series to be 1.14 x10-2 (3s.f).

2. ## Investigating elastic bands in comparison with springs.

I will also make sure I measure from the same place each time. I will repeat the experiment so that I can take an average of the results and obtain a more accurate result. Here is a diagram showing how the equipment listed above will be set out: Observations Here • Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to 