• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Preparation and analysis of a complex metal salt

Extracts from this document...


Experiment 7 Preparation and analysis of a complex metal salt (15-12-2006) Objective 1. To prepare a sample of copper-ammonia complex salt. 2. To determine the ammonia content in the sample of salt. 3. To determine the metal content of the sample of salt. Results A. Determination of ammonium content HCl was added in excess into the complex salt. The NH3 ligands were protonated to NH4+ and were detached from the metal cation. The volume of HCl in excess was determined by titration using NaOH. The ammonium content of the salt was determined. * Weight of the complex salt used: (6.321 - 5.896) = 0.425g * Volume of HCl (0.6M) added onto the flask: 25cm3 No. of moles of HCl added: 25/1000 x 0.6 = 0.015 moles * The reaction of the titration is given by the following chemical equation: HCl + NaOH --> NaCl + H2O (1) Volume of NaOH (0.5M) used in the titration: 20.8 - 4.3 = 16.5 cm3 (2) No. of moles of NaOH used: 16.5 / 1000 x 0.5 = 8.25 x 10-3 moles (3) No. of moles of HCl in excess = No. of moles of NaOH used in titration = 8.25 x 10-3 moles * No. ...read more.


So, the no. of moles of SO42- in the sample of salt is 1.74 x 10-3 mole * Molar mass of SO42- : 32.1 + 16 x 4 = 96.1 g/mole * Mass of SO42- in the sample = 96.1 x 1.74 x 10-3 = 0.167 g. * % by mass of SO42- in the sample = 0.167 / 0.434 x 100% = 38.5% * The metal cation, anion and ligand account for (38.5 + 25.5 + 27.0) = 91% of the weight of the salt. So, the salt consists of 9% of water. C. Determination of the chemical formula of the complex salt * % by mass of NH3 in the sample was 27.0%. * % by mass of Cu2+ in the sample was 25.5% * Assuming 100g of the salt, the no. of moles of NH3 and Cu2+ are (27 / 17) = 1.59 mole and (25.5 /63.5) = 0.40 mole respectively. * The molar ratio of NH3 to Cu2+ is (1.59 / 0.40) = 3.97, which is similar to the theoretical ratio of 4:1. * % by mass of water was 9%. Assuming 100g of the salt, there are 9 g of water in the salt sample. ...read more.


But if there is an excess amount of HCl present, it would be ensured that all the ligands are detached from the metal ion and have reacted with HCl. 2. In the preparation of the complex salt, 95% ethanol was added into the solution. Since the complex salt is less soluble in ethanol then in water, adding ethanol into the flask would make the salt precipitate. 3. After some calculations, it was found that there was 5% of water in the sample of salt. The water comes from 2 sources. First, the water molecules may form the ligands in the complex, as suggested by the chemical formula [Cu(NH3)4(H2O)1.25]SO4. Second, the solution, while being precipitated, may be crystallized and forms water of crystallization. 4. In part B of the experiment, the procedures in part A was repeated but no indicators were added. This is because the indicators would affect the color of the solution, which would in turn affect the color change during the EDTA titration. Thus, no indicator was added. 5. It was found that the ratio of water to Cu in the complex is not an integer. This may be due to the assumption that 'all the weight of the salt, apart from Cu2+, NH3 and SO42-, would be water' being wrong. There may be other substances in the complex salt. The other explanation is that the arrangement of the complex is irregular. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Inorganic Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Inorganic Chemistry essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Determining the concentration of acid in a given solution

    5 star(s)

    alkali and I would think that the acid was of a higher concentration than it actually was so the titres would not be accurate. If I read the meniscus slightly below the calibration line in the volumetric flask then the concentration of sodium carbonate used would be slightly higher that I would think.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Deducing the quantity of acid in a solution

    5 star(s)

    Having the equipment contaminated can cause inaccuracies in both making the solution and titration because: - Could react with the compounds and ruin the experiment - Could alter the colour of the solution and therefore, alter the endpoint - Could more importantly reduce the concentration All this could affect our results, both numerically and experimentally.

  1. effects Concentration and Temperature on the Rate of Reaction

    line, thus enabling me to work out an accurate value for the activation enthalpy. I could not easily draw the triangle on the line of best fit, which allows me to calculate the gradient, using a computer. Graph 7 shows that there is a negative correlation between the two sets

  2. Lab report Determination of Enthalpy Change of Neutralization

    * 840) * 30.0 = 6419.260504 J H2SO4 (aq) + 2NaOH (aq) � Na2SO4 (aq) + 2H2O (l) No of mole of NaOH = 4 * 0.025 = 0.1 mol According to the equation, 1 mole of H2SO4 reacts with 2 mole of NaOH to form 2 mole of H2O.

  1. Determination of Total Hardness in Water by EDTA Titration

    of mole of EDTA used = 0.00512M x 0.01993 = 0.000102 mole From the equation, mole ratio of EDTA: M2+ = 1:1 The no. of mole of M2+ ions in 25ml of a unknown sample = 0.000102 mole The molar mass of EDTA (i.e.

  2. an experiement to test for anions and cations

    When testing for anions, "substance J" was identified as a sulphate (SO42-). The observations recorded were a white precipitate that was not able to dissolve in dilute hydrochloric acid. "Substance I" was identified as a nitrate (NO3). The observation recorded was a brown ring had formed between the two liquids.

  1. Determination of Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) of a Given Sample of Waste Water

    * Discussions How did the reaction take place? For the observation of colour change during titration, the colour change should be as the following: Orange yellow--> blue green --> reddish brown End- point Fe3+ Fe2+ The colour change arose from the oxidation state of the iron complex.

  2. Oxidation of ethanol

    * 2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazine - is potentially explosive when dry and may decompose rapidly or explosively if heated or subject to shock. It is also very flammable. For personal protection I wore safety glasses. * Sulfuric Acid - The substance is a strong oxidant and reacts violently with combustible and reducing materials.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work