• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

Prove or conversely disprove the inverse square law.

Extracts from this document...


Adam Hodgkinson


My aim of this experiment is to prove or conversely disprove the inverse square law, which simply states that the intensity of any point source, which spreads its influence equally in all directions without a limit to its range, will decrease in intensity inversely proportional to the square of the distance.

Background information


As first proposed by Isaac Newton when proposing his universal law of gravitation it became clear to him that the intensity of gravity would decrease according to the inverse of the square of the distance.  This is the heart of the inverse square, which states for any point source, which spreads its influence equally in all directions without a limit to its range, will obey the inverse square law.    Quite simply the inverse square law states that for sources emitted from a point the intensity will be deduced as the inverse of the square of the distance.     You double the distance you reduce the intensity by a factor of ¼.    This has applications in electric fields, light, sound, gamma radiation, and gravity.    All of these are expressed in the medium of a field.     To explain the properties involved in a field it is useful to use the idea of flux.    When water flows form a ‘source’ to a sink it is transferred at a certain rate, or flux.   The flux density will be the mass of water per second crossing a unit area perpendicular to the flow.   We can think of energy density in a similar way.     Energy flux density is normally referred to as intensity.    Field strength and energy flux density are related.    The strength of a field will fall off proportionally.

...read more.


Also what must be decided is the range of distances I will work across and the increments by which I will increase my distance.    I feel the best distance to measure across will be from zero distance, through to 15 cms.    And I also feel it is advisable to increase in stages of 5mm.   I believe if we plot distance against 1/√c then a straight line will be described, so a sufficient number of results are necessary to accurately plot this.

Light experiment

Practical issues

The practical issues at hand here, are far less complicated than that of the Gamma radiation experiment.    We have a limited amount of resources available.

I could have constructed an LDR circuit attached to a ohm meter, this would gage the changing resistance of the circuit as the light source is moved away.   However this is impractical, and although would prove an inverses square relationship it doesn’t deal in the basic units.    In order to get a direct reading of the changing lux readings it would be sensible to use a light sensor and a  large analogue meter meter.    I will use a Griffin and George ray box with 12v bulb as the source of light.      The only real decision to be made here is what form of measurement device is to be used to measure the distance of the source for the dector.     I have decided to measure roughly over 25 cm, this means I simply cannot use either the digital, or sight-read vernier callipers, as they have a range only up to 15 cm.    So I must use a metre rule.


The experiment is very similar to the Gamma experiment, in that you are moving a point source away from a dector at steady intervals.

...read more.


20 = 8 X 100 = 800%


This is obviously an unacceptable level of error, however is not as bad as it sounds as it is a systematic error so will affect each result the same amount, so relative to each other the results will not be perverse.   The only difference it will make will be to the gradient of a line.    I feel that it is responsible for the fact that in my logarithm graph the gradient is -0.86 rather than 2.   The other people doing the same experiment also got a gradient of around –0.8 so I feel my reasoning here is justified.  

But this is the glaring error, and should I do the experiment I would either try to have direct measurement from actual source to actual dector to eliminate this error.   Or find out the value of the error and add it to the measured distance, in a similar way we work out the background radiation count, and then subtract it from our radiation count.

In conclusion it is hard to give an overall percentage error in my result.  This is because as the distance of the source from the dector changes, so does the relevance of the error.   As distance increases any inaccuracy in measurement decreases.  However I will give a total percentage error at the distance of 10mm.

Error of measurement +- 0.5mm –  +- 5%  

Error due to timing +- 0.8 seconds –  +-1.3%

Error due to unknown position of source and dector 20mm – 200%

So the total error would be 206.3%

However I will choose to ignore the last one, because unlike the others it is not plus or minus, it is constant at present in all results so the final percentage error is;

+- 6.3%

In conclusion I feel I have proved that both gamma and Light radiation Obey the inverse square law, I feel this is sufficient data to say that all members of the electro-magnetic spectrum obey the inverse square law.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern Physics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern Physics essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Albert Einstein - The father of modern physics

    4 star(s)

    So now try to image the effects of time dilation and length contraction of light entering a black hole, that?s like both theories together, the effects would be huge, but also impossible for us to measure, as we couldn?t get close enough without being destroyed.

  2. An Investigation into Gamma Rays and the Inverse Square Law.

    * The inverse square law is a principle that expresses the way radiant energy propagates through space. The rule states that the power intensity per unit area from a point source, if the rays strike the surface at right angle, varies inversely according to the square of the distance from the source.

  1. The Life and Influences of Albert Einstein

    Even though, Einstein agreed with Planck, he did surpass him in the end because he "was suggesting not only that energy is emitted and absorbed in tiny bundles, but that the light waves themselves are made up of energy bundles" (Goldberg p.39).

  2. Free essay

    The development of the modern concept of the atom, the size and nature of ...

    This was something measurable, making Dalton's the first quantitative atomic theory ever advanced. Chemists had long puzzled over why a substance such as copper carbonate, however prepared, always contained the same proportions by weight of copper (five parts), oxygen (four parts), and carbon (one part).

  1. Modern Physics - AQA GCE Physics B - Revision Notes

    * Loudness can be measured in decibel (dB) scale; the threshold of frequency is assigned a sound level of 0 dB. A 3 decibel decrease would half its amplitude. * Intensity is an objective quantity that can be measured but loudness depends upon the ear of the listener and is therefore subjective.

  2. Physics of the Impossible - building a light sabre.

    and a separate device to form a magnetic field to the specific height you want the 'saber' to be. To prevent the magnetic field from expanding beyond the handle, there is a material that it used to constrain magnetic fields - this would be used to form the shape.

  1. Physics Course work 'What is the Higgs Boson'

    these particles which depending on how much the new particle react with the elementary particles, will affects the amount of mass each particle has. The discovery of this ?extra particle? explained that because Photon and Gluon does not react with this particle, it will not pick up any mass, which

  2. Why We Still Need the Space Programme

    People feel as if the space program takes a lot of money to support and that the budget should be cut. The space program was originally started during the cold war so that the United States could keep up with the Soviets.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work