• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Proving the lens formula.

Extracts from this document...


Jack Webdale        02/05/2007     Page

Proving the lens formula

Background information

When light passes from air to a denser material it slows down. In a concave lens the light has to travel further through the middle then through the sides. This has the affect of pushing the waves back in the middle and forward around the edge therefore effectively adding curvature to the wave. A similar thing happens when passing through a concave lens but obviously vice-versa, taking away curvature of the wave.

The curvature that the lens adds or takes away is the Power of the lens, measured in dioptres. P=1/f, P is the power of the lens and f is the focal length. The focal length of a lens is the distance from a lens to its focal point, which is where the image of a distant object is formed. The shorter the focal length the more powerful the lens.

The following formula is what I am going to attempt to prove that it is valid. It is used to give the focal length, and hence where the image is focused.


Where v is the distance from the lens to its focal point, u is the distance from the object to the lens and 1/f is the power of the lens. This follows from the above, the power shows how much curvature is added to the wave. As a wave moves further away from an object the curvature of it decreases.

This formula may also help me with my progress, as I can use it to calculate the magnification of the lens.

...read more.



Before I begin the real experiment, I have chosen to perform a preliminary experiment to discover a suitable range of distances I will get results from. I will also have an idea of the power of the lens, so I can judge it’s minimum and maximum distances to get a clear image on the sheet. To do this I will set-up the apparatus as shown in the diagram of apparatus, And I have chosen to make the Object and the lamp a constant position, due to the wires etc and difficulty of shifting it about all the time. Therefore, the Lens and the image sheet are the elements that I will move to focus the image.

Preliminary research

I began with a crude test, to get an approximate result for the focal length of the lens. I simply got a piece of paper, put it against a ruler, and with the lens; I placed it in front of a window, and focussed the image on the paper. I then had a measurement of approximately 15 cm. This would help me greatly in my experiment, as it would indicate immediately any results way off the mark, considering the variables and errors. I then also set up the apparatus as shown in the diagram, and used them to determine what distances I would use in my experiment. I placed a metre rule on the bench, and put on one end, the screen that the image would focus, and at the other, the object. I decided that I would not exceed this Object to Image (U – V)

...read more.


1/v = (-1)1/u+1/f. From this statement the gradient of the line is always –1, and this is always the case whatever the reciprocal of the focal length. Also, due to the –1 gradient, the X-axis intercept is also the reciprocal of the focal length. With the graph, I can determine the experiment was successful, as the straight line travels through both axis and at almost the same points. On the Y-Axis 1.167cm and on the X-axis 0.066cm. They both give a focal length of approximately 14.9cm

Knowing that the focal length is approximately 15cm, I can conclude that my experiment was successful, and thus proves that the lens formula 1/U + 1/V = 1/F is valid.

I decided not to put error bars on my graph, as I was not using the whole values of v and u, where I knew the errors spread over a 0.5cm distance for each measurement taken. However, even though I took middle values of v, it is still evident that errors took place. If I were to repeat the experiment, I would choose to take two values of u, the object distance as well as v then take the middle value. This may also reduce the chance of inaccuracy due to the human eye. There are little ways in which I could improve this experiment, except take many readings of a result, then take an average value. Doing this for every measurement taken, however, would be very time consuming, and if one reading happened to be far out, the average would not be that accurate.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Physics coursework; Finding the focal length of a lens using a graphical method.

    4 star(s)

    * Yet another possible way of making focusing the image easier is using a more complicated object/image, therefore further increasing the accuracy. Error Potential: Something which must be considered in my experiment is the potential for error I discussed after table 1, if u has an accuracy of +1mm and

  2. To investigate the relationship between the distance between a lens and an object, and ...

    I will be using a 10cm lens in my investigation, as it is one I have readily available and the focal length is not of importance so long as it remains constant. As a preliminary experiment, I checked the length of my lens using the method described above and found it to be 10cm.

  1. In this experiment I will be investigating the efficiency of a motor. I hope ...

    Evaluation: My experiment went reasonably well, I repeated my results three times this increased the amount of accuracy in the experiment, it helped divide error in time by three. I followed my plan making sure of safety and went through my method before conducting the experiment.

  2. To investigate the relationship between u and v for a convex lens.

    times greater than the focal length of the lens, the image will be diminished. The value for v will be greater than the focal length of the lens, but not greater than two times the focal length of the lens.

  1. Investigating the Positioning of Real Images formed by a Convex Lens.

    The problem therefore involves three variables (v, u and f). V is the dependable variable, which makes v the function of u and f. In turn f depends on the shape of the lens, and what the lens is made of.

  2. Does the focal length of a lens depend on the colour of light used?

    The only variable will be object distances and the type o filter. I will be doing repeats so that my results become more reliable, and therefore ensure a more accurate conclusion and a higher likelihood of success in completing my aim.

  1. Finding the Focal Length of a Lens.

    This can be shown if we simplify the shape of the lens used in the experiments. (4) (NOTE: Diagram not necessarily to scale) To begin with, the angle of incidence is the same with both rays. However the different light rays are refracted at different magnitudes and so the refractive index must be different for the two rays.

  2. Measuring the focal length of a lens for red and green light- Case Study

    The refractive index of a lens is a way to measure how much the light slows down when it enters the lens. The refractive index is highly dependent upon the wavelength of the different coloured lights. The lower the wavelength the higher the refractive index, the higher the wavelength the lower the refractive index.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work