Temperature
Temperature can alter the rate of reaction because enzymes work best at 40°C and if the temperature is lower then the molecules will move slower and therefore there will be less collisions of enzymes with substrates and the rate of reaction will be slower. If the temperature is higher than 40°C then the enzymes may become denatured and they will not work properly, slowing down the rate of reaction or if the temperature is high enough to denature every enzyme, no reaction will occur.
Concentration
There are two ways that concentration can affect the rate of reaction, these are concentration of substrate and concentration of enzymes. The concentration of substrate can alter the rate of reaction because if it is higher then there will be more frequent collisions with enzymes and therefore a higher rate of reaction. If the concentration of the substrate is lower then collisions of enzymes and substrates will be less frequent and the rate of reaction will be slower.
The concentration of enzymes affects the rate of reaction in a similar way because if there is a lower concentration of enzymes then there will be less frequent collisions and the rate of reaction will be slower. If there is a higher concentration of enzymes then there will be more frequent collisions and therefore a faster rate of reaction.
Inhibitors
These are a sort of poison that can be added to an enzyme and will block off the enzyme so that no substrate can enter the enzyme. Therefore the substrate can no longer react with the enzyme so this will certainly slow down the rate of reaction.
Conditions in Which Trypsin works.
*Works in an alkaline environment.
*Produced in the Pancreas.
*pH level in the pancreas: 6.9
*Temperature in the Pancreas: 40.9 C
Investigation.
Aim
To discover how atmospheric temperature affects the rate of digestion using the enzyme Trypsin. Photographic film has a substance called Acetate at the bottom and on, Gelatine. Gelatine has silver salts in it. When Trypsin is added, the Gelatine is broken down and the Acetate becomes clear. This can occur at different speeds depending upon the factors acting on the Trypsin. In this investigation I have chosen to explain that of the affect of temperature.
List of equipment
*Photographic film.
*24 Test Tubes (8 different temperatures; Tested 3 times.)
*8 water Baths set up at the temperatures: 20o C, 25o C, 30o C, 35o C, 40o C, 45o C, 50o C, 55o C.
*8 stopwatches (one for each water bath.)
*8 Thermometers (one for each water bath.)
Measurements.
*7cml of the enzyme Trypsin for each testube.
* cm of photographic film for each test.
Safe test
As well as the experiment needing to be a fair test, it must also be a safe test for it to be successful. I must make sure that safety goggles are worn at all times in the experiment as Trypsin would be very damaging if it got into the eye as it breaks down protein and most of the eye is made of protein.
Fair test
The experiment must be a fair test or I will be getting a lot of anomalous results and there may not be a clear pattern in the results. To make the experiment a fair test I am going to make sure that volumes of Trypsin are the same in each experiment and the size of the photographic film is the same.
I will also need to make sure that the photographic film is completely clear before I stop the timer. When I think it is clear I will press the red button on the timer and if the film goes no clearer I will take the time that I paused the timer at. If it does go clearer I will continue the timer and stop it when it goes clearer.
The variable I am going to change:
I shall be changing the temperature as I test the rate in which the Trypsin takes to digest the Gelatine covering the photographic film.
The variable that will change:
The colour of the film and the time it takes to clear in different temperatures. Also the rate that the Trypsin digests at different temperatures.
Other factors to watch out for:
I must take extra care to ensure that all water baths are pre-heated and have reached the desired temperature before placing my Trypsin solution into it. I must also allow sufficient time for the Trypsin to reach the temperature of the water surrounding it in the water bath; this must be checked before I put the photographic film into the solution.
Method
- Start by setting up the necessary equipment and set it up in at appropriate manner.
- Measure out 7ml of the enzyme Trypsin in a measuring cylinder, and pour this into 8 separate test tubes.
- Place each test tube into a water bath, setting each water bath to the temperatures; 20 C, 25 C, 30 C, 35 C, 40 C, 45 C, 50 C, 55 C.
- Allow a few minutes for the Trypsin to come up to temperature. Check temperature with a thermometer before adding 1 strip of photographic film to the solution.
- Start your stopwatch as soon as the photographic film goes into the Trypsin solution; keep timing until the photographic film is completely clear.
- Record the time that the Trypsin takes to digest the Gelatine covered film, compare with the other temperatures. Male note of these results in a table.
Prediction:
Taking into account the knowledge I have attained during my research process I now predict that temperatures in and around body temperature (30oC-40oC) should allow the Trypsin to digest any Gelatine at its quickest. When the temperature rises above 400C the Trypsin enzymes denature slowing down the rate of digestion due to faster collisions of enzymes. If the temperature is lower than 30oC the molecules will move slower therefore there will be less collisions of enzymes with substrates and the rate of digestion will be slower.
I have also taken into account the fact that the temperature in the Pancreas is 40.9oC this where the Trypsin is produced.
Columns in the section of the graph titled “Time taken to digest Gelatine over three tests.” Each box represents first test, second test and third test.
Analysing graphs
After obtaining all of my results from the experiments, I produced a number of different graphs express my results. I felt it would be most appropriate to display my results in a selection of line graphs because they show a general pattern clearly.
The first graph I plotted shows the results my first three experiments, each particular set of results has been plotted in a different colour, each graph followed the pattern I predicted (starting off high then dipping in the middle then rising again). This line graph only seems to have one anomalous result; this was shown in the first experiment. The point does not follow the appropriate pattern and stands out as a mistake in a symmetrical set of results.
My second graph which shows the overall averages of the three experiments generally followed the dipping pattern but there was one slightly anomalous result at the temperature 35oC, it was obviously higher than that of the general pattern, and does not produce the smooth dipping pattern that it should have expressed. On the second line graph I drew a moving point average using the average marks, this was to give a continuous range of data over three experiments. It also helps to predict what the time taken for experiments following the few I produced would be without actually conducting the experiment.
Conclusion
The graphs that I have produced represent the data I collected in the table above. After analysing the graphs I have concluded that photographic film which was placed in and around body temperature was digested the fastest. This is because of the fact that the enzyme Trypsin is produced in temperatures of around 40oC, at these temperatures the Trypsin molecules can collide quicker to allow a faster digestion process. My results seem accurate and support this argument although experiment 1 on my Line graph isn’t completely symmetrical.
My prediction that the rate of digestion would be quickest in and around body temperature was therefore correct. Secondary sources helped me to predict this allowing me to see that temperatures too high above body temperature denature the action of the enzyme. I also noticed that my graph is similar to y=x2 but not identical this would be something that I could investigate further.
Evaluation:
There is only one anomalous result, which stands out in my mind, which is that of the 35oC point on the average line graph. This seems to be slightly inaccurate, as it is slightly higher than expected. Taking into account that my method and plan were to make the experiment as fair a test as possible, I had to make sure that the results were exactly accurate. Obviously this could not be possible because I could not ensure exact measurements were used. This is a particular reason for the inaccuracy in the results. I do believe I followed the guidelines set by my self in both the fair test and safe test, although I now realise that the order in which each experiment was performed could be improved. I would spend more time on making sure each experiment was performed more accurately, and do each temperature separately and observe what I happening more closely.
I do know one inaccuracy that cannot be ruled out of the experiments, unless there is another way of performing it, which is human error. It is perfectly easy in many cases if the acetate is clear or not. This will be a future problem unless another way I discovered to stop the clock. A possible solution to this would be to use a light on one side of the test tube and a light sensor on the other side of the tube, which is connected to the top watch. This would eliminate the problem of human error stopping the watch at the incorrect time.
Although there will be slight mistakes in my results, the basic shapes of my graphs are obviously clearly represented. On the whole all my graphs back up my prediction and express clearly represented data. I could make results even clearer by using my temperature values. I may, in future, try mixing an even selection of consecutive temperature values to gain a midway temperature value. This would give me much more accurate results and any anomalous results would become much clearer allowing me to repeat them and in the long run gain a more accurate result.
Overall I feel pleased with the experiment I produced and I am happy with the varried selection of data I collected. I have clearly analysed my results I know for the future the improvements that must be made.
Bibliography
- The website was used as a secondary source for me.
- The encycloypedia Britannica.
- AQA Science guide.
- Columbia Encycloypaedia.
- The website www.enzymes.com.