• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Testing an LDR

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Physics Coursework – Testing an LDR based sensor

I have devised a project to test the effect of a change in distance between the light source and LDR in a potential divider circuit. Ideally, it would be possible to determine the distance of any light source given it’s light output in Lux, however, practically, I only expect to be able to predict the distance of a particular bulb.

Background

Before performing my experiment, I needed to carry out some background work to decide how I should carry it out. The following documents my background research, and the conclusions it led me to. All background research was done independently, and I came to my decision without outside help.

Types of Sensor

The first, and most obvious, choice for my experiment is the LDR, or Light Dependent Resistor. Light dependent resistors work by having a small area of semi-conducting material whose resistance decreases as the light intensity increases. There is an inverse relationship between the two. The majority of LDRs use a cadmium sulphide cell as the semi-conducting material. Cadmium sulphide cells are cheap, have quite a large range of resistance, and are sensitive to a variety of wavelengths of light, from ultraviolet through to infrared. When cadmium sulphide (CdS) is subjected to light, the absorption of photons excites electrons to a higher energy state. When in this higher energy state, the electrons are able to flow as a current.

...read more.

Middle

image02.png

The first test I conducted was with the lamp at the maximum distance of one metre from the LDR. Following are the results. Unless otherwise stated, all results are two 2 d.p.

R1 / Ohms

0V

4V

6V

8V

10V

12V

100

10.11

10.08

9.89

9.59

9.15

8.77

220

10.11

10.05

9.67

9.11

8.36

7.68

470

10.11

9.95

9.26

8.26

7.07

5.99

1000

10.10

9.82

8.50

6.90

5.34

4.17

2200

10.10

9.50

7.16

5.02

3.42

2.46

4700

10.10

8.93

5.41

3.20

1.96

1.33

The results highlighted in bold are anomalous. As the voltage from the power supply was set to 10.0V, I can only assume they are either due to random error (such as power fluctuations) or systematic error (i.e. a incorrectly calibrated multimeter or power supply). As the voltage across the lamp was increased, the range of values also increased. This suggests the best data would be collected with the maximum rated voltage of 12V. After testing at the maximum distance, I took the other extreme, and performed the same tests, but this time with the bulb touching the LDR. I did not

...read more.

Conclusion

Voltage

6V

8V

10V

12V

Average Range

4.78

5.26

5.295

5.225

As can be seen, the 10V reading has the highest average range, albeit by a very small margin. Thus I chose 10V as the voltage to use on the lamp circuit. I chose to use 1000 Ohms as the value for the static resistor in the potential divider, because it seemed to offer a good balance of a wide range of values without approaching the limits of the range too quickly.

Overall, I thought the preliminary testing went well, and so decided to keep the same method, equipment, and setup for my final experiment.

Implementation

Due to the success of my preliminary test, I decided to use the same method in my final experiment. I chose a value of 10V to power the halogen lamp, 10V across the sensor circuit, 1000 Ω for the fixed resistor, and 1 metre in 10 cm intervals for the input variable.

Procedure

Following is a brief procedure for each reading taken:

  1. Check voltages on both power packs
  2. Measure distance between glass front of bulb and protruding ‘bubble’ of LDR
  3. Take reading
  4. Wait 5 seconds
  5. Repeat

Risk Assessment

Risk: Electric Shock

Severity: Mild, 1/5

Likelihood: Unlikely, 1/5

Risk Factor: 1/25 – safe

Precautions: take care when dealing with electrical wires.

Risk: Burns from hot lamp

Severity: Mild, 1/5

Likelihood: Quite Possible, 3/5

Risk Factor: 3/25 – safe

Precautions: Avoid touching lamp bulb when adjusting distances. Instead move using the retort clamp.


[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photovoltaic, 27/01/06

[2]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryogenic_detectors, 27/01/06

[3]http://www.emant.com/316002.page, 08/03/06

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Fields & Forces section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Fields & Forces essays

  1. Investigating a factor affecting the voltage output of a transformer.

    I shall repeat this procedure three times and average the results for each nominal voltage. Then I shall tabulate my results and plot primary voltage against secondary voltage on a graph so that I can then analyse my results. Safety There are a number of safety aspects I must bear

  2. Investigation to determine the viscosity of glycerol.

    Turbulent Flow "Flow in which the velocity at any point varies erratically"7 In a liquid which has turbulent flow a particle of the liquid has variable velocity and do not flow in uniform layers. This results in varying velocity at different points within the liquid due to variations in viscous forces acting on the body.

  1. Physics Spring Coursework

    use the previously found values of k, q and r along with the known mass. I will sub these values into the equations ln(pkq)= 0.21�0.02 and ln(pmr)= 1.54�0.06, then rearrange to find the min and max value of p. ln(pkq)= 0.21�0.02 pkq=e(0.21�0.02)

  2. I determined the band gap of an undoped sample of germanium. I Measuring the ...

    right by the FB and the right edge of the strip (instead of the left edge with negatively charged carriers) would have a higher potential. "The conductivity, ?o, carrier mobility, �H, and the carrier concentration, n are all connected by a factor called the Hall coefficient, RH"(3).

  1. Physics Coursework, Visit to Holly House

    to magnetic fields of the strength used in medical imaging today, however most facilities prefer not to scan pregnant women as there has not been much research done in the area of biological defects on a developing foetus, as obviously it is very difficult to conduct such research, as many pregnant women do not want to take this risk.

  2. Database Coursework

    A digital camera could be used to take pictures and then download them into the project. However, seeing as I am doing the project on Microsoft Access (see above), it is pointless to try and include photos. I will also use a CDRW to back up data.

  1. Design of Customer Input Form

    It can be set to numbers or characters, so that only these types of characters can be typed into the fields. This would be useful in the telephone number field. A phone number always contains numbers; there wouldn't be any letters.

  2. A Comparison of Methods for History Matching.

    which minimises the danger of applying a simple multiplication factor, of generating permeabilities that are inconsistent with reservoir porosity. Another advantage of the AHM method with 3DSL is the accountability for the changes in heterogeneity. This is done by the use of 'Dykstra - Parsons' coefficient, which is a very effective tool when changing permeability values.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work