• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The experiment involves the determination, of the effective mass of a spring (ms) and the spring constant (k).

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Investigation of the Properties of a Spring 14/11/99.

Introduction

The experiment involves the determination, of the effective mass of a spring (ms) and the spring constant (k).

It is known that the period (T), of small oscillations of a mass (m) at the end of a helical spring is given by the formula:

T= 2π(m+ms)

          k

In this experiment the same clamp was used for all readings to make sure there were no miss-readings taken due to differences in the way the clamp and stand reacted to the movement of the mass.  Also the spring in all readings was the same as, after all the ms and k of two different springs is going to be different and lead to different readings.

The things that were varied in the experiment were, the number of slotted masses on the end of the spring and the number of oscillations of the mass to be counted.   The number of oscillations (T) will be measured using a stopcock.  Which was varied to give a number between 20 and 30.   To keep the number of oscillations, for every mass as similar to each other as possible.  To help keep the experiment fair.      

So to find ms and k the following experiment was devised and carried out:

...read more.

Middle

25.3

600

25

26.9

27.0

26.95

These were the trial readings taken before the experiment, they were taken to help in the decision of the size of the limits.  The readings are shown in the order that they were taken.  They were taken in this order, to check that the masses, which were to be used were usable.   i.e. the smaller masses did not oscillate to quickly to be measured and that the larger masses did not damage the spring.  Hence the order of the readings.

Main Readings

Mass/Kg

x number of oscillation’s

Time for x oscillations

( in seconds)

xT av/s

T/s

T2/s2

ΔxT/s

% unc in xT

% unc in T2

ΔT2/s2

0.100

0.200

0.250

0.300

0.400

0.450

0.500

0.600

50

40

35

30

25

30

25

25

xT

xT

xT

23.34

25.98

25.05

23.33

22.04

28.30

24.65

26.88

0.47

0.65

0.72

0.78

0.88

0.94

0.99

1.08

0.221

0.423

0.518

0.608

0.774

0.889

0.972

1.158

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

21

15

13

13

11

11

10

9

42

30

26

26

22

22

20

18

0.093

0.127

0.135

0.158

0.170

0.196

0.194

0.208

23.62

25.86

25.01

23.35

22.01

28.25

24.67

26.89

22.61

26.33

25.09

23.37

22.01

28.32

24.61

26.88

23.80

25.75

25.06

23.26

22.09

28.34

24.66

26.86

Procedure/Method

When planning the experiment, there were two methods of obtaining information about the spring, which were discussed one being the one decided upon.  The other being a way of finding out the spring constant (k), by just measuring the extension (x) of the spring, with different sized weights attached to the spring. Which would have given a straight-line graph going through the origin, where the gradient of the line would give the value k.


As shown in the graph below:

image01.png

Graph of Force/N against  Extension/m for a spring

This experiment was chosen over the other one, as not only can k be found but ms

...read more.

Conclusion

2 = 2 × % unc in xT2

To find the value of ΔT2/S2 the following formula was used, ΔT2/S2 = T2/S2 × % unc in xT2

                                                            100

image03.png

Conclusion

The graphs show that the formula, T2= 4π2m+4π2ms   does indeed give a straight-line graph of form Y = mx + c.

k         k

The graphs show that the value of ms = 0.025 +/− 0.1 kg  and the value of k = 20 +/− 6 N/m      

The objective of this experiment was to determine ms and k of a spring which has been done within the limits, 0.125 and − 0.075 kg for ms and  26 and 14 N/m for k.

Critical Analysis of Results

The experiment could have been improved in the following ways:

  1. More readings for each mass could have been taken to get a more accurate mean value.  
  2. A greater range of masses could have been used to get a more accurate trend line for the graph.
  3. There could have been more time for the experiment, so that the readings etc would not be so rushed
  4. The bounces of the spring could have somehow been restricted to the vertical.
  5. The measurement of time could be improved, by using a light beam connected to a timer to measure the time.  The apparatus could be set up so that at the bottom of one oscillation the weight would break the beam and start the timer then at the start of the next the weight would break the beam and stop the clock.  This would give a more accurate measurement of time.  

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Fields & Forces section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Fields & Forces essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Experiment to determine gravity from a spring using digital techniques

    3 star(s)

    In order to calculate the period of the motion, the time for the 1st peak was taken from the time for the 11th peak and this was divided by 10. * The mass on the spring was weighed, including the slotted masses, the mass holder and the CD.

  2. Experiment to determine gravity from a spring using analogue techniques

    * This was then repeated for differing masses, in this case the masses were 0.01kg up to 0.1kg in 0.01kg increments. This part of the experiment was then repeated for the two different springs. * It was found that the second spring could not take mass over 0.05kg, as it

  1. Measuring The Constant g; The Acceleration Due To Gravity

    This experiment was certainly a success, as these results are viable to be used in everyday calculations to an adequate degree of accuracy. Evaluation Of Experiment Like mentioned above, overall I believe that this experiment was most certainly a success, which can be affirmed by my statistical analysis to prove so.

  2. Investigation to determine the viscosity of glycerol.

    The body reaches terminal velocity because when it is dropped into glycerol, there is friction created between the glycerol and the ball. This force of friction is called viscosity. There is also an upward upthrust force applied on the sphere.

  1. Experiment to calculate spring constant of 2 springs

    * The 1.2m dynamics track was then placed on a horizontal surface. In order the ensure that this dynamics track was horizontal, a spirit level was uses, and the adjustable feet of the dynamics track were adjusted until the spirit level showed that the track was exactly level.

  2. Determination of Force Constant k from Spring-mass System

    Hang the hanger which has a mass of 20g to the spring. 3. Use the G-clamp to fix the stand on the table. So when the experiment starts, the support is well fixed. 4. Put a slotted mass on the hanger and weight the total mass.

  1. charging a capacitor at a constant rate(C08)

    6.7 14.2 21.9 30.1 38.6 46.8 The graph of V against t is a straight line passing through origin showing that the p.d.

  2. In this experiment, we investigated the relationship between the difference in work and mechanical ...

    Mechanical advantage increases as the height of textbooks decrease. Introduction (Ritoko Baba) In our daily life, people carry their belongings with them to go to any places. At least most of people have felt that the belongings get heavier when they go up a hill.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work