• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Principles and Limitations of Electron Microscopy.

Extracts from this document...


Natasha Prior K10

The Principles and Limitations of Electron Microscopy.

An Electron Microscope is a type of microscope that makes use of a beam of electrons rather than visible light.  Which is due to the fact that the wavelength of electrons is much smaller than the wavelength of visible light, an Electron Microscope not only gives a high magnification but it also has high resolution. This means that details can be seen clearly. An Electron Microscope is very similar to a Light Microscope in the ways in which it works but, instead of using glass lenses to focus a beam of light, it uses magnets to focus a beam of electrons. Electrons are very small, so they are scattered if they hit molecules in the air due to this they must travel through a vacuum. Specimens that are to be examined must be cut into very thin sections, and these must be treated so that they can be examined in these conditions. The variety of chemical processes that are carried out in this preparation may change the appearance considerably.

...read more.


    Electron Microscopes were developed due to the limitations of Light Microscopes.  A good light microscope can only magnify an object effectively about 1500 times.  The Electron Microscope can give clear pictures that are magnified 500,000 times.  It is important to appreciate how important this can be in practice: with the Electron microscope an object the size  of a pinhead can be enlarged to the point at which it has a diameter of well over a kilometre; a cell with a diameter of 10 micrometres finishes up with a diameter of 5 metres.  

    Light Microscopes are limited by the physics of light to 500x or 1000x magnification and a resolution of 0.2 micrometers.  In the early 1930’s this theoretical limit had been reached and there was a scientific desire to see the fine details of the interior structures of organelles e.g, Mitochondria, nucleus…etc.  This required 10,000x plus magnification, which was just not possible, using light microscopes.

    The transmission electron microscope (TEM) was the first type of Electron Microscope to be developed and is patterned exactly

...read more.


    Two principal considerations in Electron Microscopy are that air must not be present inside the microscope, i.e.  the specimen must be mounted in a vacuum.  Electrons would be scattered or absorbed by air and so no image could be formed. The second principle is that obviously beams of electrons would equally be absorbed by lenses.  They are usually focused by magnetic lenses, which deflect the beam in magnetic fields.  Just as in a light microscope we have a condenser and an objective but we cannot view the image with the eye and so there is a third “lens” called a “projecting eyepiece”, which produces a real image which can be focused on to a fluorescent screen.  (Bonney et al 1982).

    The Electron Microscope has been very useful since it was invented as it allows us to venture into a specimen in much more detail.  Even though Light Microscopes are good for using in school, an Electron Microscope is much more effective due to it having a much higher resolution and magnification.  


Brian H.Bonney, 1982. Cell biology level II.  BECTEC books.

Michael Roberts, Michael Reiss and Grace Monger, 1993. Biology, Principles and Processes, Thomas nelson and Sons limited.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

The candidate goes straight into the essay without any kind of introduction, this is not a sensible idea. You should always take the time to properly introduce your essay, as this is your chance to grab the readers attention and ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The candidate goes straight into the essay without any kind of introduction, this is not a sensible idea. You should always take the time to properly introduce your essay, as this is your chance to grab the readers attention and get them interested in what you have to say. You can engage the reader by mentioning a fact or quote that you find interesting, though this will only work if it is relevant to the topic you’re discussing. An introduction should clearly state what you plan to discuss so that the premise of your essay is clear and you should briefly introduce your topic, in this case, you should describe what an electron microscope is and what is used for.

Level of analysis

The candidate has written about the differences between optical and electron microscopes which would be fine if the aim of the essay was to compare the two, however the essay title implies that the purpose of this essay is to discuss the electron microscope, well it is acceptable to mention the optical microscope the candidate wastes time discussing comparisons when it simply isn’t necessary, as it actually detracts from their work rather than adds to it. However I do recommend that you take the time to research your topic, as including additional information shows your interest and dedication and can make your essay more enjoyable to read, just make sure that the information you include is relevant. In this case, it would acceptable to include information on the history of the microscope and how the electron microscope was first developed or perhaps you could give examples in which the electron microscope has aided scientific discoveries. Furthermore this essay ends without any sort of conclusion, this is a common mistake but one that you should avoid. It is necessary to conclude your work as this gives you an opportunity to leave the reader with a good impression. You should summarise your key points and ideas and state why these are important and you should also try to write a personal reflection as your teacher/examiner is interested in what you have to say and this can help draw your essay to an appropriate close.

Quality of writing

At times the layout of this essay is confusing, there is section in which the candidate has suddenly decided to use headings and give information in a bullet point style which is something I would not recommend for this type of work. You should be writing in continual prose as this is the accepted way write a scientific essay. However the candidate does uses appropriate technical terms and there no issues with spelling or grammar.

Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by pictureperfect 26/07/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Microscopes & Lenses essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    The advantages and limitations of electron microscopy.

    4 star(s)

    Free electrons behave similarly to electromagnetic radiation, they have a very short wavelength and the greater their energy the shorter the wavelength. Electrons are suitable for use in microscopy for two main reasons, their wavelength is equally as short as that of X rays and they can be easily focused through the use of electromagnets.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Microscopy. History of the microscope:-

    3 star(s)

    Electron microscope <-- Light Microscope --> Light microscopes are limited in their ability to resolve fine details by the properties of light and the refractive materials used to manufacture lenses. A lens magnifies by bending light. Light microscopes are restricted in their ability to resolve features because of diffraction.

  1. Peer reviewed

    Describe the principles and limitations of transmission and scanning electron microscopes. Specific reference should ...

    3 star(s)

    than the transmission electron microscope they can investigate a greater depth of field which is not possible in light microscopes.However they are much more expensive to set up. The most serious limitation of electron microscopy is the necessity of vacuum and metallic surfaces ,meaning only dead specimens can be inspected.Consequently

  2. Electron Microscopy

    Also, the scanning electron microscope does not have such a high resolving powers as the transmission electron microscope does. The specimen to be micrographed by a transmission microscope must be very thin and therefore the creation of the specimen must be very accurate.

  1. My experiments focus is to obtain an accurate measurement for a specific lenss power.

    Finally I would repeat step 6 until I have data for a range of approximately 10 U values. 8. 1/U and 1/V values must be calculated. These represent the curvature of waves before and after. Referring to the curvature equation, the V and U values are essentially the radii of curvature (values stated in metres).

  2. Explain how the electron microscope has affected our knowledge of cell form and structure

    If you were to increase the magnification of an image on an electron microscope, the image would become clearer, but if you did the same with a light microscope, the image would blur.

  1. The History, Development and Use of the Light and Electron Microscope.

    Fixation: - The material has to be preserved in a life-like condition with distortion at its minimum. 2. Dehydration: - Any traces of water are removed from the material that is now fixed. 3. Clearing: - Dehydrating alcohol is removed from the material to make it transparent.

  2. Investigating the Positioning of Real Images formed by a Convex Lens.

    I will change u and f separately. 10. Ensuring a fair test A fair test involves changing independent variables one at a time, or separately. We can then be sure that changes in the dependant variable are caused only by changes in the independent variable that we are changing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work